發(fā)布時間：2018-03-25 15:51

  本文選題：特洛伊羅斯與克瑞西　切入點：戲謔性　出處：《四川外國語大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：《特洛伊羅斯與克瑞西達》是威廉·莎士比亞的中期作品。這部作品自出版以來一直受到廣泛的爭議�，F(xiàn)代批評家普遍把它視為一部悲劇,并且認為該作品是繼莎翁四大悲劇之后的第五部悲劇。它根據(jù)荷馬史詩和中世紀傳奇改編而成,盡管在二戰(zhàn)后受到了重視,國內外批評家們也從多種角度對其進行了分析和研究,但是焦點主要集中在對這部作品體裁和主題等方面的探討,而對于文本中的一些重要的特質關注較少,例如文本中普遍存在的戲謔成分。這些戲謔的成分構成了文本的“戲謔性”。學界普遍認為戲謔是喜劇作品不可缺少的要素,而對于悲劇作品而言,“戲謔性”是指作者以喜劇的方式處理悲劇人物和悲劇本身。筆者在對文本中的戲謔成分進行討論的基礎上,進一步深入對莎士比亞幽默藝術的認識,并且以此為例對悲劇作品中戲謔的獨特功能展開比較系統(tǒng)的探討。通過文本細讀,筆者發(fā)現(xiàn)作者莎士比亞獨具匠心地使用了文字游戲,反諷和戲仿等手法。這些隱藏在悲劇文本中的戲謔的表現(xiàn)方式不僅是在塑造角色,構建情節(jié)等方面發(fā)揮重要的作用,更以一種獨特的方式反映了作者本人強烈的反戰(zhàn)意識和階級觀念。論文由三個部分組成:第一部分為介紹部分,首先對莎士比亞和《特洛伊羅斯與克瑞西達》這部作品進行簡要的介紹,其次是對這部戲劇批評的回顧。第二部分為論文的主體部分,主要從三個方面對這部作品進行討論。第一章討論作為戲謔的修辭手段,包括對伊利亞特和喬叟同名詩的戲仿,以喜劇為目的的雙關語和悲劇性的反諷。第二章討論作為戲謔的狂歡。本章以巴赫金的對話和狂歡理論作為基礎,進一步發(fā)掘文本中的戲謔成分。第三章節(jié)著重討論戲謔的獨特功能。第三部分是結論部分,指出:戲謔不僅普遍存在于這部戰(zhàn)爭和愛情交織的悲劇中,而且為這出悲劇以及劇中角色的悲劇命運施以重彩。同時,莎士比亞以這樣一種獨特而隱晦的方式表達了自己的反戰(zhàn)觀點和階級意識。
[Abstract]:Troilus and Cressida is the intermediate work of William Shakespeare. It has been widely debated since its publication. It is widely regarded by modern critics as a tragedy. It is considered to be the fifth tragedy after Shakespeare's four tragedies. It is based on Homer epic and medieval legends, despite the importance attached to it after World War II. Critics at home and abroad have also analyzed and studied it from a variety of angles, but the focus is mainly on the genre and theme of the novel, but little attention has been paid to some important features of the text. For example, there are a lot of playful elements in the text. These playful elements constitute the "playfulness" of the text. For tragic works, "playfulness" means that the author deals with the tragic characters and the tragedy itself in a comedy way. On the basis of the discussion of the playful elements in the text, the author makes a further understanding of Shakespeare's humorous art. And take this as an example to the tragedy works in the playful unique function carries on the more systematic discussion. Through the text careful reading, the author discovers that the author Shakespeare has used the word game ingeniously, Irony and parody. These playful expressions, hidden in tragic texts, not only play an important role in shaping characters, constructing plots, etc. It also reflects the author's strong anti-war consciousness and class concept in a unique way. The thesis consists of three parts: the first part is the introduction. The first part is a brief introduction to Shakespeare and Troilus and Krissida, and the second is a review of the criticism of the play. The second part is the main part of the thesis. The first chapter deals with the parody of Iliad and Chaucer's poems of the same name as a rhetorical device for banter. This chapter is based on Bakhtin's theory of dialogue and carnival. Chapter three focuses on the unique function of banter. The third part is the conclusion, which points out that banter not only exists in this war and love intertwined tragedy, At the same time, Shakespeare expressed his anti-war views and class consciousness in such a unique and obscure way.
【學位授予單位】：四川外國語大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：I561.073

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 南茜;“三獨”小議[J];外國文學研究;1985年04期

2 ;[J];;年期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 王海瑞;論莎士比亞《特洛伊羅斯與克瑞西達》的戲謔性[D];四川外國語大學;2015年

，

本文編號：1663807