二十世紀中國文學本質(zhì)論的發(fā)展歷史及未來走向
發(fā)布時間:2018-08-12 16:16
【摘要】: 二十一世紀,文學本質(zhì)論繼續(xù)向前發(fā)展,表現(xiàn)為人們開始對審美意識形態(tài)論提出質(zhì)疑。論文試圖通過對二十世紀中國文學本質(zhì)論發(fā)展歷吏的簡要分析,希望理清頭緒的同時,真正清楚前人對文學的認識達到何種程度,后人應(yīng)該在這些程度上做些什么。通過認真分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)前人對文學的規(guī)定均具有六個特點:一,將文學列入藝術(shù)之列;二,認識到語言在文學中的重要性;三,多從功能出發(fā)規(guī)定文學的本質(zhì);四,從作家創(chuàng)作出發(fā)規(guī)定文學的本質(zhì);五,從辯證唯物論出發(fā)認識到文學與生活的正確關(guān)系;六,本體論認識從二十世紀四十年代以前的萌芽狀態(tài),開始在八十年代以后的理論界內(nèi)成為一種呼聲。作為后人,我經(jīng)過深入思考,先談?wù)摿俗约簩徝酪庾R形態(tài)論的兩點質(zhì)疑(一,審美意識形態(tài)論無法闡明文學的獨特性;二,審美不能作為文學的本質(zhì)特性),然后,得出自己對中國文學本質(zhì)論未來走向的基本看法:首先,通過分析從其它角度規(guī)定文學本質(zhì)的不足,得出從本體論出發(fā)的必要性,并對其優(yōu)勢加以闡釋,主要從文學與語言的關(guān)系和語言帶給文學的獨特性展開;其次,得出文學是語言藝術(shù)的本質(zhì)規(guī)定。最終的結(jié)論,并不代表最終的真理,它只是我們邁向真理的一小步而已,相信,在許多人的眼中,它連一小步的價值也稱不上,但它能引起思考。
[Abstract]:In the 21 ~ (th) century, the theory of literary essence continued to develop, as people began to question the theory of aesthetic ideology. Through a brief analysis of the history of the development of Chinese literary essence in the 20th century, the paper tries to clarify the understanding of literature and what future generations should do at the same time. Through careful analysis, it is found that the previous regulations on literature have six characteristics: first, to include literature in art; second, to recognize the importance of language in literature; third, to define the essence of literature from the perspective of function; and 4. The essence of literature is defined from the writer's creation; fifth, the correct relationship between literature and life is recognized from the dialectical materialism; and sixth, the ontological understanding starts from the budding state before the 1940s. Began to become a voice in the theoretical circle after the 1980's. As a descendant, after deep thinking, I first talked about my two doubts about the theory of aesthetic ideology (first, aesthetic ideology can not clarify the uniqueness of literature; second, aesthetics cannot be regarded as the essential characteristic of literature), and then, First of all, through the analysis of the deficiency of the essence of literature from other angles, the necessity of starting from ontology is obtained, and its advantages are explained. It mainly starts from the relationship between literature and language and the uniqueness that language brings to literature; secondly, it concludes that literature is the essential stipulation of language art. The final conclusion does not represent the ultimate truth. It is only a small step towards truth. It is believed that in the eyes of many people, it is not even a small step of value, but it can cause thinking.
【學位授予單位】:西北大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2009
【分類號】:I02
本文編號:2179590
[Abstract]:In the 21 ~ (th) century, the theory of literary essence continued to develop, as people began to question the theory of aesthetic ideology. Through a brief analysis of the history of the development of Chinese literary essence in the 20th century, the paper tries to clarify the understanding of literature and what future generations should do at the same time. Through careful analysis, it is found that the previous regulations on literature have six characteristics: first, to include literature in art; second, to recognize the importance of language in literature; third, to define the essence of literature from the perspective of function; and 4. The essence of literature is defined from the writer's creation; fifth, the correct relationship between literature and life is recognized from the dialectical materialism; and sixth, the ontological understanding starts from the budding state before the 1940s. Began to become a voice in the theoretical circle after the 1980's. As a descendant, after deep thinking, I first talked about my two doubts about the theory of aesthetic ideology (first, aesthetic ideology can not clarify the uniqueness of literature; second, aesthetics cannot be regarded as the essential characteristic of literature), and then, First of all, through the analysis of the deficiency of the essence of literature from other angles, the necessity of starting from ontology is obtained, and its advantages are explained. It mainly starts from the relationship between literature and language and the uniqueness that language brings to literature; secondly, it concludes that literature is the essential stipulation of language art. The final conclusion does not represent the ultimate truth. It is only a small step towards truth. It is believed that in the eyes of many people, it is not even a small step of value, but it can cause thinking.
【學位授予單位】:西北大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2009
【分類號】:I02
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條
1 錢中文;;論文學審美意識形態(tài)的邏輯起點及其歷史生成[J];文學評論;2007年01期
2 吳炫;;中國當代文藝理論研究的三個缺失[J];文學評論;2007年01期
3 童慶炳;;新時期文學審美特征論及其意義[J];文學評論;2006年01期
4 錢中文;;對文學不是意識形態(tài)的“考論”的考論[J];文藝研究;2007年02期
5 董學文;;文學本質(zhì)界定與唯物史觀[J];文藝研究;2007年06期
,本文編號:2179590
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2179590.html
教材專著