本文選題：說(shuō)明性口語(yǔ)語(yǔ)篇 + 語(yǔ)步　； 參考：《解放軍外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)》2017年03期

【摘要】：本文借鑒Swales(1981)等的語(yǔ)步分析法對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)某重點(diǎn)高校英語(yǔ)專業(yè)三年級(jí)學(xué)生英語(yǔ)對(duì)比類說(shuō)明性口語(yǔ)語(yǔ)篇進(jìn)行語(yǔ)步分析,發(fā)現(xiàn):1)對(duì)比類語(yǔ)篇一般包含"引言""相似性""差異性"和"回應(yīng)"語(yǔ)步;2)語(yǔ)步、步驟和小句與語(yǔ)篇質(zhì)量間分別呈高度、中等和弱正相關(guān);3)高、中、低組在語(yǔ)步上差異顯著,高、低組在步驟上差異顯著;4)高、中組在語(yǔ)篇結(jié)構(gòu)上比較完整,低分組語(yǔ)篇結(jié)構(gòu)非常不完整;5)高、中、低組差異性語(yǔ)步功能實(shí)現(xiàn)較好,相似性語(yǔ)步功能實(shí)現(xiàn)較差。高、中組引言語(yǔ)步功能實(shí)現(xiàn)較好,回應(yīng)語(yǔ)步功能實(shí)現(xiàn)不理想,低分組引言和回應(yīng)語(yǔ)步功能實(shí)現(xiàn)都較差。
[Abstract]:This paper uses the stylistic analysis method of Swales/ 1981 et al to analyze the descriptive discourse of English contrast class among the third year English majors in some key colleges and universities in China. It is found that contrastive discourses generally contain "introduction" similarity "difference" and "response" step 2), the steps and clauses are highly correlated with the quality of the text, the middle and weak positive correlation is 3) high, and the difference between middle and low groups is significant and high. The low group has significant difference in step (4), the middle group is relatively complete in the text structure, the low group text structure is very incomplete (5) high, the middle and low groups have better realization of different speech step function, and the similar step function is poor. High, middle group speech step function is better, response language step function is not ideal, low group introduction and response step function are poor.
【作者單位】： 同濟(jì)大學(xué)外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：H315

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 繆庭;;“說(shuō)明性+敘述性”完形填空例析[J];新高考(語(yǔ)文數(shù)學(xué)英語(yǔ));2007年12期

2 張淑艷;;八招解決詞義猜測(cè)題[J];考試(高考英語(yǔ)版);2010年01期

3 王強(qiáng);;第32課時(shí) 閱讀理解(一)上補(bǔ)下聯(lián),猜詞匯[J];文教資料;2002年10期

，

本文編號(hào)：1969492