【摘要】：語義角色從誕生之初就遭遇界定不明、數(shù)量不清等爭議問題,但這并未影響其在語言學(xué)及自然語言信息處理中的廣泛應(yīng)用。不同學(xué)者劃分語義角色的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不同,得出的類型和數(shù)量也因而有異,但我們卻總能在各種體系間找到"能指"有別,但"所指"相同的語義角色范疇。比較分析Апресян,Падучева等俄羅斯學(xué)者與國內(nèi)學(xué)者的主要語義角色,從中闡釋各學(xué)者在角色范疇劃分方面的異同,意在探索語義角色范疇劃分的正確途徑和方法,為其在語言學(xué)理論和自然語言信息處理中的應(yīng)用提供借鑒。
[Abstract]:At the beginning of its birth, semantic roles have encountered many controversial issues, such as unclear definition and quantity, but this has not affected their extensive application in linguistic and natural language information processing. Different scholars have different criteria for dividing semantic roles, which leads to different types and numbers. However, we can always find different semantic roles among different systems, but "signify" the same category of semantic roles. This paper makes a comparative analysis of the main semantic roles of Russian scholars, such as Russian scholars and domestic scholars, and explains the similarities and differences in the classification of roles, in order to explore the correct ways and methods for the classification of semantic roles. It provides reference for its application in linguistic theory and natural language information processing.
【作者單位】： 黑龍江大學(xué);
【基金】：國家社科基金重大項(xiàng)目俄羅斯“語言學(xué)大百科詞典”翻譯工程(11&ZD131) 教育部人文社科項(xiàng)目“阿普列相語言學(xué)思想在俄語教學(xué)中的應(yīng)用”(16YJC740068)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：H35
，

本文編號(hào)：2430796