【摘要】：婚姻自由既是婚姻法上一項(xiàng)非常重要的原則,也是人們?cè)诨橐鲱I(lǐng)域的一項(xiàng)基本權(quán)利。就其本質(zhì)來(lái)說(shuō),包括私屬性和公屬性兩個(gè)方面�；橐鲎杂傻乃綄傩允瞧洳豢蓜儕Z的本質(zhì)屬性,是保障公民自由和發(fā)展個(gè)人人格的極其重要的私法工具。據(jù)此,婚姻關(guān)系當(dāng)事人能夠基于自己的自由意志對(duì)其婚姻生活進(jìn)行支配,從而實(shí)現(xiàn)私法自治,這是婚姻自由的根本價(jià)值所在。與此同時(shí),婚姻自由牽涉到當(dāng)事雙方、家庭和社會(huì)的利益,具有一定的公屬性,政府可以通過(guò)支配和利用這種公屬性的方式促進(jìn)社會(huì)公共利益的實(shí)現(xiàn)。基于婚姻自由的私屬性和公屬性,可以將其分為憲法上的婚姻自由與民法上的婚姻自由,憲法上的婚姻自由主要通過(guò)個(gè)人保障機(jī)制與制度保障機(jī)制實(shí)現(xiàn),民法上的婚姻自由則包含非婚同居、結(jié)婚自由、離婚自由與婚內(nèi)自由四項(xiàng)內(nèi)容。 現(xiàn)代社會(huì)里,公私法的日漸融合已經(jīng)成為不可阻擋的趨勢(shì),大量的公法規(guī)范逐漸滲透到私法領(lǐng)域。在此背景之下,婚姻自由及其相關(guān)制度的構(gòu)建必須通過(guò)公私法之間的協(xié)調(diào)來(lái)構(gòu)筑。對(duì)人們的個(gè)人自由與社會(huì)公共利益進(jìn)行通盤考慮,實(shí)現(xiàn)個(gè)人利益和社會(huì)公共利益之間的平衡,將成為立法者在構(gòu)建婚姻自由及其相關(guān)制度過(guò)程中一項(xiàng)極其艱巨的任務(wù)。過(guò)分側(cè)重于對(duì)個(gè)人婚姻自由的保護(hù),會(huì)損害社會(huì)公共利益,不利于形成良好的規(guī)則和秩序,過(guò)分保護(hù)公共利益則會(huì)危及個(gè)人婚姻自由的行使。因此,在對(duì)婚姻自由進(jìn)行公法限制時(shí),必須堅(jiān)持合憲原則、公序良俗原則以及區(qū)分原則,通過(guò)公法上的直接限制、私法內(nèi)部的公法性規(guī)范限制以及司法上的限制等方式,尋求個(gè)人婚姻自由與國(guó)家秩序之間的“黃金分割點(diǎn)”,以實(shí)現(xiàn)促進(jìn)個(gè)人婚姻自由與維護(hù)國(guó)家公共利益之間的平衡。
[Abstract]:Freedom of marriage is not only a very important principle in marriage law, but also a basic right in the field of marriage. As far as its essence is concerned, it includes two aspects: private attribute and public attribute. The private attribute of freedom of marriage is its inalienable essential attribute, and it is an extremely important private law tool to protect civil liberties and develop individual personality. Therefore, the parties to a marriage relationship can dominate their marriage life on the basis of their own free will, thus realizing the autonomy of private law, which is the fundamental value of the freedom of marriage. At the same time, the freedom of marriage involves the interests of both parties, the family and the society, and has certain public attributes. The government can promote the realization of social public interest by dominating and utilizing this kind of public property. Based on the private and public attributes of freedom of marriage, it can be divided into constitutional freedom of marriage and civil freedom of marriage. The freedom of marriage in civil law includes four parts: non-marital cohabitation, freedom of marriage, freedom of divorce and freedom of marriage. In modern society, the gradual amalgamation of public and private law has become an irresistible trend, and a large number of public law norms have gradually penetrated into the field of private law. In this context, the freedom of marriage and its related institutions must be constructed through the coordination of public and private law. It will be an extremely arduous task for legislators to consider the individual freedom and the public interest of society and realize the balance between the personal interests and the public interests of the society in the process of constructing the freedom of marriage and its related system. Too much emphasis on the protection of individual freedom of marriage will harm the public interest, which is not conducive to the formation of good rules and order, too much protection of the public interest will endanger the exercise of individual freedom of marriage. Therefore, when restricting the freedom of marriage in public law, we must adhere to the principle of constitutionality, the principle of public order and good custom and the principle of distinction, through the direct restriction of public law, the limitation of public law norms within private law, and the limitation of judicature, etc. In order to achieve the balance between the promotion of individual freedom of marriage and the maintenance of the national public interest, the "golden division" between the freedom of individual marriage and the national order is sought.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D923.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 康娜;;關(guān)系契約視野下的婚姻觀——對(duì)傳統(tǒng)婚姻契約觀的反思和突破[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2009年05期

2 馬億南;婚姻家庭法的弱者保護(hù)功能[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1999年04期

3 歐愛(ài)民;;德國(guó)憲法制度性保障的二元結(jié)構(gòu)及其對(duì)中國(guó)的啟示[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2008年02期

4 楊德橋;;論婚姻內(nèi)容自由——對(duì)婚姻自由原則內(nèi)涵的新拓展[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年19期

5 徐滌宇;;所有權(quán)的類型及其立法結(jié)構(gòu) 《物權(quán)法草案》所有權(quán)立法之批評(píng)[J];中外法學(xué);2006年01期

6 李璞;王林敏;;中國(guó)法律文化視野中的婚姻契約[J];山東理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

7 李昕;趙紅宇;;登記行為的類型化分析[J];上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 魏清沂;論婚姻自由原則[D];蘭州大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2238421