論哈貝馬斯后世俗社會的宗教觀
發(fā)布時間：2018-12-25 17:17
【摘要】：針對西方社會近些年出現(xiàn)的宗教復興現(xiàn)象,哈貝馬斯提出要在世俗理性的基礎(chǔ)上包容宗教,要在后世俗社會和商談倫理學的基礎(chǔ)上,將宗教話語納入政治公共領(lǐng)域,以釋放宗教傳統(tǒng)依然具有活力的解放潛能。但批評者卻認為他的宗教觀及其調(diào)和策略不僅將信仰與知識的界限模糊,從而使西方的自我理解面臨困難,而且還給信教和世俗公民以不平等的認知負擔,彰顯出某種現(xiàn)代世俗理性特權(quán)。爭議的核心在于我們是否應(yīng)該在政治公共領(lǐng)域背后的文化背景中達成一種公共認知條件。這關(guān)系到世俗與神圣、理性與信仰的沖突在新時代的解決。從這些不同立場的批判和爭議聲音中,我們可以看出宗教問題在當代世界中的復雜性。
[Abstract]:In view of the phenomenon of religious revival in western society in recent years, Habermas proposed that religious discourse should be incorporated into the political public domain on the basis of secular rationality and post-secular society and ethics of negotiation. To release the liberating potential of religious traditions that are still alive. But critics argue that his religious views and his reconciliation strategies not only blur the line between belief and knowledge, thus making it difficult for the West to understand itself, but also places an unequal cognitive burden on religious and secular citizens. Show some kind of modern secular rational privilege. The core of the controversy lies in whether we should reach a public cognitive condition in the cultural background behind the political and public sphere. This is related to the secular and sacred, the conflict between reason and faith in the new era. From the critical and controversial voices of these different positions, we can see the complexity of religious issues in the contemporary world.
【作者單位】： 中國社會科學院哲學研究所;
【基金】：中國社會科學院創(chuàng)新工程重大研究項目“當代主要社會思潮的最新動態(tài)研究與批判”(2014YCXZD001)
【分類號】：B516.59
本文編號：2391417
[Abstract]:In view of the phenomenon of religious revival in western society in recent years, Habermas proposed that religious discourse should be incorporated into the political public domain on the basis of secular rationality and post-secular society and ethics of negotiation. To release the liberating potential of religious traditions that are still alive. But critics argue that his religious views and his reconciliation strategies not only blur the line between belief and knowledge, thus making it difficult for the West to understand itself, but also places an unequal cognitive burden on religious and secular citizens. Show some kind of modern secular rational privilege. The core of the controversy lies in whether we should reach a public cognitive condition in the cultural background behind the political and public sphere. This is related to the secular and sacred, the conflict between reason and faith in the new era. From the critical and controversial voices of these different positions, we can see the complexity of religious issues in the contemporary world.
【作者單位】： 中國社會科學院哲學研究所;
【基金】：中國社會科學院創(chuàng)新工程重大研究項目“當代主要社會思潮的最新動態(tài)研究與批判”(2014YCXZD001)
【分類號】：B516.59
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條
1 張持平;吳震;;殷周宗教觀的邏輯進程[J];中國社會科學;1985年06期
2 牟鐘鑒;試論儒家的宗教觀[J];齊魯學刊;1993年04期
3 鐘曉宏;;馬克思宗教觀的歷史唯物主義性質(zhì)思考[J];學理論;2011年09期
4 蔡寶璽;;深生態(tài)意識自然觀:一種新的生存規(guī)范的啟蒙——論托爾斯泰的宗教觀與老子的學說[J];社會科學輯刊;2011年04期
5 周良發(fā);潘紅;;梁漱溟、馮友蘭宗教觀比較研究[J];溫州大學學報(社會科學版);2011年05期
6 張晴;;從三教合流到批佛辟道:論張載對儒家宗教觀的建構(gòu)[J];黑龍江史志;2014年12期
7 姜秉正;洪仁s曌誚坦鄣姆荷衤矍閬騕J];西北大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1992年04期
8 李山峰;;試析孔子的宗教觀——以“天命”與“鬼神”為例[J];學理論;2013年26期
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前2條
1 譚愛武;威廉·詹姆士的實用主義宗教觀[D];湘潭大學;2009年
2 楊勇;啟蒙時代盧梭的宗教觀[D];湖南師范大學;2014年
，本文編號：2391417
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2391417.html
