馬克思主義社會歷史主體理論研究
[Abstract]:Marx holds that the first premise of all human history is the existence of a living individual, and that human social history is the process of human being's birth through labor. This fully affirms the social subject status of human beings. Without human being as the social subject and without human labor, there can be no generation and development of human social history. So he realized that talent is the creator and subject of history, and people create their own history. This shows that they always respect the subject status of the people, play the main role of the people, and satisfy the main interests of the people. The Marxist theory of social and historical subject has always been inherited and developed by the Chinese Communists and plays an extremely important role in arousing the enthusiasm of the masses, giving play to the historical role of the masses and promoting socialist construction. In the new situation, to carry out the Party's mass line conscientiously and realize the Chinese dream of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, we must review the Marxist theory of social and historical subject and strengthen the study and practice of Marxist theory of social and historical subject. Purpose. Marx's theory of social and historical subject is the core and soul of Marxist philosophy. From the theoretical point of view, strengthening the study of Marxist theory of social and historical subject can deepen the understanding and understanding of Marxist philosophy, realize the Sinicization of Marxism, practice the Party's mass line and implement the discipline conscientiously. To study the concept of development, to grasp the essence of the people as the main body to provide theoretical support, and to strengthen the guiding role of Marxist philosophy in the ideological field; from the perspective of practice, to strengthen the study of Marxist social and historical subject theory can make full use of its ruling foundation, party building, and socialist construction and harmony in China. The full text is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is the introduction. It expounds the reasons for this topic, research significance, research status at home and abroad, research methods and innovations. The second chapter explores Mark. The logical inevitability of the formation of the theory of social and historical subject of Marxism is expounded mainly from four aspects: the analysis of the turning of Marxist philosophy subject, the elaboration of the theoretical origin of Marxist philosophy, the exploration of the practical ways of Marxist philosophy to grasp the world and the lofty ideals of Marxism. The formation and development of the theory of social and historical subject.From the embryonic period of the Doctoral Dissertation to the Rhein Paper to the German and French Yearbook,the theory of social and historical subject took shape initially.From the economic and Philosophical Manuscript of 1844 to the basic formation stage of the sacred family,and then to the Communist Manifesto,the theory of social and historical subject was fully demonstrated. The fourth chapter discusses the basic content of Marxist theory of social and historical subject. From the viewpoint of "realistic man" is the starting point of social and historical research, human material production is the basis of social and historical development, and human existence is the yardstick of social and historical development. The masses are the creators of history. The fifth chapter demonstrates the contemporary value of Marx's social historicism theory. The Marxist theory of social historicism is to practice the Party's mass line, implement the scientific outlook on development, build a socialist harmonious society and realize the Chinese dream of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. Both have important theoretical and practical significance.
【學位授予單位】:西華師范大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2016
【分類號】:B038;D61
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 何海濤;鄧小平主體理論及其發(fā)展[J];中南民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版);1998年04期
2 黃作;拉康的說話主體理論述評[J];浙江學刊;2000年02期
3 周峗;;法治的主體[J];文史哲;2009年03期
4 周文蓮;;比較與分析:無意識主體理論——論弗洛伊德與雅克·拉康精神分析路徑間的關鍵問題[J];社會科學論壇;2013年11期
5 倪沫,李江燕;重構觀影主體理論[J];北華大學學報(社會科學版);2004年01期
6 王戰(zhàn)牛;后現(xiàn)代主義主體理論與教學模式[J];安康師專學報;2003年01期
7 馮景源;試析《關于費爾巴哈的提綱》的主體理論[J];南京社會科學;1990年03期
8 曲師;;從“關心自己”到“認識自己”——論福柯主體理論的道德維度[J];北方論叢;2014年02期
9 黃華;;“人之死”何以成為可能——試論?碌脑捳Z/主體理論[J];北京行政學院學報;2009年05期
10 趙建飛;;主體性焦慮——以拉康的主體理論審視“復制人”電影[J];當代電影;2013年10期
相關碩士學位論文 前6條
1 洪注鑫;二十世紀八十年代史家主體理論建構研究[D];江西師范大學;2015年
2 程璞森;馬克思主義社會歷史主體理論研究[D];西華師范大學;2016年
3 周治健;主體理論的嬗變[D];華南理工大學;2013年
4 閆X;從“知識—權力”解析福柯的主體理論[D];山西大學;2013年
5 薛東明;論人權主體理論的歷史及其新發(fā)展[D];山東大學;2013年
6 盛鋒;表演者權主體理論與立法完善[D];華東政法大學;2011年
,本文編號:2226639
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2226639.html