本文選題：意義觀 + 圖像論　； 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：意義理論是分析哲學(xué)的核心內(nèi)容。之所以這樣說,是因為意義問題是分析哲學(xué)家不得不面對而又必須嘗試解決的首要問題。對這一問題的提出和解決,不僅貫穿整個分析哲學(xué)的形成和發(fā)展,也彰顯著分析哲學(xué)整體的獨特思維模式。由于維特根斯坦的意義觀在分析哲學(xué)意義領(lǐng)域占有舉足輕重的地位,所以對維特根斯坦的意義觀的研究顯得尤為重要。維特根斯坦對意義的探討貫穿其全部哲學(xué),并且內(nèi)在于截然相反的前后期哲學(xué)形成了形式相異的兩種意義觀——“圖像論意義觀”和“用法論意義觀”。前期的“圖像論意義觀”以語言的邏輯圖像性質(zhì)作為語言意義的存在基礎(chǔ);進(jìn)而以“命題——事實”與“名字——對象”的意義產(chǎn)生方式為契機(jī),探討語言意義的確定性問題;并且通過對語言意義的“不可說”性質(zhì)的界定反諷形而上學(xué)家的理論臆想;同時以對“無意義”的哲學(xué)問題的消解來宣告哲學(xué)任務(wù)的終結(jié)。后期的“用法論意義觀”是在對傳統(tǒng)的“奧古斯丁圖畫”式的意義觀及早期的“圖像論意義觀”的批判前提下提出的,并且以“語言游戲”這一隱喻為基礎(chǔ),主張“意義即用法”這一核心觀點;又由對意義問題的再反思提出語言游戲的“錯位”是誘發(fā)“哲學(xué)病”的新主張,同時進(jìn)一步表明遵守語言的“深層用法”是治療頑疾的良藥。最后,通過對維特根斯坦前后期哲學(xué)之意義觀的分析比較,可以明顯的感受到二者的巨大差異;而這種差異的背后則折射出維特根斯坦前后期哲學(xué)思維方式的轉(zhuǎn)變。顯然,認(rèn)識和認(rèn)清這種轉(zhuǎn)變,對于研究維特根斯坦不同時期意義理論的基本形態(tài)以及更好地理解后者對前者的超越有著決定性的作用。
[Abstract]:The theory of meaning is the core of analytic philosophy. The reason is that the problem of meaning is the first problem that the analytic philosopher has to face and must try to solve. It not only runs through the formation and development of the whole analytic philosophy, but also highlights the unique thinking mode of the whole philosophy of analysis. Wittgenstein's sense of meaning occupies an important position in the analysis of philosophical meaning, so the study of Wittgenstein's sense of meaning is particularly important. Wittgenstein's discussion of meaning runs through all his philosophy, and it lies in the opposite period of philosophy formed in the form of two different forms of meaning. "Image theory" and "usage sense of meaning". The "image theory of meaning" as the basis of linguistic meaning is the basis of language meaning in the early period of "image theory of meaning", and then taking the way of "propositional fact" and "name object" as an opportunity to explore the determinacy of language meaning; and through the language meaning. The "unspeakable" character defines the theory of ironical metaphysics, and at the same time proclaims the end of the philosophical task with the dispelling of the philosophical problem of "meaningless". The later "usage theory" is based on the critical premise of the traditional "Augustin picture" meaning and the early "view of image meaning". And then, based on the metaphor of "language game", it advocates the core view of "meaning is usages", and a rethinking of the question of meaning that the "dislocation" of the language game is a new proposition to induce the "philosophical disease", and further shows that the "deep usage" of the language is a good medicine for the treatment of the stubborn diseases. The analysis and comparison of Wittgenstein's philosophy of meaning in the front and back period can obviously feel the great difference between the two, and the difference reflects the transformation of Wittgenstein's philosophical thinking mode in the back and back period. It is obvious that the basic form of the study of Wittgenstein's theory of meaning in different periods is to understand and recognize this transformation. And a better understanding of the latter plays a decisive role in the transcendence of the former.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B561.59

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 李大強(qiáng);;錯位、反諷與哲學(xué)病——語言游戲的誤解與誤用[J];晉陽學(xué)刊;2014年04期

2 李大強(qiáng);;上帝與勺子——《邏輯哲學(xué)論》中的指稱關(guān)系[J];社會科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;2011年05期

3 韓林合;維特根斯坦論“語言游戲”和“生活形式”[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1996年01期

，

本文編號：1830073