發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-07 14:46

  本文選題：低價(jià)藥品 + 掛網(wǎng)采購(gòu)　； 參考：《中國(guó)衛(wèi)生事業(yè)管理》2015年08期

【摘要】：目的:為進(jìn)一步完善低價(jià)藥品采購(gòu)政策提供參考。方法:通過(guò)各省藥品招標(biāo)采購(gòu)中心、各省衛(wèi)計(jì)委官網(wǎng)收集28個(gè)省市低價(jià)藥品掛網(wǎng)采購(gòu)政策文件,并根據(jù)研究目的,對(duì)部分指標(biāo)進(jìn)行比較分析。結(jié)果:71%的省市低價(jià)藥品的掛網(wǎng)模式為直接掛網(wǎng)采購(gòu),21%的省市實(shí)行掛網(wǎng)采購(gòu)結(jié)合經(jīng)濟(jì)技術(shù)標(biāo)評(píng)審的模式,少數(shù)省市在雙信封評(píng)審后直接掛網(wǎng);低價(jià)藥品企業(yè)或產(chǎn)品入圍規(guī)則方面,60%的省市在資質(zhì)審核合格后直接掛網(wǎng),20%的省市根據(jù)經(jīng)濟(jì)技術(shù)標(biāo)得分和申報(bào)企業(yè)的數(shù)量決定最后的掛網(wǎng)數(shù)量,個(gè)別省市根據(jù)經(jīng)濟(jì)技術(shù)標(biāo)得分或商務(wù)標(biāo)綜合得分決定掛網(wǎng)數(shù)量;限價(jià)方面,88%的省市以國(guó)家發(fā)展和改革委員會(huì)日均費(fèi)用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)為限價(jià)依據(jù),8%的省市以本省或其他幾個(gè)省市平均中標(biāo)價(jià)為參考價(jià)進(jìn)行限價(jià),僅有浙江一省以本省或其他幾個(gè)省市自2012年1月1日以來(lái)最低中標(biāo)價(jià)為參考價(jià)進(jìn)行限價(jià)。結(jié)論:我國(guó)低價(jià)藥品掛網(wǎng)采購(gòu)政策在解決低價(jià)藥品短缺的同時(shí),應(yīng)保證藥品的質(zhì)量;低價(jià)藥品企業(yè)或產(chǎn)品入圍規(guī)則的制定應(yīng)確保藥品供應(yīng)和可負(fù)擔(dān)性雙重目標(biāo)的實(shí)現(xiàn);低價(jià)藥品限價(jià)應(yīng)堅(jiān)持日均費(fèi)用標(biāo)準(zhǔn),但需要進(jìn)一步加以完善。
[Abstract]:Objective: to provide reference for the further improvement of low-price drug purchase policy. Methods: through the provincial drug bidding and purchasing centers and the official website of the provincial health and family planning commission, 28 provinces and cities were collected the documents of the purchase policy of the low price drugs linked to the network, and some indexes were compared and analyzed according to the research purpose. Results in 71% of the provinces and cities, 21% of the provinces and cities were directly connected with the net purchase, 21% of the provinces and cities carried out the evaluation of the net purchase combined with the economic and technical standard, and a few provinces and cities directly connected the network after the double envelopes evaluation. In terms of the entry rules for low-cost pharmaceutical enterprises or products, 60% of the provinces and cities directly link up the net after qualification examination and approval. 20% of the provinces and cities decide the final number of net hangers according to the score of economic and technological standards and the number of enterprises declared. Individual provinces and cities decide the number of netting according to the score of economic and technical standard or the comprehensive score of business standard; In terms of price limits, 88% of provinces and cities limit prices according to the National Development and Reform Commission's standard of daily average cost. 8% of provinces and cities limit prices by taking the average bid price of their province or several other provinces and cities as the reference price. Only one province in Zhejiang Province, or several other provinces and cities since January 1, 2012, the lowest bid as a reference price limit. Conclusion: in order to solve the shortage of low price drugs, the quality of drugs should be guaranteed, and the goal of drug supply and affordability should be realized. The limit price of low-price drugs should adhere to the standard of daily average cost, but need to be further improved.
【作者單位】： 山東大學(xué)衛(wèi)生管理與政策研究中心;
【基金】：國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目”基于交易費(fèi)用理論的基本藥物供應(yīng)保障模式政策優(yōu)化研究-以山東省農(nóng)村地區(qū)為例”(編號(hào):71203124)
【分類號(hào)】：R95

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 王國(guó)華;;服務(wù)民生 助力醫(yī)改 低價(jià)藥改再啟新篇[J];價(jià)格理論與實(shí)踐;2014年05期

2 徐偉;藥品限價(jià)的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];中國(guó)藥業(yè);2002年12期

3 趙小聰;淺談醫(yī)院藥品質(zhì)量管理[J];中國(guó)衛(wèi)生事業(yè)管理;2003年07期

4 李潔;葉凱;;我國(guó)藥品政府定價(jià)制度分析及完善策略[J];中國(guó)衛(wèi)生事業(yè)管理;2013年02期

5 黃芳;周香君;黃亮;馬慶華;馬亞娜;;基本藥物制度執(zhí)行后對(duì)社區(qū)居民用藥行為的影響分析[J];中國(guó)衛(wèi)生事業(yè)管理;2013年07期

6 呂佳;羅震e，

本文編號(hào)：2105293