【摘要】：伊格爾頓的悲劇研究每每由理論而談現(xiàn)實,字里行間飽含對男男女女的悲憫之情,充溢著強烈的政治關懷。這種馬克思主義人道主義的立場,堪稱理解伊格爾頓悲劇論述不可或缺的一把鑰匙。而有研究者竟認為,神義論為其悲劇理論的邏輯立場�？计渌鶕�(jù),實屬望文生義。在《甜蜜的暴力——悲劇的觀念》一著中,伊格爾頓曾逐一點評過包括神義論在內的諸多關于苦痛價值的觀點,常常通過實例揭露其不當或荒謬。伊格爾頓還在其他著作中,或詳或略地批判了不同形態(tài)的神義論。在討論邪惡問題時,伊格爾頓也有斷章取義的瑕疵。
[Abstract]:Eagleton's tragic studies often talk about reality by theory, and the lines are full of compassion for men and women, and full of strong political concern. This Marxist humanitarian position is an indispensable key to the understanding of Eagleton's tragic discourse. However, some researchers think that the theory of God-righteousness is the logical standpoint of his tragic theory. The examination of its basis, is in fact civilized. In "Sweet violence-the concept of tragedy", Eagleton reviews many viewpoints on the value of suffering, including theology, often through examples to expose its impropriety or absurdity. Eagleton, in other works, criticizes in detail or slightly the different forms of theocracy. In discussing evil, Eagleton also has a flaw out of context.
【作者單位】： 福建社會科學院文學所;
【分類號】：I561.06

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 郭曉霞;;艾麗斯·沃克對基督教神義論的顛覆——以《紫顏色》為例[J];濱州學院學報;2014年02期

，

本文編號：2149649