本文選題：魏晉南北朝美學 + 形�。� 參考：《山東社會科學》2017年07期

【摘要】：莊子和慧遠等人對"形""神"概念的使用是不適當?shù)?從而導(dǎo)致人們對"形""神"意義及二者關(guān)系的理解存在錯誤和混亂。"形""神"關(guān)系是邏輯和概念上的必然關(guān)系而不是在經(jīng)驗事實中的并存關(guān)系。"傳神"的意義在語法上已經(jīng)蘊含在"寫形"的概念中,因此"神似"即"形似"。對"形""神"概念的誤用通常有兩個表現(xiàn):一是用"形""神"分別指稱兩個不同的對象或一個對象的兩個部分,這導(dǎo)致人們把"傳神"理解成與"寫形"不同的創(chuàng)作方法。二是用"形""神"分別指稱對象的特征和主體的精神,把"形似"理解成對象的特征,把"神似"理解成"風骨"和"風力"。事實上劉勰和鐘嶸所說的"形似"同時就是對象的"神似",而"風骨""風力"則是主體的思想情感形態(tài)。
[Abstract]:The use of the concept of "form" and "God" by Zhuangzi and Huiyuan and others is inappropriate, which leads to the misunderstanding and confusion of the meaning of "form" and "God" and the relationship between them. "The "God" relationship is a logical and conceptual necessity rather than a co-existence in empirical facts.The meaning of "vivid" has been embodied in the concept of "writing form" in grammar, so "divine resemblance" is "likeness".The misuse of the concept of "form" and "god" usually has two manifestations: one is to refer to two different objects or two parts of one object by using "form" and "god", which leads people to interpret "evocative" as a creative method different from "writing form".The second is to use the "form" and "God" to refer to the characteristics of the object and the spirit of the subject, to understand the "likeness" as the characteristic of the object, and to interpret the "likeness of the god" as the "wind strength" and "wind force".In fact, Liu Xie and Zhong Rong's "likeness" is the object's "god similarity" at the same time, while "wind strength" and "wind force" are the subject's ideological and emotional forms.
【作者單位】： 青島大學文學院;山東社會科學院文化產(chǎn)業(yè)研究所;
【分類號】：H131

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 陳嘉映;;談?wù)劸S特根斯坦的“哲學語法”(續(xù))[J];世界哲學;2011年04期

【共引文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 趙建章;趙迎芳;;魏晉南北朝美學“形”“神”范疇的語法分析[J];山東社會科學;2017年07期

【二級參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 杝嘉映;;普遍性:同與通[J];中國文化;2010年01期

2 陳嘉映;;語言轉(zhuǎn)向之后[J];江蘇社會科學;2009年05期

3 陳嘉映;;哲學之為窮理[J];中山大學學報(社會科學版);2008年06期

，

本文編號：1732875