本文選題：情態(tài)副詞　切入點(diǎn)：非得　出處：《延邊大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文主要運(yùn)用三個(gè)平面理論對(duì)現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)中的"非得"進(jìn)行詳細(xì)的考察,根據(jù)情態(tài)的基本概念確定其情態(tài)副詞的地位,并對(duì)其進(jìn)行語(yǔ)義、句法及語(yǔ)用方面的分析。文章分為五部分:第一章緒論部分,主要介紹研究目的及意義、研究對(duì)象及范圍,確定"非得"的情態(tài)副詞地位,綜述研究現(xiàn)狀,并對(duì)文章的研究方法和語(yǔ)料來(lái)源做了說(shuō)明。第二章先分析"非"和"得"各自的語(yǔ)義,然后重點(diǎn)分析"非得"表達(dá)的三種情態(tài)義,即動(dòng)力情態(tài)、道義情態(tài)和認(rèn)識(shí)情態(tài)。動(dòng)力情態(tài)表達(dá)當(dāng)事人或說(shuō)話人的主觀意愿;道義情態(tài)一方面表達(dá)情理事理上的必要性,另一方面表達(dá)說(shuō)話人的指令;認(rèn)識(shí)情態(tài)則表達(dá)說(shuō)話人的主觀判斷。此外本章節(jié)還簡(jiǎn)要分析了"非得"和"非","非得"和"非得X不可"的語(yǔ)義側(cè)重點(diǎn)的不同。第三章對(duì)"非得"進(jìn)行句法方面的分析,"非得"在句法分布上大部分位于主謂之間,句法功能上它主要是作狀語(yǔ),但并不是單純地作狀語(yǔ),而是具有述謂性。"非得"與體標(biāo)記"了"、"著"、"過(guò)"搭配時(shí)具有不同的情態(tài)義,并不存在內(nèi)部的一致性。"非得"和副詞"就"的共現(xiàn)頻率較高,和副詞"也"、"還"的共現(xiàn)頻率次之,它們?cè)谡Z(yǔ)義上相融,都具有主觀性。一些因素還能幫助我們判斷"非得"表達(dá)的情態(tài)義,如人稱、"不可"的有無(wú)、事件的性質(zhì)、和"要"的搭配、假設(shè)復(fù)句的影響以及否定形式等。第四章考察"非得"在語(yǔ)用方面的表現(xiàn),語(yǔ)氣上"非得"主要用于陳述語(yǔ)氣,其次是疑問(wèn)語(yǔ)氣,祈使語(yǔ)氣使用最少。言語(yǔ)行為上,"非得"表達(dá)動(dòng)力情態(tài)時(shí)主要涉及承諾行為和指令性行為;表達(dá)道義情態(tài)時(shí)主要涉及指令性行為和表述性言語(yǔ)行為;表達(dá)認(rèn)識(shí)情態(tài)時(shí)則只涉及表述性言語(yǔ)行為。此外"非得"還具有突出焦點(diǎn)、強(qiáng)化口氣的作用。最后是結(jié)語(yǔ)部分,對(duì)本篇論文做最后的總結(jié)說(shuō)明,并指出了論文的不足以及需要進(jìn)一步探討的問(wèn)題。
[Abstract]:This paper mainly uses three plane theories to make a detailed investigation of the "must" in modern Chinese, determines the status of its modal adverbs according to the basic concept of modality, and carries on the semantics to them. The thesis is divided into five parts: the first chapter introduces the purpose and significance of the research, the object and scope of the study, the status of the modal adverb "must", and summarizes the current situation of the research. The second chapter first analyzes the semantics of "no" and "get", and then analyzes the three modal meanings expressed by "must", that is, dynamic modality. Moral modality and cognitive modality. Dynamic modality expresses the subjective will of the person concerned or the speaker; on the one hand, the moral modality expresses the necessity of reasonableness, on the other hand, it expresses the instruction of the speaker. Cognitive modality expresses the subjective judgment of the speaker. In addition, this chapter briefly analyzes the differences between the semantic emphases of "do" and "no", "need" and "do X". Chapter three deals with syntactic aspects of "need". The syntactic distribution of "compulsory" is mostly between subject-predicate, In syntactic function, it is mainly used as adverbial, but not simply as adverbial, but as predicate. "must" and "aspect" "," "Zhe", "too" have different modal meanings when collocation. There is no internal consistency. The co-occurrence frequency of "must" and adverb "just" is higher, and the frequency of co-occurrence of adverb "also" and "return" is second. Some factors can also help us to judge the modal meaning of "must", such as the person, the existence or not of "not", the nature of the event, and the combination of "want" and "want". The fourth chapter examines the pragmatic performance of "must", in which "must" is mainly used for declarative mood, followed by interrogative mood. In terms of speech act, the expression of "must" mainly involves the act of commitment and the act of instruction, while the expression of moral modality mainly involves the act of instruction and the act of expression of speech. In order to express the understanding of modality, it only involves expressive speech act. In addition, "must" also has a prominent focus and strengthens the function of tone. Finally, it is the conclusion part, which makes the final summary and explanation of this paper. It also points out the deficiency of the thesis and the problems that need to be further explored.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：H146.3
，

本文編號(hào)：1681368