【摘要】：量詞是漢語中最具特色的一類詞匯，個(gè)體量詞作為其中最重要的一部分，逐漸成為學(xué)者們研究的對(duì)象。隨著認(rèn)知語言學(xué)的興起，用認(rèn)知理論對(duì)漢語的本體進(jìn)行研究，也成為研究的熱點(diǎn)。本文從認(rèn)知角度出發(fā)，，對(duì)現(xiàn)代漢語中的具有代表性的幾個(gè)個(gè)體量詞進(jìn)行了認(rèn)知分析。認(rèn)為個(gè)體量詞和名詞的搭配是有認(rèn)知理據(jù)的，并不是傳統(tǒng)理論的“約定俗成”。探索了隱藏在其背后的漢民族的獨(dú)特思維習(xí)慣與認(rèn)知方式，揭示了個(gè)體量詞與名物組合的認(rèn)知理據(jù)。這樣不但可以保護(hù)漢民族語言的純潔性，也可以有助于漢語個(gè)體量詞的學(xué)習(xí)和使用。 本論一共分為六部分。第一部分是引言部分，在這一部分中主要介紹了個(gè)體量詞的研究現(xiàn)狀、選題意義以及本文的研究范圍、方法和語料來源。 第二部分是相關(guān)研究的概述。在這一部分中主要分為量詞的定名研究和約定俗成理論及其影響。這一部分主要闡述了量詞定名的歷程和價(jià)值，以及在“約定俗成”理論的影響下的量詞的研究成果及其局限性。 第三部分是個(gè)體量詞研究的認(rèn)知理論基礎(chǔ)研究。這一部分分為“量”的認(rèn)知、語言與認(rèn)知、范疇和范疇化、隱喻和轉(zhuǎn)喻、意象圖式、象似性六部分，都是認(rèn)識(shí)語言學(xué)中最基本的概念，也是本文研究要用到認(rèn)知理論基礎(chǔ)。 第四部分是個(gè)體量詞的界定及發(fā)展演變研究。主要包括個(gè)體量詞的界定、演變和產(chǎn)生原因三個(gè)部分。界定和演變是對(duì)個(gè)體量詞的進(jìn)行的本體研究，產(chǎn)生原因部分是從語言的結(jié)構(gòu)和漢民族的認(rèn)知思維入手，探求個(gè)體量詞產(chǎn)生的原因。 第五部分是認(rèn)知視角下漢語個(gè)體量詞個(gè)案研究。選取的具有特點(diǎn)和代表性的常用個(gè)案是“個(gè)”、“條”、“把”、“本”。在此部分中對(duì)選取的量詞“個(gè)”、“條”、“把”、“本”進(jìn)行逐個(gè)分析，并將“條”和“根”進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析，主要從詞義的發(fā)展演變本體研究和認(rèn)知視角下的解釋。 第六部分是結(jié)語部分。在這一部分中對(duì)全文進(jìn)行總結(jié)，并且從認(rèn)知機(jī)制的深入、方言個(gè)體量詞的研究和名量組合的理據(jù)性三個(gè)方面說明了當(dāng)前研究中出現(xiàn)的問題及未來發(fā)展的方向。 本論的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)主要是第四部分在對(duì)個(gè)體量詞的界定及發(fā)展演變研究中，主要包括界定、演變和產(chǎn)生原因三部分。其中前兩者是本體研究，產(chǎn)生原因部分是從語言結(jié)構(gòu)和漢民族的認(rèn)知思維入手。 同時(shí)在第五部分中對(duì)于認(rèn)知視角下的現(xiàn)代漢語個(gè)體量詞的個(gè)案研究中，對(duì)于常用個(gè)案進(jìn)行分析，一點(diǎn)帶面用以說明漢語中的個(gè)體量詞的產(chǎn)生和泛化應(yīng)用大多與民族認(rèn)知心理、隱喻等有著密切的關(guān)系，在認(rèn)知方面找到合理的解釋。 本論的不足之處集中在兩個(gè)方面，一是例證舉引的不夠廣泛；二是有關(guān)創(chuàng)新之處提出觀點(diǎn)后，實(shí)踐證明過程不夠充分，且研究思路偏重與理論角度，對(duì)語料的例舉和量化分析不是很充分。
[Abstract]:Quantifier is the most distinctive category of words in Chinese, and individual classifier, as the most important part of it, has gradually become the object of study by scholars. With the rise of cognitive linguistics, the study of Chinese Noumenon by cognitive theory has become a hot topic. From the perspective of cognition, this paper makes a cognitive analysis of several representative individual quantifiers in modern Chinese. The author thinks that the collocation of individual quantifiers and nouns has cognitive motivation, and is not a conventional theory. This paper explores the unique thinking habits and cognitive styles of the Han nationality hidden behind it, and reveals the cognitive motivation of the combination of individual quantifiers and names. This can not only protect the purity of the Chinese national language, but also contribute to the study and use of Chinese individual quantifiers. This theory is divided into six parts. The first part is the introduction. In this part, it mainly introduces the research status of individual quantifiers, the significance of the topic, the scope of this study, methods and the source of the corpus. The second part is the summary of related research. In this part, it is mainly divided into quantifier nominative research and generality theory and its influence. This part mainly expounds the process and value of quantifier naming, and the research results and limitations of quantifier under the influence of the theory of "established by convention". The third part is the basic research of cognitive theory of individual quantifier research. This part is divided into six parts: cognition of "quantity", language and cognition, category and categorization, metaphor and metonymy, image schema and iconicity. The fourth part is the definition and development of individual quantifiers. It mainly includes three parts: the definition of individual quantifiers, the evolution and the causes. The definition and evolution is the ontological study of individual quantifiers, and the reason is partly from the structure of language and the cognitive thinking of the Han nationality to explore the causes of individual quantifiers. The fifth part is a case study of Chinese individual quantifiers from a cognitive perspective. The typical and typical cases selected are "individual", "Article", "Ba", "Ben". In this part, the selected quantifiers "individual", "bar", "Ba", "Ben" are analyzed one by one, and the "article" and "root" are compared and analyzed, mainly from the perspective of the development and evolution of the meaning of the word and the explanation from the cognitive perspective. The sixth part is the conclusion. In this part, the author summarizes the full text, and explains the problems in the current research and the direction of future development from the perspective of cognitive mechanism, the research of individual quantifiers in dialects and the motivation of the combination of names and variables. The innovation of this theory is mainly the fourth part in the study of the definition and development of individual quantifiers, which mainly includes three parts: definition, evolution and reasons. The first two are Noumenon study, which comes from the language structure and the cognitive thinking of the Han nationality. At the same time, in the fifth part of the cognitive perspective of the individual quantifiers of modern Chinese case study, for the common case analysis, a point with a surface to explain the emergence and generalization of individual quantifiers in Chinese and the majority of the national cognitive psychology. Metaphor has a close relationship, in the cognitive aspect to find a reasonable explanation. The inadequacies of this theory are concentrated in two aspects, one is that the cited examples are not wide enough; Second, after putting forward the ideas of innovation, the practice proves that the process is not enough, and the research thought is focused on the theoretical angle, and the examples and quantitative analysis of the corpus are not sufficient.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：H146

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李先銀;漢語個(gè)體量詞的產(chǎn)生及其原因探討[J];保定師范�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2002年01期

2 郭曉沛;蔡文豐;于為;;淺談對(duì)外漢語量詞教學(xué)的現(xiàn)狀[J];長(zhǎng)春教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

3 熊仲儒;量詞“口”的句法認(rèn)知基礎(chǔ)淺探[J];巢湖學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

4 李清;對(duì)外漢語教學(xué)中漢語量詞的教學(xué)及其文化意蘊(yùn)[J];楚雄師專學(xué)報(bào);2000年04期

5 黃福洪;新英語量詞的新用法[J];大學(xué)英語;2002年02期

6 葉桂郴;量詞"頭"的歷時(shí)考察及其他稱量動(dòng)物的量詞[J];古漢語研究;2004年04期

7 李瑩;;漢語個(gè)體量詞產(chǎn)生的機(jī)制與動(dòng)因[J];湖北廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

8 黃艷君;漢英量詞對(duì)比[J];淮南職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年04期

9 韓漢雄;漢語量詞與英語表量詞[J];杭州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1980年02期

10 王曉玲;漢英量詞之比較[J];南京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年01期

本文編號(hào)：2372025