【摘要】： 90年代以來，在市場經(jīng)濟(jì)和社會轉(zhuǎn)型的影響下，隨著西方解構(gòu)主義思潮以及后現(xiàn)代話題的不斷輸入，文學(xué)創(chuàng)作與文學(xué)理論中人文精神的失落成為比較突出的問題�！叭宋木瘛贝笥懻�、“日常生活審美化”論爭就是針對人文精神失落而爆發(fā)的爭論，雖然“新理性精神”文藝?yán)碚撛缇吞岢眯吕硇匀ブ茖?dǎo)人文精神問題，但總起來說文藝?yán)碚摻鐚Υ说闹匾曔�不夠。弘揚(yáng)人文精神、用人文精神克服文藝日益庸俗化的傾向，是馬克思主義文藝?yán)碚撝袊膬r值坐標(biāo)，同時，文學(xué)創(chuàng)作與文藝?yán)碚撝腥宋木竦膶?shí)現(xiàn)也只有在馬克思主義文藝?yán)碚摰闹笇?dǎo)下才能落在實(shí)處。據(jù)此，本文立足于馬克思主義文藝?yán)碚撘殉醪街袊漠?dāng)代新人文傳統(tǒng)基礎(chǔ)上，立足于當(dāng)前中國文學(xué)、文論發(fā)展的現(xiàn)實(shí)語境，試圖從馬克思主義文藝?yán)碚撝袊囊曢撊ネ敢曔@兩場文藝?yán)碚摻绲拇笳摖�，努力用馬克思主義文藝?yán)碚摰幕驹瓌t給予科學(xué)的回答和創(chuàng)造性的闡釋。這也將是把馬克思主義文藝?yán)碚撝袊葡蛏钊�、提升到新高度的重要途徑之一�?本文共分上下兩篇。上篇圍繞“人文精神”大討論展開論述，共分四章。第一章主要講“人文精神”大討論中的主要觀點(diǎn)和基本問題。在“人文精神”大討論中出現(xiàn)了“失落論”和“非失論”的尖銳對立：“失落論”者認(rèn)為人文精神在當(dāng)代文學(xué)創(chuàng)作和批評中已全面喪失，“非失論”認(rèn)為人文精神并未喪失或者根本就沒存在過�！叭宋木瘛贝笥懻撝饕婕暗饺宋木竦膬�(nèi)涵、人文精神與知識分子、人文精神與市場經(jīng)濟(jì)、重建人文精神等基本問題。第二章主要講對“人文精神”大討論進(jìn)行反思的幾種主要觀點(diǎn)：有人認(rèn)為“人文精神”大討論具有強(qiáng)烈的現(xiàn)實(shí)針對性，理論意義和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義都很強(qiáng)；有人指責(zé)“人文精神”大討論務(wù)虛；有人認(rèn)為“人文精神”大討論具有本質(zhì)主義傾向；有人認(rèn)為“人文精神”大討論具有很強(qiáng)的意識形態(tài)性。第三章從馬克思主義文藝?yán)碚撝袊囊曢撏肝觥叭宋木瘛贝笥懻摚�，認(rèn)為人文精神的失落實(shí)質(zhì)是社會主義精神文明的失落，人文精神的問題不是知識分子一個階層的問題，要走出唯人文主義的誤區(qū)。人文精神只有以社會主義精神文明建設(shè)為依托，才能真正落在實(shí)處。第四章講在馬克思主義文藝?yán)碚撝袊笇?dǎo)下構(gòu)建人文精神的努力成果——新理性精神。新理性精神站在歷史唯物主義的立場上，凸顯審美的社會內(nèi)涵，倡導(dǎo)用理性精神規(guī)范、制導(dǎo)文學(xué)創(chuàng)作和批評中人文精神的失落，具有重要的理論價值和實(shí)際意義。下篇圍繞“日常生活審美化”論爭展開論述，共分三章。第五章主要述評“日常生活審美化”論爭中“新的美學(xué)原則”的崛起、被質(zhì)疑及相應(yīng)的辯護(hù)內(nèi)容。第六章主要從美學(xué)上解讀“日常生活”、“審美”、三個概念，力圖從理論上澄清它們原本內(nèi)涵。第七章從馬克思主義文藝?yán)碚撝袊囊曢撏肝觥叭粘Ｉ顚徝阑闭摖帲J(rèn)為“新的美學(xué)原則”取消藝術(shù)與生活的距離，將物質(zhì)現(xiàn)實(shí)直接等同于藝術(shù)，實(shí)質(zhì)上是取消美學(xué)原則、取消藝術(shù)�！靶碌拿缹W(xué)原則”聲稱要為美學(xué)的感性維度爭取地位，實(shí)質(zhì)上是混淆審美感性與感官欲望，客觀上起到了為當(dāng)下的欲望擴(kuò)張、感官刺激張目的作用。在文壇感性泛濫、感覺、感官至上的今天，“新的美學(xué)原則”還一味強(qiáng)調(diào)感性和感官的作用，是片面的美學(xué)原則，是文藝?yán)碚撝腥宋木袢笔У谋憩F(xiàn)。結(jié)語部分總結(jié)了“人文精神”大討論和“日常生活審美化”論爭，認(rèn)為文藝?yán)碚摰陌l(fā)展要以馬克思主義文藝?yán)碚摓橹笇?dǎo)，堅持文藝?yán)碚摰娜藢W(xué)維度，堅持文藝?yán)碚摰睦硇耘泄δ��！叭宋木瘛焙汀叭粘Ｉ顚徝阑闭摖幍倪^程也是馬克思主義文藝?yán)碚撝袊囊徊糠�。展望馬克思主義文藝?yán)碚撝袊娜宋木窠ㄔO(shè)，應(yīng)從人文精神的全球語境、世俗語境和傳統(tǒng)語境來著手進(jìn)行。
[Abstract]:Since the 1990s, with the influence of the market economy and the social transformation, the loss of the humanistic spirit in the literary creation and the literary theory has become a more prominent problem with the trend of western deconstruction and the continuous input of the post-modern topic. The debate on "the great discussion of the humanistic spirit and the aestheticization of daily life" is the debate about the loss of the humanistic spirit. Although the new rational spirit "literature and art theory has long advocated the use of the new rational to guide the humanistic spirit, the theoretical circle of literature and art has not paid enough attention to it. To carry forward the humanistic spirit, to use the humanistic spirit to overcome the increasingly vulgar tendency of literature and art, is the value coordinate of the sinicization of the theory of Marxist literature and art, at the same time, the realization of the humanistic spirit in the literary creation and the theory of literature and art can only fall under the guidance of the Marxist theory of literature and art. On the basis of this, this paper, based on the present new humanism tradition, which has been preliminarily sinicized by the theory of Marxist literature and art, is based on the realistic context of the development of Chinese literature and literary theory, and tries to see from the perspective of the sinicization of the Chinese literature and art theory, Try to give a scientific answer and a creative explanation with the basic principles of Marxist literature and art theory. This will also be one of the important ways to push the sinicization of the Marxist theory of literature and art into the depth and to the new height. This article The article is divided into two parts, and the last part is about the "great discussion and development of the humanistic spirit" This part is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is the main view in the "humanistic spirit" of large-scale discussion The point and the basic question. In the "great discussion of the humanistic spirit, the sharp contrast of the loss theory and the non-loss theory" appeared: the "lost theory" thought that the humanistic spirit had been completely lost in the creation and criticism of the contemporary literature, and the non-loss theory thought that the humanistic spirit had not been lost or the root The great discussion of the humanistic spirit mainly involves the connotation of the humanistic spirit, the humanistic spirit and the intellectual, the humanistic spirit and the market economy, and the reconstruction of the human essence. The second chapter mainly focuses on the main points of reflection on the "great discussion of the humanistic spirit": some people think that the "big discussion of the humanistic spirit" has a strong realistic, realistic, theoretical and practical significance, and it has been accused of "trunk>" human spirit " 【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：I0

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 金建吾;韓國歷史題材電視劇研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2011年

2 劉若斌;蘇軾“自我超越”的人文精神初探[D];山東師范大學(xué);2008年

本文編號：2486810