本文選題：弗萊 + 文學(xué)發(fā)展循環(huán)論��； 參考：《黑龍江大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：諾斯洛普·弗萊，這位20世紀(jì)最引人注目的文學(xué)批評(píng)家從文學(xué)作品反復(fù)出現(xiàn)的敘事結(jié)構(gòu)與意象中發(fā)現(xiàn)了文學(xué)循環(huán)發(fā)展的規(guī)律，探索到其中隱藏的動(dòng)因，揭示出文學(xué)的發(fā)展是沿著一個(gè)環(huán)行軌道運(yùn)行。在世界文學(xué)漫長(zhǎng)的發(fā)展歷程中，文學(xué)作品在創(chuàng)作的主題和意象等許多方面都存在著自身置換變形與回歸的現(xiàn)象。文學(xué)的循環(huán)過程不僅具有獨(dú)創(chuàng)性與模仿性，還具有自動(dòng)化的傾向，也就是說文學(xué)循環(huán)可以脫離主體創(chuàng)造自動(dòng)發(fā)展。弗萊從生命和自然界的循環(huán)中得到啟示，將文學(xué)的演變看成是類似自然界盛衰更迭的過程。弗萊的文學(xué)循環(huán)發(fā)展論最終使其全部理論成為一個(gè)有機(jī)整體，他以廣義的視角來審視人類的文化和思想，認(rèn)為文學(xué)的演變具有節(jié)奏性，可以從自然界的循環(huán)中派生并最終產(chǎn)生出四種文學(xué)類型。弗萊在強(qiáng)調(diào)文學(xué)發(fā)展具有節(jié)奏性、文學(xué)現(xiàn)象更迭具有必然性的同時(shí)，還強(qiáng)調(diào)了文學(xué)的發(fā)展是按照規(guī)定模式發(fā)展，具有固定性。文學(xué)所具備的這些性質(zhì)統(tǒng)一構(gòu)成文學(xué)發(fā)展的“矛盾性”，弗萊將這種帶有“矛盾性”的文學(xué)循環(huán)方式歸根結(jié)底解釋為文學(xué)原型的變形與回歸，以及文學(xué)本身自覺自在自動(dòng)的發(fā)展循環(huán)的結(jié)果，借以重新審視文學(xué)與神話，，文學(xué)與宗教，文學(xué)與意識(shí)形態(tài)的關(guān)系。 在當(dāng)代美學(xué)研究視野中，文學(xué)演變發(fā)展的形式十分常見，弗萊把文學(xué)循環(huán)發(fā)展作為審視文學(xué)藝術(shù)發(fā)生、發(fā)展的一個(gè)重要視角，試圖發(fā)現(xiàn)文學(xué)作品中反復(fù)出現(xiàn)的意象、敘事結(jié)構(gòu)、人物類型背后的基本形式，同時(shí)將這些形式當(dāng)成評(píng)論文學(xué)作品、衡量作品意義的一個(gè)重要標(biāo)志。這樣的視角，對(duì)于世界文學(xué)的理性分析和歸納，對(duì)于文學(xué)藝術(shù)發(fā)展方向的總結(jié)和概括，都具有獨(dú)特的文化意蘊(yùn)和美學(xué)價(jià)值。弗萊對(duì)于文學(xué)循環(huán)發(fā)展規(guī)律的解釋具有獨(dú)創(chuàng)性，為文學(xué)批評(píng)與文藝?yán)碚撗芯康陌l(fā)展提供了一種新視野，弗萊所提出的“文學(xué)循環(huán)論”與“原型批評(píng)美學(xué)”在今日仍然對(duì)于文學(xué)、美學(xué)的研究具有啟發(fā)性和研究意義。本文希望以美學(xué)視角來重新審視弗萊所建構(gòu)的文學(xué)發(fā)展觀。
[Abstract]:Northrop Frye, the most remarkable literary critic in the 20th century, discovered the law of the development of literary cycle from the narrative structure and image of literary works, and explored the hidden causes. It is revealed that the development of literature is running along a circular track. In the long course of the development of world literature, there is a phenomenon of self-displacement and regression in many aspects of literary works, such as the theme and image of creation. The cycle process of literature not only has originality and imitation, but also has the tendency of automation, that is to say, literary cycle can develop automatically without subject creation. Frey was inspired by the cycle of life and nature and regarded the evolution of literature as a process similar to the rise and fall of nature. Frey's theory of the development of literary cycle finally makes all his theories become an organic whole. He examines human culture and thought from a broad perspective and thinks that the evolution of literature is rhythmic. Four literary types can be derived from the cycle of nature. While emphasizing the rhythm of literary development and the inevitability of literary change, Fry also emphasizes that the development of literature is developed according to the prescribed mode and has a fixed character. The unity of these properties of literature constitutes the "contradiction" of literary development, which Frye interpreted in the final analysis as the transformation and return of literary archetypes. And the result of the self-conscious and automatic development cycle of literature itself, so as to re-examine the relationship between literature and mythology, literature and religion, literature and ideology. In the field of contemporary aesthetic research, the forms of literary evolution and development are very common. Fry regards the development of literature cycle as an important angle of view to examine the occurrence and development of literature and art, and tries to find the image and narrative structure that appear repeatedly in literary works. At the same time, it regards these forms as an important symbol to evaluate literary works and measure the meaning of works. This angle of view has unique cultural implication and aesthetic value for the rational analysis and induction of world literature and for the summary and generalization of the development direction of literature and art. Frye's explanation of the law of literary cycle development is original and provides a new vision for the development of literary criticism and literary theory. Fry's "Literary cycle Theory" and "archetypal critical Aesthetics" are still for literature today. The study of aesthetics is instructive and significant. This article hopes to re-examine Fry's literary development concept from an aesthetic perspective.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：I01

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 陸漢軍;論原型批評(píng)的建立[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2005年07期

2 葉舒憲;神話-原型批評(píng)的理論與實(shí)踐(上)[J];陜西師大學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1986年02期

本文編號(hào)：1823002