本文關(guān)鍵詞： 布迪厄 文化美學(xué) 符號(hào)實(shí)踐 文學(xué)場(chǎng) 符號(hào)權(quán)力 反觀性　出處：《江西師范大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 布迪厄是國(guó)際上具有重要影響力的人文學(xué)者,他學(xué)術(shù)視野寬廣,對(duì)于文學(xué)藝術(shù)、美學(xué)、文化學(xué)等都提出了一系列獨(dú)特的見(jiàn)解。本文將布迪厄這些方面的內(nèi)容概述為“文化美學(xué)”,并運(yùn)用符號(hào)學(xué)的視角對(duì)其加以審視,以期揭示他的文化美學(xué)在符號(hào)學(xué)視域的重要價(jià)值。 在理論建構(gòu)上,布迪厄創(chuàng)造性地運(yùn)用了一系列概念體系以及方法論,其中“符號(hào)實(shí)踐”(象征性實(shí)踐)作為核心范疇表現(xiàn)為人類實(shí)際生活所創(chuàng)造的各種符號(hào)和意義系統(tǒng)。布迪厄在社會(huì)資本的區(qū)分中,提出了“符號(hào)資本”概念,以強(qiáng)調(diào)符號(hào)在資本流轉(zhuǎn)中的特殊意義。布迪厄又闡釋符號(hào)權(quán)力概念,指出符號(hào)實(shí)際上成為構(gòu)筑社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)與秩序的基石、實(shí)現(xiàn)“軟性”統(tǒng)治的利器。布迪厄以空間(即場(chǎng)域)概念來(lái)避免空泛的社會(huì)分析,提出文化符號(hào)在復(fù)雜的網(wǎng)狀的場(chǎng)域內(nèi)互動(dòng)、斗爭(zhēng),文學(xué)藝術(shù)的美學(xué)意義在場(chǎng)域內(nèi)產(chǎn)生。在文學(xué)分析上,布迪厄重點(diǎn)探討了“文學(xué)場(chǎng)”理論,他所認(rèn)同的“藝術(shù)的法則”是對(duì)文學(xué)、藝術(shù)本身的經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)基礎(chǔ)進(jìn)行批判,超越內(nèi)部研究與外部研究的分野,走“綜合分析”之路。
[Abstract]:Bourdieu is one of the most influential humanities scholars in the world. He has a wide range of academic horizons, and he has a wide range of views on literature, art and aesthetics. This paper summarizes Bourdieu's contents as "cultural aesthetics" and examines it from the perspective of semiotics in order to reveal the important value of his cultural aesthetics in the field of semiotics. In theory construction, Bourdieu creatively applied a series of conceptual systems and methodology. Among them, "symbolic practice" (symbolic practice), as the core category, is represented by various symbols and meaning systems created by human beings' actual life. In the differentiation of social capital, Bourdieu puts forward the concept of "symbolic capital". In order to emphasize the special significance of symbol in capital transfer, Bourdieu explained the concept of symbolic power and pointed out that symbol has actually become the cornerstone of social structure and order. Bourdieu uses the concept of space (field) to avoid vague social analysis, and proposes that cultural symbols interact and struggle in the complex network of fields. In literary analysis, Bourdieu focuses on the theory of "literary field", which he agrees with is a critique of the economic and social basis of literature and art itself. Transcend the distinction between internal research and external research, and take the road of "comprehensive analysis".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號(hào)】：I01

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 朱國(guó)華;;祛魅、解構(gòu)與大眾文化的自主性——當(dāng)代語(yǔ)境中的布迪厄美學(xué)社會(huì)學(xué)理論[J];文學(xué)評(píng)論;2006年06期

2 徐賁;文化批評(píng)理論的跨語(yǔ)境轉(zhuǎn)換問(wèn)題[J];文藝研究;2002年04期

3 張意;文化與誤識(shí):符號(hào)權(quán)力的巫術(shù)[J];文藝研究;2003年02期

4 徐賁;文化“場(chǎng)域”中的福樓拜[J];中國(guó)比較文學(xué);2003年04期

5 李幼蒸;中國(guó)哲學(xué)和符號(hào)學(xué)[J];世界哲學(xué);2003年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1516369