本文關(guān)鍵詞： 海德格爾 藝術(shù) 美 美學(xué)　出處：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2003年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 本文在《海德格爾與美學(xué)》這個(gè)題目下進(jìn)行了一場逼問式的研究，這個(gè)研究圍繞著這樣一個(gè)中心展開：“存在之思”中的藝術(shù)與美。這個(gè)研究試圖弄明白：海德格爾關(guān)于美、藝術(shù)、詩、美學(xué)史等問題的看法對(duì)于西方美學(xué)產(chǎn)生了何種樣的影響，解決了什么樣的問題，他的新的思想方法為美學(xué)的發(fā)展提供了什么樣的啟示；反過來，美學(xué)又幫助海德格爾完成了什么的任務(wù)？對(duì)藝術(shù)與美學(xué)的問題的思考在海德格爾的全部思想中起到了什么的作用？同時(shí)，海德格爾作為一位深受中國思想影響的西方思想家，他的思想對(duì)于中國美學(xué)又有什么樣的意義？ 這樣一種研究要求我們對(duì)海德格爾的總體思想和他對(duì)藝術(shù)與美的思考做細(xì)致地分析和嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)?shù)赝普摚悍治鲆馕吨覀円阉拿琅c藝術(shù)之思以及這樣一種思考的結(jié)論還原到他的思想整體中去，從而為他的結(jié)論，特別是關(guān)于美、藝術(shù)以及詩的一些結(jié)論式的論述找到根據(jù)，然后以這些根據(jù)為出發(fā)點(diǎn)反觀這些結(jié)論的實(shí)質(zhì)和意義；推論意味著，我們要把這些論述和新的思考還原到美學(xué)史去，還原到美學(xué)的問題史中去，在一些具體的美學(xué)問題上，通過和一些美學(xué)史上的重要命題作比較，通過相互印證，從而推導(dǎo)出海德格爾的這些論述對(duì)美學(xué)史的意義和對(duì)于美學(xué)自身發(fā)展的意義。 研究的真正困難不在于得出一個(gè)什么樣的結(jié)論，而在于得出結(jié)論的過程。我們的目的，是把我們所理解的海德格爾擺出來，讓他現(xiàn)身在場，迫使他與美學(xué)進(jìn)行一場對(duì)話。同時(shí)，我們也對(duì)海德格爾進(jìn)行了一場逼索，對(duì)一些海德格爾有所涉及卻又不甚明晰的看法做出一個(gè)更加深入的闡發(fā)，說出他可能會(huì)說但卻沒有說的話來。這就要求我們一方面必須對(duì)海德格爾的思想有一個(gè)總體上的把握，一方面也要進(jìn)行創(chuàng)造性的闡釋。我們的題目不允許我們把注意力完全集中到海德格爾關(guān)于藝術(shù)、美、詩等的言論中，不允許我們滿足于對(duì)其藝術(shù)之思的梳理，也不允許我們完全把海德格爾納入西方美學(xué)史中，因此我們不得不以多條線，以復(fù)調(diào)的形式展開我們的研究。一方面，，我們需要闡釋和分析海德格爾關(guān)于藝術(shù)、美學(xué)、詩等的思想，把這些思想與他的整體思想結(jié)合與來，去關(guān)注他思考這些問題的基本出發(fā)點(diǎn)，而不是停留在表面意義上；另一方面我們必須不斷地把這些思想與歐洲的美學(xué)傳統(tǒng)結(jié)合起來看，我們必須弄清這些思想究竟解決了或者提出了哪些美學(xué)問題，對(duì)于美學(xué)的發(fā)展具有什么樣的意義。因此，我們的研究就是沿著概述、分析、質(zhì)疑、還原、比較、申發(fā)這 WP=6 樣一條道路對(duì)海德格爾的每一個(gè)有關(guān)于美和藝術(shù)的命題做出積極的理解，并以一種積極的態(tài)度將其最富創(chuàng)造性的思想方法引入美學(xué)中來。 由于海德格爾思想的寬廣與深邃，我們的研究被相應(yīng)拓展開了，結(jié)合海德格爾的具體論述，我們研究涉及到了美學(xué)的性質(zhì)，美學(xué)的思想方法，研究了關(guān)于美、美學(xué)、美學(xué)史、藝術(shù)、詩等等基本的美學(xué)問題。另外我們還研究了藝術(shù)之思在海德格爾總體思想中的地位與意義，研究了海德格爾思想對(duì)中國美學(xué)的意義，這是一個(gè)在更加深入和更加宏大的視野中對(duì)海德格爾思想對(duì)于美學(xué)的意義所做的開放式的研究。
[Abstract]:In this paper the title of Heidegger < > and aesthetics for a push type research, this study centers around this center: "thinking" in art and beauty. This study attempts to understand Heidegger about beauty, art, poetry, aesthetics history views influence what for the kind of western aesthetics, solves the problem of what his new method provides what kind of enlightenment for the development of aesthetics and aesthetics; in turn, help Heidegger completed what task? Thinking of art and aesthetic problems played what role in all at the same time, Heidegger's thought of? Heidegger as a western thinker by China thought influence, his thought has what meaning for China aesthetics?
Such a study requires us to the overall thought of Heidegger and his thoughts of art and beauty do detailed analysis and rigorous reasoning: analysis of means - we should put his beauty and art thinking and the conclusion of this kind of thinking to restore his thoughts to the whole, so as to his conclusion, especially on the United States, discusses some conclusion and the art of poetry to find, and then taking these according to the essence and significance as the starting point in these conclusions; inference means that we need to discuss these and new thinking to restore aesthetic history to restore to the problem in the history of aesthetics to aesthetics in some specific issues through some important propositions, and the history of aesthetics by comparing with each other, to derive the Heidegger that discuss the history of aesthetics and aesthetic significance for their own development.
The real difficulty is not that of what kind of a conclusion, which is the conclusion of the process. Our purpose is to our understanding of Heidegger put out, let him out there, forcing him to engage in a dialogue with aesthetics. At the same time, we also carried out a field of Heidegger force of cable Heidegger has been involved in some but not very clear view to make a more in-depth analysis, say he might say, but no words. This requires that we must hand on Heidegger's thoughts have a grasp on the whole hand to creative interpretation of our problem is. Allow us to concentrate to Heidegger about art, beauty, poetry and other words, we are not allowed to meet in the thought of art review, also does not allow us to put Heidegger into the history of Western aesthetics, So we have to take multiple lines, to form the Polyphony of our study. On the one hand, we need to explain and analyze Heidegger about art, aesthetics, poetry thoughts, these thoughts and his whole thought combined with, he thought to pay attention to the basic starting point of these problems, rather than stay on the surface meaning on the other hand; we must keep the aesthetic tradition of these thoughts and Europe combined, we must clarify these ideas or put forward what actually solve the aesthetic problems, has what kind of significance for the development of aesthetics. Therefore, our research is along the overview, analysis, query, reduction, comparison "this
WP=6
A road is a positive understanding of every proposition that Heidegger has about beauty and art, and in a positive manner, it introduces the most creative way of thinking into aesthetics.
Because of the thought of Heidegger, our study was expanded accordingly opened, discussed with Heidegger, our research involves the aesthetic nature of the thought method of aesthetics, the research about beauty, aesthetics, aesthetics, art, aesthetics and so on the basic problems of poetry. In addition we also study the thought of art in general Heidegger thought the position and significance of research, the significance of Heidegger's Thought on China aesthetics, this is a study of the open thoughts of Heidegger has done for aesthetic significance in a more in-depth and more grand vision.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2003
【分類號(hào)】：B83-06

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 王洪才;;現(xiàn)象學(xué)教育學(xué):顛覆、回復(fù)與整合[J];比較教育研究;2007年08期

本文編號(hào)：1548267