本文關(guān)鍵詞：美學(xué)視域下的先秦英雄神話研究　出處：《廣西師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 先秦英雄神話 審美 思維 意識

【摘要】：神話產(chǎn)生初期先民的生產(chǎn)力水平以及智力水平都比較低,是人類借助想象征服和支配自然界,把自然的力量加以形象化的一種文學(xué)形式。神話就是人類通過幻想,在一種集體無意識的思維操縱下而形成的反映現(xiàn)實生活的口頭文學(xué),英雄神話屬于神話的一個分類,是數(shù)量較多的一類神話。這類神話產(chǎn)生比創(chuàng)世神話和神yG神話稍晚,表達(dá)了人類反抗自然的愿望,同時,也可說是人類某種勞動經(jīng)驗的概括總結(jié)。因此,先秦時代的英雄神話也就不可避免的被打上自然的形態(tài)和屬性,滲透出自然崇拜的跡象。審美視域下的先秦英雄神話的研究主要是通過與先秦英雄神話相關(guān)的先秦文獻(xiàn)史料、詩文經(jīng)傳、繪畫雕塑等考古文物這些物化產(chǎn)品來進(jìn)行發(fā)掘研究,同時這些資料也是筆者總結(jié)先秦英雄神話中審美內(nèi)涵與文化內(nèi)涵、研究先秦審美意識的重要資料。論文分為三部分:第一部分考察先秦英雄神話展現(xiàn)的原始思維、宗教文化背景。神話思維即早期人類思維,先秦英雄神話思維具有同一性、因果性、象征性、類比性、感性邏輯等特征。神話思維不同于宗教觀,神話始于原始宗教,原始先民宗教觀念的形成,是原始社會低級階段勞動和生產(chǎn)實踐發(fā)展到一定水平的產(chǎn)物,具有一定的自然性。第二部分通過分析各種文史典籍來探討先秦英雄神話的審美流變。先秦時代從原始社會貫穿到文明社會,神話從盤古開天辟地(創(chuàng)世神話)到秦始皇橫征暴斂(斗爭神話),零星片段地記錄在先秦和漢以后的古書里,并不成系統(tǒng)。通過分析《山海經(jīng)》、《楚辭》、《淮南記》等文獻(xiàn)資料,探討先秦英雄神話體現(xiàn)的審美文化內(nèi)涵、神話中英雄形象與自然關(guān)系藝術(shù)化的表達(dá)、先秦英雄神話所蘊(yùn)含的審美特征等內(nèi)容,可見原始先民的審美意識。第三部分主要研究先秦英雄神話的審美價值。神話流傳千年,后世不斷從神話中汲取民族精神和美學(xué)思想。其后引發(fā)的血統(tǒng)、家庭、社會、倫理觀念更深深地融入了中華民族的文化,不但影響著傳統(tǒng)政治觀念和宗法制度,也影響著后世倫理美學(xué)思想的發(fā)展。從最初的儒道兩家到當(dāng)代的英雄神話,先秦英雄神話的美學(xué)價值不可估量。先秦英雄神話中的英雄形象,反映了原始社會中先民最初的思維類型和宗教意識。在艱苦卓絕的環(huán)境中,英雄就是美與希望的最佳詮釋。研究先秦英雄神話,對中國古代審美文化史研究特別是中國古代人民審美觀研究都會有所裨益。
[Abstract]:The level of productivity and intelligence of the forefathers in the early stage of mythology was relatively low, and it was human beings who conquered and dominated the nature with the help of imagination. A literary form in which the forces of nature are visualized. Myth is a kind of oral literature formed by human beings under the control of a collective unconscious thinking. Heroic mythology belongs to a classification of mythology, is a large number of mythology. This kind of myth is later than the creation myth and the mythology of God YG, expressed the desire of mankind to resist nature, at the same time. It can also be said to be a summary of human labor experience. Therefore, the hero myth of the pre-Qin period will inevitably be hit on the natural form and attributes. Permeate the signs of natural worship. The study of pre-Qin hero mythology under the aesthetic perspective is mainly through the historical materials of the pre-Qin literature related to the pre-Qin hero mythology, poetry and prose biography. Painting, sculpture and other archaeological relics such as these materialized products to explore and study, at the same time, these materials are the author summed up the pre-Qin hero mythology aesthetic connotation and cultural connotation. The paper is divided into three parts: the first part is to investigate the primitive thinking and religious cultural background of the mythology of the heroes in the pre-Qin period. The mythical thinking is the early human thinking. The mythical thinking of heroes in the pre-Qin period has the characteristics of identity, causality, symbolism, analogy and perceptual logic. The mythical thinking is different from the religious view, and the mythology begins with the primitive religion and the formation of the religious concept of the primitive people. It is the result of the development of labor and production practice in the lower stage of primitive society to a certain level. The second part through the analysis of various literary and historical books to explore the pre-Qin hero mythology aesthetic evolution. Pre-Qin period from the primitive society through the civilized society. Myth from Pangu groundbreaking (creation mythology) to Qin Shihuang horizontal levy (struggle myth, scattered fragments recorded in the ancient books after the Qin and Han dynasties, not systematic. Through the analysis of "Shanhai Jing", "Chu ci"). This paper discusses the aesthetic cultural connotation embodied in the mythology of the pre-Qin heroes, the artistic expression of the relationship between the hero image and the nature in the mythology, and the aesthetic characteristics contained in the mythology of the heroes of the pre-Qin period. It can be seen that the aesthetic consciousness of the primitive ancestors. The third part mainly studies the aesthetic value of the hero mythology of the Pre-Qin Dynasty. Myth spread for thousands of years, and later generations continue to absorb the national spirit and aesthetic thought from the myth. The social and ethical concepts deeply integrated into the culture of the Chinese nation, not only affected the traditional political concept and patriarchal system. From the initial Confucian and Taoist schools to the contemporary hero myth, the aesthetic value of the pre-Qin hero myth is inestimable. The hero image in the pre-Qin hero myth. It reflects the original thinking type and religious consciousness of the ancestors in the primitive society. In the arduous environment, the hero is the best interpretation of beauty and hope. It will benefit the study of Chinese ancient aesthetic culture history, especially the ancient Chinese people's aesthetics.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B83-092

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 高一農(nóng);神話思維的基本特征[J];晉陽學(xué)刊;2000年06期

2 王合義;;復(fù)活的密碼——神話思維探索[J];西安建筑科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年04期

3 劉建輝;;走出困境的另一種思維——神話思維與野性思維的發(fā)現(xiàn)意味著什么?[J];福建論壇(人文社會科學(xué)版);2009年02期

4 于玉蓉;;神話思維與“神話中國”[J];北方民族大學(xué)學(xué)報;2013年05期

5 王四代;論神話思維的二重性及其他[J];云南民族學(xué)院學(xué)報;1988年04期

6 羅義群;;宗教—神話思維對《焚巾曲》的滲透與同化建構(gòu)[J];貴州文史叢刊;1988年04期

7 李培林;;神話思維和科學(xué)思維[J];法國研究;1988年01期

8 陳立浩;少數(shù)民族神話思維特征試論[J];貴州民族研究;1989年01期

9 楊文虎;神話思維的發(fā)生[J];文藝爭鳴;1990年06期

10 鄧啟耀;神話思維結(jié)構(gòu)的分化與序化[J];云南社會科學(xué);1991年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 于丹丹;“原始—神話思維”初探[D];東北師范大學(xué);2003年

2 額爾青圖;關(guān)于蒙古族神話思維研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué);2015年

3 王小兵;《山海經(jīng)》神話思維在文創(chuàng)產(chǎn)品設(shè)計中的轉(zhuǎn)化應(yīng)用研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2017年

4 段敬譯;玉器：神話、藝術(shù)之嬗變[D];西安音樂學(xué)院;2017年

5 林鏡;美學(xué)視域下的先秦英雄神話研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2017年

6 寧旭東;神話思維在早期中西文化中的留存及差異性研究[D];中南民族大學(xué);2007年

7 向世飛;從圖文關(guān)系看“公”原型與神話思維[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2010年

8 高雙;災(zāi)難電影的神話思維研究[D];青海師范大學(xué);2011年

9 鮑穎;從神話思維到發(fā)散式思維的方法論革命[D];南京師范大學(xué);2008年

10 吳曉東;神話思維范式與科學(xué)思維范式研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1390060