從語碼分析視角對《巴黎圣母院》進行符號學解讀
發(fā)布時間:2018-04-25 17:53
本文選題:文本分析 + 語碼方法。 參考:《湘潭大學》2012年碩士論文
【摘要】:符號學,就是有關符號的科學。符號學在西方人文社會科學中占有重要的地位。隨著社會和人文事業(yè)的發(fā)展,符號學開始被人們廣泛應用到各個領域,近年來形成了一股將符號學中的具體工具運用到分析分本的熱潮。這對文本的具體分析帶來了更深層面的美學效用。這無疑是文本研究的一種視角創(chuàng)新。20世紀80年代后,符號學在中國也開始傳播發(fā)展,出現(xiàn)了一批批研究符號學的專家學者,但主要是以研究符號學史和符號學理論方面為主。對文本進行具體分析的應用并未在中國得到充分發(fā)展。本文試圖運用符號學中的“語碼分析理論”,來剖析法國作家雨果的著作《巴黎圣母院》中蘊含的更深更全面的意義,同時從中獲得文本分析的經驗并試圖在對具體文本進行分析時能夠找到一條新途徑。 由于運用語碼的方法出現(xiàn)在羅蘭巴特的《S/Z》中,我們認為這是一個對具體本文進行分析的可行性方法。雖然我們還沒對此方法的具體理論找到依據(jù),但是在巴特的理論中這五個語碼分別被命名為:闡釋語碼、內涵語碼、象征語碼或對比語碼,情節(jié)語碼和文化語碼。本文就是運用了此五個語碼對文本進行剖析的。在具體的分析過程中將從三個不同的視角來劃分五種語碼所產生的效用,第一個視角是以修辭的角度來分析闡釋語碼和內涵語碼在作品中所起的修辭效用,這兩種語碼在作品中的作用比較大,它們能夠引起讀者的興趣,激發(fā)讀者的想像,使讀者在好奇中繼續(xù)閱讀下去。第二個是以作品的結構視角來解讀象征語碼或對比語碼,作品中這兩種語碼的存在是顯而易見并且共同發(fā)揮作用,使得作品的結構獨特,思路清晰。第三個則是涉及到語言,宗教,文化等各個方面的文化視角,從這個視角解構出來的語碼將作品背景中所蘊含的社會文化顯露無遺。從這三個視角解構出的這些語碼充分地為我們提供了文本所涵蓋的社會文化意義和美學意義。 《巴黎圣母院》是維克多·雨果的著作之一,這部作品舉世聞名,它以離奇和對比的手法講述了一個發(fā)生在15世紀法國的故事。而這個故事里存在很多的符號,這些符號所構筑的系統(tǒng)和結構符合語碼理論所研究的重點。也就是說這個故事中存在許多的語碼值得我們去挖掘和詮釋。通過這個語碼分析方法,我們能夠了解到這部著作的深層美學含義。并且通過分析該文本對介紹語碼方法的作用和為什么這部著作能夠聞名于世起到了一定的作用。 總之,,符號無處不在,語碼則是符號所構筑的系統(tǒng),符號學更是涵蓋所有科學的科學,符號學中存在著許多的工具有待學術界的挖掘和使用,本文是將符號學中的一個具體的理論應用到實踐中,試圖通過該應用獲得一種針對文本分析的新的方法。但需要指出是,研究結果的可行性有待補充和完善。
[Abstract]:Semiotics is the science of symbols. Semiotics plays an important role in western humanities and social sciences. With the development of society and humanities, semiotics has been widely used in various fields. In recent years, there has been an upsurge in the application of semiotics tools to the analysis. This specific analysis of the text brings a deeper level of aesthetic utility. This is undoubtedly a visual angle innovation of text study. Since 1980s, semiotics has also begun to spread and developed in China, and a number of experts and scholars have appeared, but mainly in the study of the history of semiotics and the theory of semiotics. The application of specific analysis of the text has not been fully developed in China. This paper attempts to use the "Code Analysis Theory" in semiotics to analyze the deeper and more comprehensive significance of French writer Hugo's Notre Dame in Paris. At the same time, we can gain the experience of text analysis and try to find a new way to analyze the specific text. Since the code-using method appears in Roland Bart's "S / Z", we think it is a feasible method to analyze this paper. Although we have not found any basis for the concrete theory of this method, in Bart's theory these five codesare named as: interpretive code, connotative code, symbolic code or contrastive code, plot code and cultural code. This paper uses the five codes to analyze the text. In the process of concrete analysis, the utility of the five codes will be divided from three different perspectives. The first angle is to analyze the rhetorical effects of the code and the connotative code in the works from the perspective of rhetoric. These two codes play a more important role in the works. They can arouse the reader's interest, arouse the reader's imagination and make the reader continue to read in curiosity. The second is to interpret the symbolic code or contrastive code from the perspective of the structure of the work. The existence of these two codes is obvious and plays a joint role in the work, which makes the structure of the work unique and the idea clear. The third is the cultural perspective of language, religion, culture and so on. The code deconstructed from this perspective reveals the social culture contained in the background of the works. These codes from these three perspectives provide us with the sociocultural and aesthetic meanings covered by the text. Notre Dame de Paris is one of Victor Hugo's works, a world-famous work that tells a story that took place in 15 th century France in a curious and contrastive way. There are a lot of symbols in this story. The system and structure of these symbols accord with the focus of code theory. In other words, there are many codes worth digging and interpreting in this story. Through this code-analysis method, we can understand the deep aesthetic meaning of this work. By analyzing the effect of this text on the introduction of code-method and why this work is famous in the world. In a word, the symbol is everywhere, the code is the system constructed by the symbol, the semiotics also covers all the science of science, there are many tools in semiotics to be excavated and used by the academic circles. This paper applies a specific theory of semiotics to practice and tries to obtain a new method for text analysis through this application. However, it should be pointed out that the feasibility of the research results needs to be supplemented and improved.
【學位授予單位】:湘潭大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:H0
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 李秋虹;;《巴黎圣母院》的對比手法及其形象體系[J];安陽師范學院學報;2007年03期
2 胡壯麟;當代符號學研究的若干問題[J];福建外語;1999年01期
3 劉伯香;《巴黎圣母院》人物形象之再思考[J];桂林師范高等專科學校學報(綜合版);2004年03期
4 黃濤梅;《巴黎圣母院》人物新論[J];甘肅高師學報;2002年03期
5 柏英;從文化符號學角度看《鋼鐵是怎樣煉成的》之爭[J];解放軍外國語學院學報;2005年05期
6 張永忠;;從符號學角度分析簡·奧斯丁小說中的人物形象分類[J];中國民航飛行學院學報;2009年06期
7 劉麗納;;回歸后的升騰——池莉中篇小說《你是一條河》《生活秀》符號化解讀[J];遼寧教育行政學院學報;2010年09期
8 王銘玉,宋堯;中國符號學研究20年[J];外國語(上海外國語大學學報);2003年01期
9 朱婷婷;;時代脈動的符號——《虹》中三代人婚戀觀的社會符號學解讀[J];揚州大學學報(人文社會科學版);2009年06期
10 王鴛珍;;從羅蘭·巴特的符號學理論看劉文彩的“惡霸地主”神話[J];中山大學學報論叢;2006年10期
本文編號:1802361
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/1802361.html