本文選題：結論 + 及物性系統(tǒng)��； 參考：《山東師范大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來，作為碩士學位論文質量評估重要因素的論文摘要和結論部分逐漸成為學者們競相研究的課題。而結論部分又因其客觀性，科學性和概括性直接決定著碩士論文的質量。國內(nèi)外學者專家們已從多種語言學角度對碩士論文結論部分做過各種有價值的研究。在本文中，作者將系統(tǒng)功能語言學的理論引入到英語語言學專業(yè)碩士論文結論的分析評價中，并將主要研究點鎖定在及物性系統(tǒng)。及物性系統(tǒng)是研究語篇概念功能強有力的工具，，在此之前，它已經(jīng)被廣泛應用到了文學語篇，科技語篇，以及大眾語篇的分析當中。在及物性系統(tǒng)的理論框架下，作者將進行針對英語語言學專業(yè)碩士論文結論部分的中美對比研究。 論文所用語料選自著名國外學位論文檢索平臺PQDD及國內(nèi)學位論文檢索平臺CNKI。作者在PQDD中選取英語為母語者所撰寫的十五篇英語語言學專業(yè)研究生論文結論，另在CNKI中選取十五篇中國英語語言學專業(yè)研究生所撰寫的學位論文結論。為了保證研究的信度，所選語篇均來自中美較有聲望的大學，且論文發(fā)表日期限定在2009至2011年。作者對碩士論文結論部分及物性的研究從宏觀和微觀兩個方面展開。在宏觀方面著重對比及物性過程在中美語言學碩士論文結論部分的分布情況，所占比例，過程，參與者，環(huán)境成分的組織情況。這種分析是通過UAM Corpus Tool這種方便的統(tǒng)計工具來完成的。將文本輸入，分割，標注后，此軟件能自動統(tǒng)計出各種過程或其他成分的相互關系。正因如此，分析的信度大大提高。微觀角度的研究著眼于不同過程的特點與及物性隱喻，這對清楚呈現(xiàn)中美學者運用及物性系統(tǒng)表達概念功能的異同有重要作用。 文章試圖回答如下問題:碩士論文結論中存在哪些及物性過程?比例多少?中美碩士論文結論在及物性方面有什么相同點和不同點?及物性隱喻在結論中是如何體現(xiàn)的，中美有何差異？ 通過對所選中語篇及物性分析及數(shù)據(jù)統(tǒng)計，本文得出以下結論:中美結論在及物性方面存在共同點和不同點。在結論中主要出現(xiàn)了關系過程、物質過程、心理過程，其中物質過程所占的比例最高。但母語為英語者的論文結論中物質過程所占比例要小于中國研究者的論文，而在關系過程中，情況恰恰相反。諸如此類的差別可以歸結于中外研究者在論文結論部分的側重點有所不同：中國研究者往往更注重總結歸納自己的研究結果，而外國學者更多致力于描述研究的意義及其對未來研究的影響。通過對及物性系統(tǒng)其他要素，如參與者，環(huán)境要素的細致分析，作者逐步歸納出了中外研究生論文結論部分的及物性特點。及物性隱喻作為所有隱喻中最高級語言能力的體現(xiàn)在結論中占一定頻率，但相較于母語英語者，非母語英語者對及物性隱喻的運用較少且形式單一，內(nèi)容不靈活。 綜上所述，本研究豐富了系統(tǒng)功能語言學領域下及物性系統(tǒng)的理論，并對中國學生及學者進行論文結論寫作及英語寫作、閱讀教學有一定的借鑒作用。
[Abstract]:In recent years, abstracts and conclusions, which are important factors for the quality evaluation of master's degree papers, have gradually become the subject of research by scholars. The conclusion is directly determined by its objectivity, scientificity and generality. Scholars at home and abroad have made a variety of linguistic perspectives on the conclusion of the master's thesis. In this paper, the author introduces the theory of systemic functional linguistics to the analysis and evaluation of the conclusion of the master's thesis in the major of English linguistics, and loclocks the main research points in the transitivity system. The transitivity system is a powerful tool for the study of the conceptual function of the text. Before this, it has been widely used. Under the theoretical framework of transitivity system, the author will carry out a contrastive study on the conclusion of the master's thesis of the English linguistics major in the theoretical framework of the transitivity system.
The papers are selected from the famous foreign degree thesis retrieval platform PQDD and the CNKI. author of the domestic dissertation retrieval platform in the PQDD selection of fifteen English linguistics major postgraduate conclusions written by native speakers of English. In addition, fifteen Chinese English major postgraduates are selected in CNKI. In order to ensure the reliability of the research, the selected texts are all from the more prestigious universities in China and the United States, and the date of publication is limited to 2009 to 2011. The author's research on the transitivity of the conclusion of the thesis is from two aspects of macro and micro aspects. The distribution, the proportion, the process, the participants, the organization of the environmental components. This analysis is done by the convenient statistical tool of UAM Corpus Tool. After the text is entered, divided, and annotated, the software can automatically count the relationships of various processes or other components. The study of view angle is focused on the characteristics of different processes and transitive metaphors, which plays an important role in clearly presenting the similarities and differences between Chinese and American scholars in the use of transitivity system to express conceptual functions.
The article tries to answer the following questions: what transitivity process in the conclusion of the master's thesis? What are the similarities and differences in transitivity? How does transitive metaphor reflect in the conclusion, and what is the difference between China and the United States?
Through the analysis of the transitivity and data statistics of the selected discourse, this paper draws the following conclusions: the conclusion is common and different in transitivity. In the conclusion, the relationship process, the material process and the psychological process are the highest in the conclusion, but the material process is the highest in the conclusion. The proportion is less than the Chinese researchers' papers, but in the relationship process, the situation is the opposite. The differences can be attributed to the differences between Chinese and foreign researchers in the conclusion part of the paper: Chinese researchers tend to pay more attention to summarizing their research results, and foreign scholars are more devoted to describing the significance of the research. Through the careful analysis of other elements of transitivity system, such as participants and environmental factors, the author gradually concludes the transitivity of the conclusion part of the Chinese and foreign postgraduate thesis. Transitive metaphor, as the most advanced language in all metaphors, accounts for a certain frequency, but is compared to the mother tongue. English speakers and non native English speakers use less transitive metaphors and are not flexible in form.
To sum up, this study enriches the theory of transitivity system in the field of systemic functional linguistics, and has a certain reference to Chinese students and scholars in the conclusion of thesis writing and English writing.
【學位授予單位】：山東師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H319

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王宗炎;讀胡壯麟等人編著的《系統(tǒng)功能語法概論》[J];福建外語;1999年03期

2 于暉;語篇體裁結構潛勢及其應用[J];解放軍外國語學院學報;2001年01期

3 于暉;語篇體裁、語篇類型與外語教學[J];解放軍外國語學院學報;2003年05期

4 秦俊紅;;合成空間理論與廣告語篇中隱喻的前景化[J];晉中學院學報;2007年01期

5 何瑞清;中外科技期刊英文摘要比較——語態(tài)分布和“頭重腳輕”句的使用頻率[J];上海科技翻譯;2004年01期

6 鞠玉梅;體裁分析與英漢學術論文摘要語篇[J];外語教學;2004年02期

7 李松濤;中西思維模式差異對大學生英語寫作中語篇組織的影響[J];外語教學;2005年02期

8 范文芳;;試論語法隱喻的綜合模式[J];外語教學;2007年04期

9 楊永林;楊慧;胡來紅;;魅力求職信函寫作——來自清華大學“論文發(fā)表與學術寫作”課堂的研究報告[J];外語教學;2007年05期

10 秦秀白!510640;體裁教學法述評[J];外語教學與研究;2000年01期

本文編號：2012349