翟理斯(Herbert Giles,1845-1935)是十九世紀(jì)下半葉至二十世紀(jì)初英國(guó)漢詩(shī)翻譯領(lǐng)域最具有代表性的漢學(xué)家之一。翟理斯一生筆耕不輟,著作頗豐,他的漢詩(shī)英譯以語(yǔ)言華麗,格律嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)著稱(chēng)于世。韋利(Arthur Waley,1889-1966)是繼翟理斯之后英國(guó)漢學(xué)界的又一后起之秀。韋利以顛覆者的形象登上漢詩(shī)翻譯的舞臺(tái)。他不僅舍棄了嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)?shù)母衤审w和華麗抽象的語(yǔ)言風(fēng)格,還以霍普金斯的“彈跳節(jié)奏”為核心建立起屬于自己的譯詩(shī)風(fēng)格。翟理斯和韋利是兩個(gè)相鄰時(shí)期英國(guó)漢學(xué)界漢詩(shī)翻譯領(lǐng)域的杰出代表,但二者的漢詩(shī)翻譯在多個(gè)層面表現(xiàn)出明顯的差異。作為一名后輩譯者,韋利不僅在翻譯實(shí)踐中背離了以翟理斯為代表的翻譯傳統(tǒng),還曾在1918年至1920年間與翟理斯就漢詩(shī)翻譯展開(kāi)一場(chǎng)專(zhuān)門(mén)的論戰(zhàn)。布魯姆(Harold Bloom,1930-)是美國(guó)“耶魯學(xué)派”的重要批評(píng)家、文學(xué)理論家。他在《影響的焦慮》中提出誤讀理論。布魯姆的誤讀理論重新定義了前輩詩(shī)人與后輩詩(shī)人之間的關(guān)系。布魯姆用誤讀來(lái)描述后輩詩(shī)人為了建立自己的文學(xué)地位而對(duì)前輩詩(shī)人所代表的文學(xué)傳統(tǒng)進(jìn)行偏移和修正的傾向。誤讀理論雖為詩(shī)歌理論,但同樣能為翻譯領(lǐng)域的研究帶...

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：65 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ABSTRACT
摘要
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
    1.1 Rationale
    1.2 Significance
    1.3 Research objective and Research Questions
    1.4 Methodology and Data Collection
    1.5 Organization of the Thesis
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW
    2.1 Studies on the Poetry Translation of Herbert Giles and Arthur Waley
        2.1.1 Studies on the Poetry Translation of Herbert Giles
        2.1.2 Studies on the Poetry Translation of Arthur Waley
        2.1.3 Studies on the Different Schools of Poetry Translation
    2.2 Studies on the Debate on Poetry Translation between Herbert Giles and Arthur Waley
    2.3 Studies on the Biographical Facts about Herbert Giles and Arthur Waley
CHAPTER THREE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
    3.1 A Brief Introduction to Harold Bloom and the Misreading Theory
    3.2 Inter-translator Relationship between Precedent Translators and Posterior Translators
    3.3 Working Definition
        3.3.1 Precedent Translators
        3.3.2 Strong Posterior Translators
        3.3.3 Misreading
    3.4 Analytical Framework
CHAPTER FOUR APPLICATION OF THE MISREADING THEORY TO THE STUDY ON THE INTER-TRANSLATOR RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HERBERT GILES AND ARTHUR WALEY
    4.1 Arthur Waley's Motivation for Misreading Herbert Giles
        4.1.1 An Introduction to the Achievements of Poetry Translation of Herbert Giles and Arthur Waley
        4.1.2 The Debate on Poetry Translation between Herbert Giles and Arthur Waley
    4.2 Arthur Waley's Swerve from the Translation Tradition Represented by Herbert Giles
        4.2.1 Herbert Giles'Principle of Material Selection
        4.2.2 Arthur Waley's Principle of Material Selection
        4.2.3 Classification of the Different Schools of Poetry Translation
        4.2.4 Herbert Giles'Principle of Poetry Translation
        4.2.5 Arthur Waley's Principle of Poetry Translation
    4.3 Arthur Waley's Revision of the Translation Tradition Represented by Herbert Giles
        4.3.1 Diction
        4.3.2 Form
    4.4 The Establishment of Arthur Waley's Position in Poetry Translation
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION
    5.1 Major Findings and Implications
    5.2 Limitations
    5.3 Suggestions for Future Research
REFERENCES



本文編號(hào)：3749547