建議是說(shuō)話人言及對(duì)聽(tīng)話人有利的指令性言語(yǔ),對(duì)維護(hù)和促進(jìn)交際雙方的社會(huì)關(guān)系有重要作用。前人對(duì)建議言語(yǔ)行為的研究多聚焦于日常話語(yǔ)中建議言語(yǔ)行為的分類(lèi)、策略及其語(yǔ)言特征等,而對(duì)機(jī)構(gòu)話語(yǔ)中建議言語(yǔ)行為的語(yǔ)言實(shí)現(xiàn)形式及其所蘊(yùn)含的動(dòng)因未做深入探討。本研究以中美外交部官方發(fā)言人在正式政治場(chǎng)合中的真實(shí)話語(yǔ)為語(yǔ)料,自建中美政治話語(yǔ)語(yǔ)料庫(kù),分別對(duì)中美政治建議言語(yǔ)行為的言外之力指示手段及策略進(jìn)行定量分析。在此基礎(chǔ)上,本研究分別從禮貌的語(yǔ)言語(yǔ)用與社會(huì)語(yǔ)用(Leech,2014)兩個(gè)維度對(duì)中美政治建議言語(yǔ)行為的異同進(jìn)行質(zhì)性分析,旨在進(jìn)一步揭示其深層次語(yǔ)用理?yè)?jù)。研究發(fā)現(xiàn):1)在言外之力指示手段方面,中國(guó)政治建議主要通過(guò)“間接建議”實(shí)現(xiàn),如“暗示”、“無(wú)人稱”及“間接施為動(dòng)詞”等;而美國(guó)政治建議主要采取“規(guī)約建議”,如“特定程式”、“可能性”及“條件句”等。2)在策略方面,中美政治建議都強(qiáng)調(diào)“聽(tīng)話人主導(dǎo)”且伴有“補(bǔ)救策略”;而在“隱性主導(dǎo)”、“規(guī)約間接”及“無(wú)補(bǔ)救策略”等層面,中美兩國(guó)政治建議均存在顯著性差異。3)本研究進(jìn)一步從敬語(yǔ)形式、情態(tài)動(dòng)詞、自稱轉(zhuǎn)換等禮貌的語(yǔ)言語(yǔ)用維度與垂直距離、水平距離以及交際的權(quán)衡等社會(huì)... 

【文章來(lái)源】：大連外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)遼寧省

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：89 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
ABSTRACT
摘要
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
    1.1 Background of the research
    1.2 Significance of the research
    1.3 Objective of the research
    1.4 Structure of the thesis
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW
    2.1 Previous research on the speech act of advising
        2.1.1 Identifications of the speech act of advising
        2.1.2 Research concerns of the speech act of advising
        2.1.3 Research approaches to the speech act of advising
    2.2 Previous research on political speech act of advising
        2.2.1 Identification of political speech act of advising
        2.2.2 Properties of political speech act of advising
    2.3 Theoretical approaches to the research
        2.3.1 Pragmalinguistic facet of politeness
        2.3.2 Sociopragmatic facet of politeness
CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
    3.1 Research questions
    3.2 Research method
    3.3 Corpus used
    3.4 Procedures for data collection and analysis
CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    4.1 IFIDs in Chinese and American political speech act of advising
        4.1.1 IFIDs in Chinese political speech act of advising
        4.1.2 IFIDs in American political speech act of advising
    4.2 Strategies in Chinese and American political speech act of advising
        4.2.1 Similarities in Chinese and American political speech act of advising
        4.2.2 Differences in Chinese and American political speech act of advising
    4.3 Underlying causes behind the contrastive results
        4.3.1 In the pragmalinguistic politeness facet
            4.3.1.1 Honorific forms
            4.3.1.2 Modal verbs
            4.3.1.3 Varied “self”
        4.3.2 In the sociopragmatic politeness facet
            4.3.2.1 Vertical distance
            4.3.2.2 Horizontal distance
            4.3.2.3 Weightness of the transaction
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION
    5.1 Major Findings
    5.2 Theoretical and practical implications
    5.3 Limitations and suggestions for further research
REFERENCES


【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]建議類(lèi)言外構(gòu)式的轉(zhuǎn)喻操作[J]. 李秀娟,董艷.  中北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版). 2018(01)
[2]中美政治道歉言語(yǔ)行為對(duì)比研究[J]. 劉風(fēng)光,鄧耀臣,肇迎如.  外語(yǔ)與外語(yǔ)教學(xué). 2016(06)
[3]網(wǎng)絡(luò)語(yǔ)境下建議行為的語(yǔ)用機(jī)制研究[J]. 毛延生,黃倩倩.  語(yǔ)言教學(xué)與研究. 2016(03)
[4]霸權(quán)國(guó)與其他主要大國(guó)關(guān)系研究——以二戰(zhàn)后歷史為例[J]. 肖河.  世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治. 2016(03)
[5]國(guó)外英語(yǔ)學(xué)術(shù)期刊論文中建議話語(yǔ)的身份建構(gòu)——一項(xiàng)實(shí)證研究[J]. 何荷.  外語(yǔ)教學(xué)理論與實(shí)踐. 2016(01)
[6]學(xué)術(shù)互動(dòng)中權(quán)勢(shì)關(guān)系建構(gòu)的語(yǔ)用分析[J]. 任育新.  現(xiàn)代外語(yǔ). 2015(02)
[7]政治話語(yǔ)研究——俄語(yǔ)語(yǔ)言研究的新方向[J]. 蔣春麗,楊可.  廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào). 2013(06)
[8]漢語(yǔ)學(xué)術(shù)互動(dòng)中的建議話語(yǔ)序列特征研究[J]. 任育新.  暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版). 2013(03)
[9]產(chǎn)前檢查中建議序列的會(huì)話分析研究[J]. 于國(guó)棟.  外國(guó)語(yǔ)(上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)). 2009(01)
[10]使命感與美國(guó)外交理念——一種宗教視角的分析[J]. 楊衛(wèi)東.  東北師大學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版). 2007(02)



本文編號(hào)：2938699