本文選題：表現(xiàn)性評價 + 大學英語口語學習�。� 參考：《吉林大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：大學生口語教學在英語教學中的作用日益顯著,對培養(yǎng)學生的實際運用語言能力,以及交際能力具有重要作用�？谡Z課堂中,傳統(tǒng)的評價方式無法滿足對學生口語能力的培養(yǎng)。因此在大學英語口語課堂中表現(xiàn)性評價的應用越發(fā)重要。表現(xiàn)性評價包括自我評價,同伴評價以及教師評價。與傳統(tǒng)的評價方式不同,表現(xiàn)性評價強調(diào)給學生創(chuàng)建真實的情景,以便觀察學生使用語言的能力,以及對他們所掌握的知識,情感態(tài)度方面的培養(yǎng)。近幾年來,國內(nèi)外對表現(xiàn)性評價的研究日益增多,但對表現(xiàn)性評價在外語課堂上,尤其是口語課堂上的研究仍相對較少。本研究試圖探究表現(xiàn)性評價對大學生口語學習的影響,并分析影響大學生口語表達的因素。本研究采用質(zhì)性研究和量化研究相結(jié)合的研究方法,采用的工具包括兩論測試,課堂觀察以及兩份調(diào)查問卷。獲得的數(shù)據(jù)互相輔助,相互驗證,以提高研究的可信度。本研究選取某校非英語專業(yè)的47名學生為研究對象,在大學英語口語課堂上開展為期十二周的口語教學的實證研究,口語教學分單雙周進行,實際教學時長為12課時。在第一次和最后一次課程中,分別對學生進行前測和后測,并回答兩份調(diào)查問卷。本研究通過對前測與后測、兩份調(diào)查問卷的結(jié)果進行統(tǒng)計分析和比較,以及課堂觀察,得出結(jié)論。研究結(jié)果表明,表現(xiàn)性評價(1)提高了學生說英語時的自信,(2)激發(fā)了學生學習英語的主動性,(3)促進了學生對英語的興趣,(4)使學生意識到自我評價,同伴評價以及教師評價的重要性。由此可見,表現(xiàn)性評價的對大學生口語學習有促進作用。但本研究扔具有下述局限性,(1)由于實驗的時間有限,難以考證學生在長期英語學習中情感態(tài)度的變化,(2)由于研究對象有限,表現(xiàn)性評價對大學口語學習的影響仍需在更大范圍研究中得到進一步驗證,(3)由于課堂上,學生無法一直保持專注,因此,有必要進一步研究如何提高學生的專注度。
[Abstract]:Oral English teaching plays an increasingly important role in English teaching, which plays an important role in cultivating students' practical language competence and communicative competence. In oral class, the traditional evaluation method can not satisfy the cultivation of students' oral ability. Therefore, the application of performance evaluation in oral English classroom is more and more important. Performance evaluation includes self-evaluation, peer evaluation and teacher evaluation. Different from the traditional evaluation methods, expressiveness evaluation emphasizes the creation of real situations for students to observe their ability to use language, as well as the cultivation of their knowledge and emotional attitude. In recent years, the research on expressiveness evaluation has been increasing day by day at home and abroad, but the research on expressiveness evaluation in foreign language classroom, especially in spoken language classroom, is still relatively few. This study attempts to explore the impact of performance evaluation on college students' oral English learning, and to analyze the factors affecting college students' oral expression. In this study, qualitative and quantitative research methods were used, including two-theory test, classroom observation and two questionnaires. The obtained data complement and verify each other to improve the reliability of the study. In this study, 47 students of non-English major in a certain school were selected as the research objects, and an empirical study was conducted on oral English teaching for 12 weeks in a college spoken English classroom. Oral English teaching was conducted in one and two weeks, and the actual teaching time was 12 class hours. In the first and last courses, the students were tested before and after the test, and two questionnaires were answered. Through the statistical analysis and comparison of the results of the two questionnaires, as well as classroom observation, this study draws a conclusion. The results of the study show that performance evaluation (1) improves students' confidence in speaking English and stimulates students' initiative in learning English. It promotes students' interest in English and makes students aware of self-evaluation. The importance of peer evaluation and teacher evaluation. It can be seen that the performance of evaluation of college students oral learning has a role in promoting. However, this study has the following limitations: (1) due to the limited time of the experiment, it is difficult to verify the change of students' emotional attitude in long-term English learning. The impact of performance evaluation on oral English learning still needs to be further verified in a wider field of research. (3) since students are unable to keep their focus in class, it is necessary to further study how to improve students' concentration.
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H319.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙德成;;表現(xiàn)性評價:歷史、實踐及未來[J];課程·教材·教法;2013年02期

2 周文葉;;超越紙筆測試:表現(xiàn)性評價的應用[J];當代教育科學;2011年20期

3 文開艷;;探析新課程理念下對學生的表現(xiàn)性評價[J];當代教育論壇;2006年06期

4 霍力巖,李敏誼;多元智力理論與多元文化教育[J];比較教育研究;2005年11期

5 王斌興;論新課程實施中學生表現(xiàn)性評價[J];教育探索;2005年07期

6 霍力巖,趙清梅;多元智力理論的評價觀及其對學生發(fā)展評價的啟示[J];比較教育研究;2005年04期

7 王沛,康廷虎;建構(gòu)主義學習理論述評[J];教師教育研究;2004年05期

8 王小明;;表現(xiàn)性評價:一種高級學習的評價方法[J];全球教育展望;2003年11期

9 余勝泉,楊曉娟,何克抗;基于建構(gòu)主義的教學設計模式[J];電化教育研究;2000年12期

10 何克抗;建構(gòu)主義的教學模式、教學方法與教學設計[J];北京師范大學學報(社會科學版);1997年05期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 周文葉;學生表現(xiàn)性評價研究[D];華東師范大學;2009年

，

本文編號：1893814