本文是關(guān)于“悖論”的研究。與傳統(tǒng)觀點(diǎn)不同,本文旨在迎合新時(shí)代的精神,重新認(rèn)識(shí)悖論的存在和發(fā)揮作用的方式。以下是一個(gè)悖論的例子:當(dāng)一位律師想知道“合法性和非法性”這一區(qū)別本身是否合法時(shí),盡管他手頭上缺乏完整充分信息,他卻仍然在這種情況下被迫作出自己的判斷。在調(diào)整跨界水的國際法規(guī)范中最突出的悖論就是由分化的主權(quán)觀念中所產(chǎn)生的矛盾性期望。這也是為什么我們不難理解,為何國際法學(xué)者在學(xué)術(shù)上經(jīng)常處于不安的狀況中。尤其是考慮到公平合理利用原則,作為國際法學(xué)界面對跨界水領(lǐng)域問題所能提供的最為實(shí)體性的回應(yīng),卻未能給解決問題提供任何答案——因?yàn)樵撛瓌t嘗試將所有情況涵括在內(nèi),結(jié)果卻是什么情況都無法涵括在內(nèi)。甚至在某種程度上似乎是這一原則讓國際法這一學(xué)科產(chǎn)生出“碎片,隔離”（humpty-dumpties）。因?yàn)槲覀內(nèi)諠u發(fā)現(xiàn),法律論證策略逐漸發(fā)生以下轉(zhuǎn)變:從確定性向不確定性、從過去到未來,以及從發(fā)現(xiàn)認(rèn)定規(guī)則事實(shí)到計(jì)算各種概率和可能性。盡管法律的形式主義已經(jīng)發(fā)生了以上轉(zhuǎn)變,但是實(shí)踐中國際法學(xué)者很少采用更為合理的方法論來應(yīng)對上述的不確定性。相反,我們經(jīng)�？吹降氖且幌盗行涡紊淖韵嗝芎屯x反復(fù)的法律論證套路,這... 

【文章來源】：廈門大學(xué)福建省 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直屬院校

【文章頁數(shù)】：180 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：博士

【文章目錄】：
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
內(nèi)容摘要
ABSTRACT
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION AND THESIS OUTLINE
    1.1 Mapping out the Structural Problems of Transboundary Waters
    1.2 Mapping out the Structural Problems of Law’s Management of Contingency
CHAPTER Ⅱ FIRST-ORDER OBSERVATION:    THE DILEMMA OF KOSKENNIMI5S UTOPIANISM AND APOLOGISM
    2.1 Introduction of the Key Differences between First and Second-Order observation
    2.2 The Utopumist
    2.3 The Utopian dilemma
    2.4 The Apologist
    2.5 The Apologist dilemma
CHAPTER Ⅲ SECOND-ORDER OBSERVATION:    A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK TO WORK OUT THE REOCCURRING PATTERNS UNDER WHICH INTERNATIONAL LAW MAKES PARADOXES INVISIBLE
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 Methodological Background
    3.3 Overview of Theoretical Framework
    3.4 Theoretical Framework part One: Closure
    3.5 Conclusion
CHAPTER Ⅳ SECOND-ORDER OBSERVATION:    A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK TO WORK OUT THE REOCCURRING PATTERNS UNDER WHICH INTERNATIONAL LAW MIGHT PRODUCTIVELY MAKE USE OF PARADOXES
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 Methodological Background
    4.3 Overview of Theoretical Framework
    4.4 Theoretical Framework part Two:Openness
    4.5 Conclusion
CHAPTER V THlRD-ORDER OBSERVATION: A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK TO WORK OUT HOW TO STUDY THE FUTURE OF INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
    5.1 Introduction
    5.2 Methodological Background
    5.3 Overview of Theoretical Framework
    5.4 Theoretical Framework part Three: Operative Closure
    5.5 Conclusion
CHAPTER Ⅵ REFLECTIONS
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDIX



本文編號：3608074