發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-29 22:24

  本文選題：終身教育法 + 立法困境��； 參考：《華東師范大學(xué)》2017年博士論文

【摘要】：終身教育的理念自提出以來(lái),由于其對(duì)國(guó)家可持續(xù)發(fā)展的推動(dòng)力和對(duì)公民強(qiáng)大的塑造作用而廣受重視。目前,國(guó)際社會(huì)已有許多國(guó)家將終身教育作為一項(xiàng)重要理念來(lái)變革本國(guó)現(xiàn)有的教育制度,其推進(jìn)方式和舉措亦成為一個(gè)備受矚目且值得研究的領(lǐng)域。不言而喻,法律由于其規(guī)范性、強(qiáng)制性和權(quán)威性的特點(diǎn),是國(guó)家機(jī)器中最有利的制度推行工具。近年來(lái),國(guó)際社會(huì)終身教育法制化的進(jìn)程亦在逐步加快,美國(guó)、法國(guó)、日本、韓國(guó)等相繼在終身教育領(lǐng)域進(jìn)行立法并取得了積極的成效。終身教育的思潮自二十世紀(jì)八十年代傳入我國(guó)以來(lái),很快得到推廣和普及。追隨國(guó)際社會(huì)終身教育的發(fā)展趨勢(shì),我國(guó)終身教育的立法構(gòu)想和規(guī)劃也一再被提上議事日程。經(jīng)過(guò)數(shù)十年的努力,我國(guó)國(guó)家層面的終身教育立法仍停留在"研究"和"構(gòu)想"階段,立法工作進(jìn)展緩慢、舉步維艱。我國(guó)終身教育立法為何陷入困境?是什么原因造成了如今的困頓局面?《中華人民共和國(guó)教育法》在2015年修訂之后增加了多項(xiàng)條款對(duì)終身教育的規(guī)定予以充實(shí),可見(jiàn),終身教育立法的推進(jìn)工作從未停止。國(guó)家層面立法之所以遲遲難以出臺(tái),既有立法實(shí)踐方面存在的諸多內(nèi)部問(wèn)題,也有終身教育理論研究不足,以及終身教育體系構(gòu)建空泛無(wú)序、實(shí)踐推動(dòng)浮于表面等外部因素。這些問(wèn)題導(dǎo)致了立法規(guī)范難以準(zhǔn)確定位,調(diào)整對(duì)象無(wú)法嚴(yán)密界定的尷尬局面,而立法的滯后無(wú)疑又阻礙了終身教育事業(yè)的健康發(fā)展。立法已然陷入困境,我們應(yīng)該如何積極作為?國(guó)際上已有成功立法經(jīng)驗(yàn),文章對(duì)已有成熟終身教育立法體系的國(guó)家的終身教育立法演進(jìn)及目前的法律文本做出分析,通過(guò)探討他們立法中的利弊得失來(lái)吸取有益經(jīng)驗(yàn)并避免可能出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題。需要指出的是,借鑒發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家終身教育發(fā)展及立法成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)不能僅僅進(jìn)行"法律移植",充分的"本土化"才能構(gòu)建一部適合本國(guó)終身教育發(fā)展的"良法"。我國(guó)當(dāng)下出臺(tái)《終身教育法》是否確有必要?立法的時(shí)機(jī)是否成熟?文章將結(jié)合我國(guó)國(guó)情做出終身教育的"立法可行性"分析。為了改變我國(guó)長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)世俗、功利的教育觀念,回歸教育的生命本質(zhì),同時(shí)通過(guò)自上而下的推動(dòng)實(shí)現(xiàn)終身教育體系的建設(shè),彌補(bǔ)現(xiàn)有終身教育法律體系的斷層,《終身教育法》的制定不僅必要而且迫切。此外,基于我國(guó)公民終身學(xué)習(xí)需求的增長(zhǎng),加之科學(xué)技術(shù)的支撐和經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)的保障,以及現(xiàn)有的政策法律基礎(chǔ),《終身教育法》的制定在我國(guó)已經(jīng)達(dá)到條件相對(duì)成熟的階段。文章的第二部分,也即本文的四、五、六、七章,為破解長(zhǎng)久以來(lái)困擾我國(guó)終身教育立法的難題,擬對(duì)國(guó)家《終身教育法》的立法要素、立法賴以推行的制度基礎(chǔ),以及國(guó)家終身教育立法的核心理念——"學(xué)習(xí)權(quán)"保障等關(guān)鍵問(wèn)題進(jìn)行深入探究與論述。目的在于從理論層面和操作角度為我國(guó)的終身教育立法提供可資參考的建議�！督K身教育法》的產(chǎn)生使教育法律體系中又多了一部單行法,它在現(xiàn)有的法律體系中處于何種地位?該如何處理與現(xiàn)有法律體系的沖突?文章的第三部分,即第八章,意在明晰《終身教育法》與其他教育法律的邊界與聯(lián)系。這一探討將為現(xiàn)有教育法律體系和未來(lái)終身教育法律體系的協(xié)調(diào)與統(tǒng)一奠定基礎(chǔ),同時(shí)也為日后《終身教育法》的順利推行理清思路。
[Abstract]:Since the concept of lifelong education has been put forward, it has been paid much attention to the impetus for the sustainable development of the country and the powerful shaping role of the citizens. At present, the international community has taken the lifelong education as an important concept to change the existing educational system in its own country, and its ways and measures have become a focus of attention. It is self-evident that the law, due to its normative, mandatory and authoritative characteristics, is the most favorable tool for the implementation of the system in the state machine. In recent years, the process of the legal system of lifelong education in the international community has also been gradually accelerated. The United States, France, Japan, and Korea have made legislation in the field of lifelong education and have achieved positive results. The trend of life-long education has been popularized and popularized in China since it was introduced into China in 1980s. Following the trend of lifelong education in the international community, the legislative conception and planning of life-long education in our country have been put on the agenda again and again. After decades of efforts, the legislation of life-long education at the national level still stays in China. In the stage of "research" and "conception", the legislative work has been slow and difficult. Why does our country's life-long education legislation have been in trouble? What is the cause of the dilemma? < People's Republic of China Education Law >, after the revision of the 2015, a number of provisions have been added to the provisions of final education. It has never ceased to work. The legislation of the national level is difficult to come out. There are many internal problems in the practice of legislation, the lack of research on the theory of lifelong education, the construction of the system of lifelong education, the construction of the system and the external factors which float on the surface. These problems lead to the difficulty of the accurate positioning of the legislative norms and the adjustment of the legislative norms. The awkward situation that the object can not be strictly defined, and the lag of the legislation has undoubtedly hindered the healthy development of the lifelong education. The legislation has already fallen into a dilemma. How should we actively act as a successful legislation in the world and the legislation evolution and the current law of a country with a mature life-long education legislation system By analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of their legislation, the text makes an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of their legislation and avoids the possible problems. It is necessary to point out that learning from the development of lifelong education and the successful experience of legislation in the developed countries can not only carry out "legal transplantation", and the "localization" can build a good "good" for the development of life-long education in the country. Is it necessary for the present law of life-long education in China? Is the timing of legislation mature? The article will make an analysis of the "legislative feasibility" of lifelong education in the light of our national conditions. In order to change our long secular, utilitarian education concept, return to the essence of the life of Education, and realize life-long education from top to bottom. The construction of the system is not only necessary but urgent to make up the fault of the existing legal system of lifelong education, and the formulation of the law of lifelong education is not only necessary but also urgent. In addition, based on the growth of the demand for lifelong learning of the citizens of our country, and the support of science and technology and the guarantee of the economic basis, and the existing policy and legal basis, the formulation of the life-long education law has been reached in China The second part of the article, which is the four, five, six, and seven chapters of this article, is to solve the problems that have been puzzling our country's lifelong education legislation for a long time, the legislative elements of the country's life-long education law, the institutional basis for the implementation of the law, and the core concept of the national final education legislation, "the right to study" and so on. The key issues are explored and discussed in depth. The purpose is to provide a useful reference for our country's life-long education legislation from the theoretical and operational perspectives. The generation of the life-long education law makes the education legal system more a single line of law. What is its position in the existing legal system? How to deal with the existing legal system The third part of the article, the eighth chapter, is intended to clarify the boundary and connection between the life-long education law and other educational laws. This discussion will lay the foundation for the coordination and unification of the existing legal system of education and the legal system of the future life-long education, as well as to clarify the ideas for the smooth implementation of the later life-long education law.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.16

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 高新才;李笑含;;淺析新型城鎮(zhèn)化下失地農(nóng)民補(bǔ)償安置問(wèn)題[J];西北師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2016年03期

2 李兆允;;終身學(xué)習(xí)視野下的社區(qū)教育發(fā)展策略[J];成人教育;2016年03期

3 郝淑華;;教育法實(shí)效問(wèn)題探究[J];沈陽(yáng)師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年03期

4 范曉峰;;域內(nèi)終身教育立法的比較研究[J];河北廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2015年02期

5 馮鴻滔;;基于網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)文本的河北省終身教育政策分析[J];河北廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2015年02期

6 鄭新建;;終身教育法治化的探索與思考——以《河北省終身教育促進(jìn)條例》為例[J];河北廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2015年02期

7 王桂玲;;基于法理視角的我國(guó)終身教育立法之比較[J];廣東開(kāi)放大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2015年02期

8 苗連營(yíng);;立法法重心的位移:從權(quán)限劃分到立法監(jiān)督[J];學(xué)術(shù)交流;2015年04期

9 丁紅玲;;終身教育公益性及其有效實(shí)現(xiàn)[J];中國(guó)職業(yè)技術(shù)教育;2015年09期

10 田曉苗;;中國(guó)教育法治化:歷程、問(wèn)題與反思[J];國(guó)家教育行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 龔可瀾;維權(quán)教育視野下政府維護(hù)公民權(quán)利問(wèn)題研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2014年

2 國(guó)卉男;中國(guó)終身教育政策研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2013年

3 陳誠(chéng);論憲法的綱領(lǐng)性條款[D];浙江大學(xué);2011年

4 陳焱光;公民權(quán)利救濟(jì)論[D];武漢大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 董辰;法律文本中的法律救濟(jì)條款設(shè)置研究[D];山東大學(xué);2014年

2 劉敏;大中型民營(yíng)企業(yè)從業(yè)人員繼續(xù)學(xué)習(xí)激勵(lì)機(jī)制研究[D];江西師范大學(xué);2012年

3 陳露;成人學(xué)習(xí)權(quán)研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2006年

4 李燕;論受教育權(quán)的行政救濟(jì)[D];山東大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1821845