【摘要】：2014年11月1日,新《行政訴訟法》頒行,其第53條賦予了行政相對人在提起行政訴訟時可一并請求法院對被訴行政行為所依據(jù)之規(guī)范性文件進行審查的權利,其第64條規(guī)定了法院對于規(guī)范性文件審查結果的處理方法。從而確立了行政訴訟中規(guī)范性文件附帶審查制度。本文第一章主要介紹了規(guī)范性文件的含義和相關問題,并對這樣一項制度的理論基礎和現(xiàn)實必要性做了分析并對其與其他相關概念制度的異同和關系作出比較。本文第二章主要是對新行政訴訟法對行政訴訟中規(guī)范性文件附帶審查的相關規(guī)定頒行后,其之于新法頒行前類似相關規(guī)定的進步意義和新法頒行后該制度所存在的主要問題的分析。在新法頒行以前,我國對于行政訴訟中規(guī)范性文件的司法審查早有相關規(guī)定,主要來自于最高人民法院的司法解釋和會談紀要等自定性規(guī)則,這些規(guī)定通過"自我賦權"的方式賦予了法院對行政訴訟中規(guī)范性文件進行審查的"隱性權力"。新法的頒行對這種"隱性權力"以明確化和正當化,并擴充了其中的內容,具有很大的進步意義。但就新法實施狀況而言,其在頒行之后實效性并不理想,存在著制度構建極不完善和一些規(guī)定不合理等問題。本文第三章主要是是對域外一些主要國家（地區(qū)）的抽象行政行為司法審查進行比較研究,對于行政規(guī)范性文件的附帶審查,先進國家地區(qū)雖然沒有完全相同的事物,但在抽象行政行為司法審查方面有著很成熟的制度成果,對于我國行政訴訟中規(guī)范性文件附帶審查的制度構建有著積極的借鑒意義。本文最后一章主要是從制度層面對新《行政訴訟法》所對定的行政訴訟中規(guī)范性文件附帶審查進行構建,雖然導致行政訴訟中規(guī)范性文件附帶審查實效性不理想的原因是多方面的,但從法規(guī)范學和法解釋學對現(xiàn)有規(guī)定進行補充和修正,在當下無疑具有立竿見影的效果,因此,在國內外已有理論成果和制度的基礎上,從審查程序、標準、方式和審查結果處理等方面對我國行政訴訟中規(guī)范性文件附帶審查的制度構建,使這樣一項制度在行政訴訟實踐中具有明確、統(tǒng)一的可操作性,從而使這一制度的初衷得到實現(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:On November 1, 2014, the new Administrative Litigation Law was enacted. Article 53 of the Act gives the administrative counterpart the right to request the court to review the normative documents on which the administrative act is charged. Article 64 provides the court's treatment of the results of the examination of normative documents. In order to establish the administrative proceedings in the regulatory documents attached to the review system. The first chapter mainly introduces the meaning and related problems of normative documents, analyzes the theoretical basis and practical necessity of such a system, and compares it with other related conceptual systems. The second chapter is mainly about the enactment of the relevant provisions of the new Administrative procedure Law on the incidental examination of the normative documents in the administrative litigation. It analyzes the progressive significance of similar regulations before the enactment of the new law and the main problems existing in the system after the enactment of the new law. Before the enactment of the new law, our country had relevant provisions for judicial review of normative documents in administrative proceedings, mainly from the self-qualitative rules of the Supreme people's Court, such as judicial interpretation and minutes of talks. These regulations endow the court with the "implicit power" to review normative documents in administrative proceedings by self-empowerment. The enactment of the new law is of great significance for the clarification and justification of this "implicit power" and the expansion of its contents. However, as far as the implementation of the new law is concerned, the actual effect of the new law is not ideal after its enactment, and there are some problems such as the imperfect construction of the system and the unreasonable provisions. The third chapter is a comparative study of the judicial review of abstract administrative acts in some major foreign countries (regions). Although there is no identical thing in the advanced countries or regions for the incidental review of administrative normative documents, However, there are very mature system achievements in the judicial review of abstract administrative acts, which has a positive reference significance for the construction of the system of incidental review of normative documents in administrative litigation in our country. The last chapter of this paper is mainly to construct the system of the new Administrative Litigation Law in the administrative litigation of regulatory documents attached to the review, Although there are many reasons that lead to the unsatisfactory effectiveness of the incidental review of normative documents in administrative litigation, there is no doubt that the supplement and amendment of the existing provisions from the view of law and hermeneutics have immediate effect at the present time, so, On the basis of existing theoretical achievements and systems at home and abroad, this paper constructs the system of incidental review of normative documents in administrative litigation in China from the aspects of review procedure, standards, methods and processing of examination results. So that such a system in the practice of administrative litigation has a clear, unified operability, so that the original intention of the system has been realized.
【學位授予單位】：中央民族大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 李小菲;;行政訴訟中附帶審查規(guī)范性文件研究[J];中國海事;2016年08期

2 章劍生;;論行政訴訟中規(guī)范性文件的合法性審查[J];福建行政學院學報;2016年03期

3 余軍;張文;;行政規(guī)范性文件司法審查權的實效性考察[J];法學研究;2016年02期

4 王紅衛(wèi);廖希飛;;行政訴訟中規(guī)范性文件附帶審查制度研究[J];行政法學研究;2015年06期

5 楊士林;;試論行政訴訟中規(guī)范性文件合法性審查的限度[J];法學論壇;2015年05期

6 程琥;;新《行政訴訟法》中規(guī)范性文件附帶審查制度研究[J];法律適用;2015年07期

7 周漢華;;規(guī)范性文件在《行政訴訟法》修改中的定位[J];法學;2014年08期

8 黃金榮;;“規(guī)范性文件”的法律界定及其效力[J];法學;2014年07期

9 何海波;;理想的《行政訴訟法》——《中華人民共和國行政訴訟法》學者建議稿[J];行政法學研究;2014年02期

10 裴兆斌;張弘;;行政訴訟中規(guī)范性文件的證據(jù)性質及其法治意義[J];中國人民公安大學學報(社會科學版);2013年04期

相關會議論文 前1條

1 張雨梅;高宏亮;;回歸與再造:規(guī)范性文件司法審查強度研究——以105則行政訴訟案例為分析樣本[A];尊重司法規(guī)律與刑事法律適用研究（上）——全國法院第27屆學術討論會獲獎論文集[C];2016年

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 ;關于行政訴訟法修正案(草案)的修改意見(上)[N];檢察日報;2014年

，

本文編號：2158380