本文選題：終身監(jiān)禁 + 死刑��； 參考：《河南財經政法大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：終身監(jiān)禁制度由來已久,歐洲大陸以及英美國家都將其視作死刑替代刑的重要途徑。在西方許多廢除死刑或者正在廢除死刑的國家里,終身監(jiān)禁已經成為一項特別重要的制度。該制度在中國的爭論早已泛起漣漪,上世紀末就有學者對此做過論述。2015年,《刑法修正案九》出臺,標志著我國的終身監(jiān)禁制度正式登臺。伴隨著反腐懲貪力度的加大,終身監(jiān)禁有望在今后的貪污賄賂案件中發(fā)揮更大的作用,在廢除死刑的進程中,其角色與作用也不可低估�！缎谭ㄐ拚妇拧飞б荒甓鄟�,該制度正由法條轉化為現實,由應然的理論轉化為實然的判決。然而,中國的終身監(jiān)禁制度仍處于“初級階段”,其性質、地位、適用范圍、實施效果等還有待于進一步研究,其所帶來的邏輯悖論和實務風險還不停的發(fā)酵。綜合國內外的理論研究和司法實踐來看,我國的終身監(jiān)禁究竟處于何種地位,應如何完善我國的終身監(jiān)禁制度,成為了亟待解決的問題。本文試圖從終身監(jiān)禁的立法完善和司法適用兩個角度探討中國的終身監(jiān)禁制度,通過從終身監(jiān)禁的概念、刑罰屬性以及立法背景等進行闡述。我國的終身監(jiān)禁制度是在當下反腐工作大力開展的時代背景下登上歷史的舞臺,在我國的刑罰體系中,終身監(jiān)禁制度并不是獨立存在的刑種。通過對英國、美國、俄羅斯、德國與日本等國家與終身監(jiān)禁制度的相關立法和司法現狀的研究,更深層次的了解西方各個國家,以期給具有我國特色分析刑事立法帶來重要的啟示。通過對比中外各國的終身監(jiān)禁制度,為中國死刑制度的改革和完善找到一條適合國情的本土化道路。中國這一時期的以修正刑法為重點的改革中,終身監(jiān)禁制度與我國備受關注的“廢除死刑”相吻合,更重要的是其使得在無期徒刑和死刑緩期執(zhí)行制度之間有了更好的銜接。本文又通過對法律的定位、對象以及執(zhí)行規(guī)定等等在我國終身監(jiān)禁制度的具體情況進行了仔細闡述,結合在司法實踐有可能遇到的狀況以及立法背景及現行狀況,大膽設想將我國的終身監(jiān)禁制度設立為具有中國特色的獨立刑種,以及將終身監(jiān)禁提升至總則的地位等等�？傊�,將終身監(jiān)禁制度加入到我國刑罰的體系,可以使我國的刑罰制度更加的完善,大大促進了具有特色的社會主義法制建設。
[Abstract]:Life imprisonment system has a long history and is regarded as an important alternative to death penalty in continental Europe as well as in Britain and America. Life imprisonment has become a particularly important system in many Western countries that abolish or are abolitionist. The controversy over this system in China has long been a ripple, which has been discussed by some scholars at the end of last century. In 2015, the Ninth Amendment of Criminal Law was introduced, which marked the formal appearance of life imprisonment system in China. With the intensification of anti-corruption and corruption punishment, life imprisonment is expected to play a greater role in future corruption and bribery cases, and its role and role should not be underestimated in the process of abolishing the death penalty. The Ninth Amendment to the Criminal Law has been in force for more than a year. The system is changing from law to reality and from theory to judgment. However, the system of life imprisonment in China is still in the "primary stage". Its nature, status, scope of application and effect of implementation need to be further studied, and the logical paradox and practical risks brought about by it are still fermenting. From the point of view of theoretical research and judicial practice at home and abroad, the status of life imprisonment in our country and how to perfect the system of life imprisonment have become an urgent problem to be solved. This paper attempts to explore the system of life imprisonment in China from the perspectives of legislative perfection and judicial application of life imprisonment, and expounds the concept of life imprisonment, the attribute of penalty and the legislative background. The system of life imprisonment in our country is stepping onto the stage of history under the background of the current anti-corruption work. In the penalty system of our country, the system of life imprisonment is not an independent type of punishment. Through the study of the legislative and judicial status of Britain, the United States, Russia, Germany and Japan and the system of life imprisonment, we can gain a deeper understanding of the various countries in the West. In order to bring important enlightenment to the analysis of criminal legislation with the characteristics of our country. By comparing the life imprisonment systems of China and foreign countries, we can find a local road suitable for the reform and perfection of China's death penalty system. In the reform of China's amended criminal law in this period, the system of life imprisonment coincides with the "abolition of the death penalty", which has attracted much attention in our country, and more importantly, it makes a better connection between the system of life imprisonment and the suspended execution of the death penalty. This article also through the legal orientation, the object as well as the execution stipulation and so on in our country life imprisonment system concrete situation has carried on the detailed elaboration, unifies in the judicial practice likely to encounter the situation as well as the legislative background and the present situation, It is a bold idea to set up the system of life imprisonment as the independent punishment with Chinese characteristics, and to elevate life imprisonment to the status of general principle and so on. In a word, adding the life imprisonment system to the penalty system of our country can make the penalty system of our country more perfect, and greatly promote the construction of socialist legal system with characteristics.
【學位授予單位】：河南財經政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 黎宏;;終身監(jiān)禁的法律性質及適用[J];法商研究;2016年03期

2 陳興良;;《刑法修正案(九)》的解讀與評論[J];貴州民族大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2016年01期

3 孫浩文;;淺析“終身監(jiān)禁”入刑之合理性——以刑法目的論為展開[J];中州大學學報;2016年01期

4 王邁;;掌冰握火的省檢察長——蔡寧[J];赤子(下旬);2016年01期

5 黃京平;;終身監(jiān)禁的法律定位與司法適用[J];北京聯合大學學報(人文社會科學版);2015年04期

6 趙秉志;;貪污受賄犯罪定罪量刑標準問題研究[J];中國法學;2015年01期

7 姜玉楠;;終身監(jiān)禁制度與我國刑罰體系的關系[J];法制與社會;2014年07期

8 黃永維;聶洪勇;李宗誠;;《關于辦理減刑、假釋案件具體應用法律若干問題的規(guī)定》的理解與適用[J];人民司法;2012年07期

9 劉憲權;;廢除死刑與提高生刑期限關系比較探析[J];法學;2011年10期

10 張明楷;;死刑的廢止不需要終身刑替代[J];法學研究;2008年02期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 沈帥;;淺析我國的終身監(jiān)禁制度[N];人民法院報;2016年

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 毛亞丙;我國終身監(jiān)禁制度若干問題研究[D];廣西民族大學;2016年

，

本文編號：2113725