【摘要】：比照孟德斯鳩《論法的精神》的納琴特英譯本,嚴復(fù)關(guān)于政體三分法的譯述不一,但總括以"民主"與"君主"兩類。對三種政體所表現(xiàn)的精神,嚴復(fù)則譯述為"民主以德"、"君主以禮"以及"專制以刑",然而對"德"、"禮"與"刑"的理解又是多樣的。這就表明嚴復(fù)的翻譯并不拘泥于原文,而是滲透著自己獨到的理解。基于此,他還認為孟德斯鳩的政體學說是綱領(lǐng)性的論點,是趨于理想范型的;必須放置在古今流變的歷史背景下來審視孟德斯鳩的政體學說;孟德斯鳩的政體學說并非放之四海而皆準,民主不過是一理想政體。
[Abstract]:Comparing with the English translation of Montesquieu's the Spirit of the Law, Yan Fu's translation of the Trilogy of the polity is divided into two categories: democracy and monarchy. Yan Fu interprets the spirit of the three regimes as "democracy with virtue", "monarch with courtesy" and "autocracy with punishment", but the understanding of "morality", "rite" and "punishment" is diverse. This shows that the translation of Yan Fu is not confined to the original text, but permeates its own unique understanding. Based on this, he also holds that Montesquieu's theory of polity is programmatic and tends to the ideal model, and must be placed in the historical background of ancient and modern changes to examine Montesquieu's theory of polity. Montesquieu's doctrine of polity is not universal. Democracy is but an ideal regime.
【作者單位】： 西南政法大學政治與公共管理學院暨民族政治研究院;吉林大學政治學理論博士后流動站;中國人民解放軍空軍航空大學人文社會科學系;
【基金】：吉林省社會科學基金項目“孫中山共和觀的貢獻及其影響研究”階段性成果(2011B003) 高校基本科研業(yè)務(wù)費項目“嚴復(fù)與孫中山的政體觀比較研究”階段性成果(2012QY027) “2014年西南政法大學科研資助(引進人才)項目”階段性成果
【分類號】：D092
，

本文編號：2151874