漢語詞匯閱讀中歧義詞素語義加工的過程
發(fā)布時間:2019-03-06 07:41
【摘要】:結合掩蔽啟動范式和ERP技術,利用歧義詞素的加工,本研究探討了歧義詞素語義的激活。根據(jù)歧義詞素類型的不同,將分為兩個實驗分別進行。實驗一中,歧義詞素兩含義使用頻率相當,無主要含義與次要含義之分,采用3×2兩因素被試內(nèi)設計,歧義詞素兩含義互為啟動刺激和目標刺激,兩變量分別為啟動詞類型(歧義詞素含義1vs.含義2vs.無關詞)和目標詞類型(歧義詞素含義1vs.含義2)。實驗二中,歧義詞素兩含義使用頻率相差較大,有主要含義和次要含義之分,兩變量分別為啟動詞類型(主要含義vs.次要含義vs.無關詞)和目標詞類型(主要含義vs.次要含義),實驗設計同實驗一。兩實驗的行為結果均發(fā)現(xiàn)啟動詞類型和目標詞類型存在交互作用,即只有當共享詞素同形同義的情況下,目標詞的加工才可能被啟動。兩實驗ERP結果有差異,實驗一的ERP結果進一步肯定了行為結果,在N250和N400兩個腦電成分上都發(fā)現(xiàn)了啟動類型和目標類型交互作用有關的效應,當啟動詞和目標詞共享詞素同形同義時,同時引發(fā)了N250和N400的變化;當共享詞素同形不同義時,時程分析時雖然也發(fā)現(xiàn)了N250的變化,但是N250的效應較小,小于同形同義所引發(fā)的N250效應,持續(xù)時間也較短。說明了在詞匯識別中歧義詞素語義可以激活,并對目標詞加工的早期加工階段發(fā)揮作用。實驗二中,當啟動詞和目標詞共享詞素時,可引發(fā)N250的變化,啟動類型和目標類型的交互作用體現(xiàn)在N400成分上,說明在詞匯加工早期階段可能歧義詞素所有語義都是有激活的,只不過語境信息沒有發(fā)揮選擇作用,但在后期整合中確實存在語義信息的激活。
[Abstract]:Based on masking priming paradigm and ERP technology, this paper discusses the activation of ambiguous morphemes by means of processing ambiguous morphemes. According to the different types of ambiguous morphemes, they are divided into two experiments. In experiment one, the two meanings of ambiguous morphemes were used in the same frequency, and there was no difference between the main meaning and the secondary meaning. The 3 脳 2 two factors were used to design the ambiguous morphemes, and the ambiguous morphemes were both priming stimuli and target stimuli. The two variables were the priming word type (ambiguity morpheme meaning 1 vs. Meaning 2 vs. And the target word type (ambiguity morpheme meaning 1) and the target word type (ambiguity morpheme meaning 1 vs. Meaning 2). In experiment 2, the frequency of using ambiguous morphemes is quite different, which is divided into main meaning and secondary meaning, and the two variables are the type of priming word (the main meaning vs.). Secondary meaning vs. Independent words) and target word types (main meaning vs. (secondary meaning), experimental design is the same as experiment one. The behavioral results of both experiments show that there is interaction between the priming word type and the target word type, that is, the processing of the target word can be initiated only when the shared morpheme is identical to the same meaning. The results of ERP were different between the two experiments. The results of ERP in experiment 1 further confirmed the behavioral results. Both N250 and N400 EEG components found the effects related to the interaction between the activation type and the target type. When the priming word and the target word share morpheme homonymy, the changes of N250 and N400 are caused at the same time. When shared morpheme isomorphism and different meanings, the change of N250 was also found in time history analysis, but the effect of N250 was smaller than that of N250 caused by isomorphism, and the duration of N250 was shorter. It shows that ambiguity morpheme semantics can be activated in word recognition and play an important role in the early stage of target word processing. In experiment 2, when initiators and target words share morphemes, the change of N250 can be caused. The interaction between start type and target type is reflected in N400 component, which indicates that all semantics of ambiguous morphemes may be activated in the early stage of word processing. However, contextual information does not play a selective role, but there is activation of semantic information in the late integration.
【學位授予單位】:東北師范大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:B842
本文編號:2435331
[Abstract]:Based on masking priming paradigm and ERP technology, this paper discusses the activation of ambiguous morphemes by means of processing ambiguous morphemes. According to the different types of ambiguous morphemes, they are divided into two experiments. In experiment one, the two meanings of ambiguous morphemes were used in the same frequency, and there was no difference between the main meaning and the secondary meaning. The 3 脳 2 two factors were used to design the ambiguous morphemes, and the ambiguous morphemes were both priming stimuli and target stimuli. The two variables were the priming word type (ambiguity morpheme meaning 1 vs. Meaning 2 vs. And the target word type (ambiguity morpheme meaning 1) and the target word type (ambiguity morpheme meaning 1 vs. Meaning 2). In experiment 2, the frequency of using ambiguous morphemes is quite different, which is divided into main meaning and secondary meaning, and the two variables are the type of priming word (the main meaning vs.). Secondary meaning vs. Independent words) and target word types (main meaning vs. (secondary meaning), experimental design is the same as experiment one. The behavioral results of both experiments show that there is interaction between the priming word type and the target word type, that is, the processing of the target word can be initiated only when the shared morpheme is identical to the same meaning. The results of ERP were different between the two experiments. The results of ERP in experiment 1 further confirmed the behavioral results. Both N250 and N400 EEG components found the effects related to the interaction between the activation type and the target type. When the priming word and the target word share morpheme homonymy, the changes of N250 and N400 are caused at the same time. When shared morpheme isomorphism and different meanings, the change of N250 was also found in time history analysis, but the effect of N250 was smaller than that of N250 caused by isomorphism, and the duration of N250 was shorter. It shows that ambiguity morpheme semantics can be activated in word recognition and play an important role in the early stage of target word processing. In experiment 2, when initiators and target words share morphemes, the change of N250 can be caused. The interaction between start type and target type is reflected in N400 component, which indicates that all semantics of ambiguous morphemes may be activated in the early stage of word processing. However, contextual information does not play a selective role, but there is activation of semantic information in the late integration.
【學位授予單位】:東北師范大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:B842
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前3條
1 趙思敏;吳巖;李天虹;郭慶童;;詞匯識別中歧義詞素語義加工:ERP研究[J];心理學報;2017年03期
2 張玲燕;金檀;田朝霞;;聚焦詞素語義加工的時間軸——先形后義還是形義并行?[J];心理科學進展;2013年08期
3 張玲燕;金檀;田朝霞;;詞素認知加工——基于形式還是基于語義?[J];心理科學;2013年03期
,本文編號:2435331
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2435331.html
教材專著