認知無意識思維效應與情感無意識思維效應的差異研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-01-27 10:54
【摘要】：根據(jù)Dijksterhuis提出的無意識思維理論(unconscious thought theory),個體決策質(zhì)量與思維模式、目標任務的復雜性存在緊密聯(lián)系。通過注意是否指向相關(guān)目標任務將思維區(qū)分為意識思維和無意識思維。研究發(fā)現(xiàn)在復雜條件下,無意識思維的決策質(zhì)量優(yōu)于意識思維,即無意識思維效應(unconscious thought effect,UTE)。已有研究表明,產(chǎn)生無意識思維效應存在多種邊界條件(moderators)。由此,探索無意識思維效應穩(wěn)定性的條件成為研究重點之一�；诮�(jīng)典無意識思維概念中認知、情感的二維定義,以及當前學界偏重認知維度的無意識思維研究現(xiàn)狀,本研究假設:通過剝離兩者,探索兩類(即認知和情感)無意識思維效應的差異,冀以獲得無意識思維效應的新邊界條件,推動無意識思維理論的發(fā)展。本研究以Dijksterhuis無意識思維概念中認知與情感二維度定義為邏輯起點,創(chuàng)制新實驗材料。以推理及概念形成任務材料為載體,考察“認知無意識思維效應”;以情感實驗材料為載體,考察“情感無意識思維效應”。厘清無意識思維效應中認知與情感的新邊界條件。本研究通過四個實驗得到如下結(jié)論:第一,解決純認知性復雜問題時,不存在“認知無意識思維效應”。即解決純認知性復雜問題時,認知意識思維組的成績顯著優(yōu)于認知無意識思維組成績和立即決策組成績。第二,解決純情感復雜問題時,存在“情感無意識思維效應”。即高情感喚醒的無意識思維組成績顯著優(yōu)于意識思維組;低情感喚醒的無意識思維組成績與意識思維組無顯著差異。第三,解決情境問題時(認知和情感交互作用),認知方面的信息對無意識思維效應的影響比情感方面更大。具體表現(xiàn)為:相較于純圖片材料,無意識思維效應只出現(xiàn)在圖文結(jié)合的實驗中。
[Abstract]:According to the unconscious thinking theory proposed by Dijksterhuis, the quality of individual decision-making and the mode of thinking of (unconscious thought theory), are closely related to the complexity of goal and task. The thinking is divided into conscious thinking and unconscious thinking by focusing on the relevant target tasks. It is found that the decision-making quality of unconscious thinking is superior to that of conscious thinking under complex conditions, that is, the unconscious thinking effect (unconscious thought effect,UTE). Studies have shown that there are many boundary conditions for (moderators). To produce unconscious thinking effects. Therefore, exploring the conditions for the stability of unconscious thinking effect has become one of the key research points. Based on the two-dimensional definition of cognition and emotion in the concept of classical unconscious thinking, and the current situation of the research on unconscious thinking in academic circles, this study hypothesizes: by stripping the two, In order to obtain the new boundary conditions of unconscious thinking effect and promote the development of unconscious thinking theory, this paper explores the differences between the two kinds of unconscious thinking effects (that is, cognition and emotion). Based on the definition of two dimensions of cognition and emotion in the concept of Dijksterhuis's unconscious thinking, this study creates new experimental materials. The "cognitive unconscious thinking effect" is investigated with the material of reasoning and conceptual formation task as the carrier, and the "emotional unconscious thinking effect" with the affective experimental material as the carrier. To clarify the new boundary conditions of cognition and emotion in unconscious thinking effect. The main conclusions of this study are as follows: first, there is no "cognitive unconscious thinking effect" when solving pure cognitive complex problems. That is to say, the scores of cognitive conscious thinking group are better than those of cognitive unconscious thinking group and immediate decision group when solving pure cognitive complex problems. Second, when solving complex problems of pure emotion, there is "emotional unconscious thinking effect". That is, the scores of unconscious thinking group with high emotional arousal were significantly better than those of conscious thinking group, while the scores of unconscious thinking group with low emotional arousal were not significantly different from those of conscious thinking group. Third, when solving situational problems (cognitive and affective interaction), cognitive information has a greater effect on unconscious thinking than affective. Compared with the pure picture material, the unconscious thinking effect only appears in the experiment of the combination of picture and text.
【學位授予單位】：寧波大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B842
本文編號：2416192
[Abstract]:According to the unconscious thinking theory proposed by Dijksterhuis, the quality of individual decision-making and the mode of thinking of (unconscious thought theory), are closely related to the complexity of goal and task. The thinking is divided into conscious thinking and unconscious thinking by focusing on the relevant target tasks. It is found that the decision-making quality of unconscious thinking is superior to that of conscious thinking under complex conditions, that is, the unconscious thinking effect (unconscious thought effect,UTE). Studies have shown that there are many boundary conditions for (moderators). To produce unconscious thinking effects. Therefore, exploring the conditions for the stability of unconscious thinking effect has become one of the key research points. Based on the two-dimensional definition of cognition and emotion in the concept of classical unconscious thinking, and the current situation of the research on unconscious thinking in academic circles, this study hypothesizes: by stripping the two, In order to obtain the new boundary conditions of unconscious thinking effect and promote the development of unconscious thinking theory, this paper explores the differences between the two kinds of unconscious thinking effects (that is, cognition and emotion). Based on the definition of two dimensions of cognition and emotion in the concept of Dijksterhuis's unconscious thinking, this study creates new experimental materials. The "cognitive unconscious thinking effect" is investigated with the material of reasoning and conceptual formation task as the carrier, and the "emotional unconscious thinking effect" with the affective experimental material as the carrier. To clarify the new boundary conditions of cognition and emotion in unconscious thinking effect. The main conclusions of this study are as follows: first, there is no "cognitive unconscious thinking effect" when solving pure cognitive complex problems. That is to say, the scores of cognitive conscious thinking group are better than those of cognitive unconscious thinking group and immediate decision group when solving pure cognitive complex problems. Second, when solving complex problems of pure emotion, there is "emotional unconscious thinking effect". That is, the scores of unconscious thinking group with high emotional arousal were significantly better than those of conscious thinking group, while the scores of unconscious thinking group with low emotional arousal were not significantly different from those of conscious thinking group. Third, when solving situational problems (cognitive and affective interaction), cognitive information has a greater effect on unconscious thinking than affective. Compared with the pure picture material, the unconscious thinking effect only appears in the experiment of the combination of picture and text.
【學位授予單位】：寧波大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B842
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 張瓊;原獻學;;無意識思維結(jié)果浮現(xiàn)的時間目標依賴性[J];心理科學;2015年01期
2 陳彬;張瓊;原獻學;;直覺與無意識思維決策質(zhì)量之比較[J];寧波大學學報(教育科學版);2014年03期
3 夏益;張聰;原獻學;;無意識思維效應研究的困境與出路[J];心理研究;2014年02期
4 劉磊鑫;蔡璇;原獻學;;知識遷移對無意識思維效應的作用[J];心理科學;2012年05期
5 劉春雷;王敏;張慶林;;創(chuàng)造性思維的腦機制[J];心理科學進展;2009年01期
6 龐捷敏;原獻學;李建升;;無意識研究新進展:無意識思維理論述評[J];心理學探新;2007年04期
相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條
1 李建升;無意識思維整體加工方式的研究[D];浙江大學;2014年
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前2條
1 張斌;消費者品牌印象形成中的無意識思維效應研究[D];湖南師范大學;2014年
2 劉磊鑫;無意識思維動機對無意識思維效應的作用[D];寧波大學;2013年
，本文編號：2416192
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2416192.html
教材專著
