【摘要】：匪戾氣是在中國漫長的社會變革史中形成的以暴力手段顛覆現(xiàn)有制度的具有破壞性質(zhì)的人格。它的核心內(nèi)涵是恨與破壞,具有匪戾氣的人無視規(guī)則,破壞現(xiàn)有的制度,卻又不具備建設(shè)新制度的意愿與能力,或者說具有匪戾氣人格的人將社會變革破壞性的一面無限放大了,而忽視了改革最根本的初衷是要建設(shè)一個新的有效的制度,他們只是為了以一種絕望式的激情彌補自己的人格缺陷。他們在破壞現(xiàn)有制度的同時,由于沒有精神文化的成長,沒有獨立的思考判別力,沒有建設(shè)新制度的方向和設(shè)想,結(jié)果還是重新確立原來的制度。一個國家或民族的人格特征很大程度上是由其文化決定的,因此,中國歷史悠久的革命文化塑造了中國人的匪戾氣人格這一提法也應(yīng)該是可行的。本研究旨在探究中國人匪戾氣人格的心理結(jié)構(gòu)及影響因素,通過文獻資料的查閱、深度訪談和行為取樣等質(zhì)性資料的分析,我們初步構(gòu)建了以自我價值定向理論為理論基礎(chǔ)的四象人格模型,經(jīng)過反復(fù)的預(yù)測和修訂,最終編制了一個由30個項目組成的“中國人匪戾氣人格量表”。本研究的結(jié)果表明:(1)匪戾氣人格呈現(xiàn)多維心理結(jié)構(gòu),問卷包含六個維度,分別是人性惡論、誠信缺失、唯利是圖、心態(tài)失衡、規(guī)則破壞、暴力行事。采取自評式5點計分。(2)問卷的信效度檢驗表明,問卷具有較好的內(nèi)部一致性、分半信度、內(nèi)容效度、建構(gòu)效度和效標效度�？梢宰鳛闇y量中國人匪戾氣人格的工具。(3)中國人的匪戾氣程度在性別上有顯著差異。男性匪戾氣程度顯著低于女性。從不同年齡段在匪戾氣量表上的得分差異分析來看,在總分上有顯著差異,除了誠信缺失和暴力行事維度外,在人性惡論、唯利是圖、心態(tài)失衡和規(guī)則破壞這四個個維度上,均存在顯著的差異。父母最高學(xué)歷在匪戾氣量表上總分上有顯著差異,在人性惡論、心態(tài)失衡、暴力行事上存在顯著差異。總體上,父母低學(xué)歷者匪戾氣得分顯著高于父母高學(xué)歷者。中國人匪戾氣程度在家庭居住地、是否獨生子、是否單親家庭上差異不顯著。
[Abstract]:Bandit hostility is a destructive personality formed in the long history of social transformation in China. Its core content is hate and destruction. People with bandit hostility ignore the rules and destroy the existing system, but they do not have the will and ability to build a new system. In other words, people with bandit hostility have magnified the destructive side of social change indefinitely, while neglecting the fundamental intention of the reform is to build a new and effective system. They're just trying to make up for their personality with a desperate passion. They destroyed the existing system at the same time, because there is no spiritual and cultural growth, there is no independent thinking discrimination, there is no direction and vision to build a new system, the result is to re-establish the original system. The personality of a country or a nation is largely determined by its culture. Therefore, it should be feasible for the Chinese revolutionary culture with a long history to shape the bandit belligerent personality of the Chinese people. The purpose of this study is to explore the psychological structure and influencing factors of Chinese bandit hostility personality, and to analyze the qualitative data such as literature review, in-depth interviews and behavioral sampling. A four-image personality model based on the theory of self-value orientation has been preliminarily constructed. After repeated prediction and revision, a Chinese Bandit hostility Personality scale composed of 30 items has been compiled. The results of this study are as follows: (1) the personality of bandit hostility presents multi-dimensional psychological structure, and the questionnaire contains six dimensions, namely, the theory of human nature and evil, the lack of good faith, profit seeking, mentality imbalance, rule breakage, and violence. (2) the reliability and validity test of the questionnaire shows that the questionnaire has good internal consistency, split-half reliability, content validity, constructive validity and criterion validity. It can be used as a tool to measure Chinese bandit hostility. (3) the degree of bandit hostility in Chinese is significantly different in sex. The degree of hostility of male bandits was significantly lower than that of females. According to the analysis of the scores of different age groups on the bandit hostility scale, there are significant differences in the total scores. Besides the dimensions of lack of honesty and violence, the four dimensions of human nature evil theory, profit seeking, mentality imbalance and rule breakage are four dimensions. There were significant differences between the two groups. There were significant differences in the total score of bandit hostility scale between parents, in the theory of human nature evil, the imbalance of mentality, and the violent behavior. On the whole, the score of bandit hostility of parents with low education was significantly higher than that of parents with high education. There is no significant difference in the degree of bandit hostility in family residence, only child and single parent family.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：曲阜師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B848

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 湯舒俊;郭永玉;;中國人厚黑人格的結(jié)構(gòu)及其問卷編制[J];心理學(xué)探新;2015年01期

2 黃光國;;迎接心理學(xué)發(fā)展的第三波[J];心理學(xué)探新;2014年01期

3 傅金珍;;轉(zhuǎn)型期社會心態(tài)失衡問題的治理[J];內(nèi)蒙古農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年05期

4 王克奇;;中國歷史上最后一個貴族——項羽論[J];文史哲;2012年05期

5 傅金珍;;社會心態(tài)失衡與治理對策研究[J];中共福建省委黨校學(xué)報;2011年10期

6 湯舒俊;郝佳;涂陽軍;;馬基雅弗利主義量表在中國大學(xué)生中的修訂[J];中國健康心理學(xué)雜志;2011年08期

7 陳東;;立足當(dāng)前社會現(xiàn)狀 培育良好社會心態(tài)[J];社會心理科學(xué);2011年Z1期

8 顏世安;;莊子性惡思想探討[J];中國哲學(xué)史;2009年04期

9 李瓊;郭永玉;;作為偏見影響因素的權(quán)威主義人格[J];心理科學(xué)進展;2007年06期

10 侯晉雄;;轉(zhuǎn)型期社會心態(tài)問題與構(gòu)建和諧社會[J];陜西理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2006年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 王利皎;暴戾心理維度與影響因素研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2015年

2 陳曉科;大學(xué)生權(quán)威人格的初步研究[D];重慶師范大學(xué);2014年

3 陶濁;李宗吾“厚黑學(xué)”思想研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2013年

4 胡旭穎;我國轉(zhuǎn)型期社會心態(tài)失衡問題研究[D];黑龍江省社會科學(xué)院;2013年

5 馬廣海;我國社會轉(zhuǎn)型期的階層分化與社會心態(tài)問題研究[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

6 簡佳;人際信任相關(guān)量表的信效度及其與大學(xué)生心理健康的相關(guān)性[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：2345110