【摘要】：目的 本研究利用癥狀自評量表(SCL-90)和自編基本情況調(diào)查表對移民心理健康狀況進(jìn)行縱向分析和橫向分析，研究干預(yù)后移民與干預(yù)前移民和空白對照移民心健康狀況的差異及其相關(guān)的影響因素，評估移民心理健康狀況干預(yù)效果，為待遷移民和已遷移民制訂合理、科學(xué)、可行的心理干預(yù)措施提供依據(jù)。 方法 本研究采用多階段抽樣，整群抽樣和分層抽樣相結(jié)合。將移民分為干預(yù)組和對照組，在初步調(diào)查結(jié)束后對干預(yù)組移民實(shí)施一系列干預(yù)措施，對照組移民不接受任何干預(yù)措施。運(yùn)用自編移民基本情況調(diào)查表和國際通用心理癥狀自評量表(SCL-90)對丹江口庫區(qū)干預(yù)后移民和未干預(yù)移民進(jìn)行問卷調(diào)查，利用SPSS17.0統(tǒng)計(jì)分析軟件進(jìn)行單因素和多因素分析等，以了解移民心理健康狀況的干預(yù)效果。 結(jié)果 1.干預(yù)后移民的SCL-90量表各因子分及總分明顯低于空白對照移民和干預(yù)前移民(P0.05)。 2.與空白對照移民分層相比，干預(yù)后移民在性別組、30~、45~和60~年齡組、不識字、小學(xué)和初中文化程度組、已婚和離異或喪偶婚姻組、職業(yè)組以及經(jīng)濟(jì)收入水平在2PL~組的心理健康狀況優(yōu)于空白對照移民。 3.與干預(yù)前移民相比，干預(yù)后移民在性別組、15~、30~和45~年齡組、初中和高中文化程度組、未婚和已婚婚姻組、農(nóng)民以及經(jīng)濟(jì)收入水平在2PL~組的心理健康狀況優(yōu)于干預(yù)前移民。 4.干預(yù)后移民的15~組、非農(nóng)業(yè)組和0~組的心理健康狀況較差。 5.在干預(yù)后移民自我主觀感受方面，對政策落實(shí)及發(fā)展信心評價(jià)較差的干預(yù)后移民整體上心理健康狀況較差；對現(xiàn)居住地評價(jià)認(rèn)為好和風(fēng)俗習(xí)慣適應(yīng)力好的干預(yù)后移民心理健康狀況顯著優(yōu)于評價(jià)一般和差的干預(yù)后移民；健康狀況好的干預(yù)后移民心理健康狀況也較好。 結(jié)論 本研究在調(diào)查南水北調(diào)丹江口庫區(qū)移民干預(yù)后心理狀況的基礎(chǔ)上，通過分層分析和因素分析的方法，，從性別、年齡、文化程度、婚姻狀況等多個(gè)方面分析了丹江口庫區(qū)移民心理健康干預(yù)效果。通過本次調(diào)查，發(fā)現(xiàn)干預(yù)后移民的心理健康狀況顯著優(yōu)于干預(yù)前移民和空白對照移民，干預(yù)后移民的心理健康狀況還受安置地風(fēng)俗習(xí)慣、政策滿意度等主觀因素的影響。建議相關(guān)工作部根據(jù)本研究移民干預(yù)效果的評估結(jié)果，改善移民心理干預(yù)方案，為今后開展同類工作提供依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:Objective to analyze the mental health status of immigrants by using symptom Checklist (SCL-90) and self-designed questionnaire. To study the difference of heart health status between immigrants and immigrants before and after intervention and the related influencing factors, to evaluate the effect of mental health intervention of migrants, and to establish reasonable and scientific methods for the migrants to be and have migrated. Feasible psychological intervention measures to provide the basis. Methods Multi-stage sampling, cluster sampling and stratified sampling were used in this study. The immigrants were divided into intervention group and control group. After the preliminary investigation, a series of intervention measures were carried out on the migrants of the intervention group, while the control group migrants did not accept any intervention measures. The self-made questionnaire on the basic situation of immigrants and the International General Psychological symptom Checklist (SCL-90) were used to investigate the immigrants and non-intervention migrants in Danjiangkou Reservoir area, and the single factor and multi-factor analysis were carried out by using the SPSS17.0 statistical analysis software. In order to understand the psychological health status of immigrants intervention effect. Result 1. The factor scores and total scores of SCL-90 scale of immigrants after intervention were significantly lower than those of blank control migrants and pre-intervention immigrants (P0.05). Compared with blank control, after intervention, immigrants in sex group, 45 ~ and 60 ~ age group, illiterate, primary school and junior middle school education group, married and divorced or widowed marriage group, The mental health status of occupational group and income group was better than that of control group. Compared with the pre-intervention immigrants, the post-intervention immigrants were in the sex group (30 ~ 15) and 45 ~ (th) age group, junior high school and senior high school education group, unmarried and married marriage group. The mental health status of farmers and economic income group in 2PL~ group was better than that of immigrants before intervention. The mental health status of the 15 ~ group, the non-agricultural group and the 0-group after the intervention was worse. 5. 5. In the aspect of self-subjective feeling of immigrants after intervention, the mental health status of immigrants after intervention was poor in terms of poor evaluation of policy implementation and development confidence. The psychological health status of immigrants after intervention was significantly better than that of general and poor ones, and the mental health status of immigrants after good health intervention was also better. Conclusion on the basis of investigation of psychological status of immigrants in Danjiangkou Reservoir area of South-to-North Water diversion Project, this study is based on stratified analysis and factor analysis, from gender, age, and education level. Marital status and other aspects of the analysis of the Danjiangkou reservoir area immigrant mental health intervention effect. Through this investigation, it is found that the mental health status of immigrants after intervention is significantly better than that of immigrants and blank immigrants before intervention, and the mental health status of immigrants after intervention is also affected by subjective factors such as customs and habits of resettlement place, policy satisfaction and so on. It is suggested that the relevant departments should improve the psychological intervention program of immigrants according to the results of the evaluation of the effect of immigration intervention in order to provide the basis for similar work in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D632.4;B844

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李雪平;對心理健康標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的解析[J];西華師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年05期

2 莊立輝;郭繼志;汪洋;盧官廬;嚴(yán)瑞雪;宋棠;;水庫移民心理問題研究現(xiàn)狀及展望[J];中國社會(huì)醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2006年04期

3 向聯(lián)華;;關(guān)于水庫移民后期扶持方式的思考[J];湖南水利水電;2009年02期

4 張強(qiáng),陳麗嬌 ,趙虎;大學(xué)生社會(huì)支持與心理健康的關(guān)系[J];中國健康心理學(xué)雜志;2004年06期

5 邊俊士;井西學(xué);莊娜;;癥狀自評量表(SCL-90)在心理健康研究中應(yīng)用的爭議[J];中國健康心理學(xué)雜志;2008年02期

6 李輝;王倩;;關(guān)于農(nóng)民心理健康狀況的元分析[J];中國健康心理學(xué)雜志;2010年10期

7 陳春萍;;國內(nèi)關(guān)于心理健康標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的研究[J];寧波大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(教育科學(xué)版);2008年05期

8 劉振興;潘夢雅;岳夢然;;南水北調(diào)中線工程移民政策的回應(yīng)探討——以河南省淅川籍農(nóng)村移民為例[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì)與科技;2012年04期

9 郭劍平;;風(fēng)俗習(xí)慣在民事調(diào)解中的適用研究[J];民間法;2012年00期

10 楊濤;孫鳳枝;;河南省南水北調(diào)丹江口庫區(qū)外遷移民心理分析及對策[J];河南水利與南水北調(diào);2013年01期

本文編號：2208744