【摘要】：賴(lài)肖爾(Edwin O.Reischauer)生于1910年的日本,是美國(guó)著名的歷史學(xué)家、外交家,是美國(guó)著名的“日本通”,曾擔(dān)任美國(guó)駐日大使。賴(lài)肖爾對(duì)日本社會(huì)有著很深的觀(guān)察和研究,并形成了自己的理論觀(guān)點(diǎn)----日本現(xiàn)代化論。該理論以戰(zhàn)后美日同盟為背景,主張肯定日本的近代,認(rèn)為日本在近代通過(guò)明治維新改革,在東方率先實(shí)現(xiàn)了現(xiàn)代化和民族獨(dú)立。井上清(Inoue Kiyoshi)生于1913年,是日本著名的馬克思主義歷史學(xué)家,曾擔(dān)任京都大學(xué)日本歷史研究室主任。井上清的近代日本觀(guān)以戰(zhàn)后日本學(xué)界對(duì)戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的反思為背景,主張對(duì)日本近代的侵略戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)和帝國(guó)主義進(jìn)行徹底反省,軍國(guó)主義在日本的滋生土壤必須得到肅清,天皇應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的責(zé)任,主張以批判的視角去審視日本的近代歷史。由于二人不同的成長(zhǎng)經(jīng)歷和身份,秉承著不同的歷史觀(guān),在不同的時(shí)代背景下,二人對(duì)日本近代歷史的認(rèn)識(shí)存在著很大的不同。賴(lài)肖爾肯定日本的近代,而井上清則對(duì)此持批判態(tài)度。以往的研究多側(cè)重于賴(lài)肖爾作為美國(guó)駐日大使的政治生涯和井上清作為日本左翼馬克思主義學(xué)者對(duì)日本軍國(guó)主義和釣魚(yú)島歸屬問(wèn)題的研究。二人雖然同作為日本研究的著名學(xué)者,又出生于同一年代,但學(xué)界之前沒(méi)有將二人不同的近代日本觀(guān)進(jìn)行過(guò)比較。本文將對(duì)二人對(duì)天皇制、明治維新、侵華戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)、整體近代日本觀(guān)的觀(guān)點(diǎn)進(jìn)行比較。通過(guò)對(duì)比將會(huì)為我們的日本研究提供更多的視角,幫助我們?nèi)�、多角度地去看待這段日本歷史上的特殊時(shí)期,促進(jìn)日本研究的向前推進(jìn)。第一章分為兩個(gè)部分。第一部分首先介紹了賴(lài)肖爾日本和美國(guó)的雙重教育背景和賴(lài)肖爾回到美國(guó)哈佛大學(xué)任教后參與美國(guó)外交活動(dòng)的經(jīng)歷,其次介紹了賴(lài)肖爾的著作情況。第二部分首先介紹了井上清在京都大學(xué)的學(xué)術(shù)生涯及其與中國(guó)的友好往來(lái),其次介紹了井上清的著作情況。第二章中本文運(yùn)用了中文、英文、日文資料,將二人對(duì)天皇制、明治維新、侵華戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)、整體近代日本觀(guān)的觀(guān)點(diǎn)進(jìn)行分析和對(duì)比,闡述二人觀(guān)點(diǎn)的不同之處。第三章分析二人不同的近代日本觀(guān)的形成原因,并對(duì)二人不同的近代日本觀(guān)做出評(píng)價(jià)。結(jié)語(yǔ)部分總結(jié)了二人不同的近代日本觀(guān),指出了本文的研究意義,即為我們多層次、多角度地分析日本近代這一日本歷史上的特殊時(shí)期提供不同的研究視角,幫助我們?nèi)娣治鋈毡镜慕鷼v史。
[Abstract]:Reischauer (Edwin O.Reischauer), born in 1910 in Japan, is a famous American historian, diplomat and famous American "Japan Tong", who served as American ambassador to Japan. Reischauer observed and studied Japanese society deeply and formed his own theory of Japanese modernization. The theory is based on the postwar alliance between the United States and Japan, which advocates the affirmation of Japan's modern times, and holds that Japan, through the Meiji Restoration Reform in modern times, took the lead in realizing modernization and national independence in the East. Born in 1913, Inoue Kiyoshi (Inoue Kiyoshi) is Japan's leading Marxist historian and former director of the Japanese History Research Department at Kyoto University. Inoue Kiyoshi's modern view of Japan is based on the reflection of the Japanese academic circles on the war after the war, and advocates a thorough introspection of the aggressive war and imperialism in modern Japan, and the breeding ground of militarism in Japan must be eliminated. The emperor should bear the responsibility of war and advocate a critical view of Japan's modern history. Due to their different growth experiences and identities, they hold different views on history. Under different historical background, they have very different understanding of Japanese modern history. Reischauer affirmed Japan's modern times, and Inoue Kiyoshi was critical of it. Previous studies have focused on Reischauer's political career as American ambassador to Japan and Inoue Kiyoshi's research on Japanese militarism and the ownership of Diaoyu Islands as Japanese left-wing Marxist scholars. Although they were both famous scholars in Japanese studies and were born in the same time, they had not been compared with their different views of modern Japan before. This paper compares the views of the two against the imperial system, the Meiji Restoration, the War of aggression against China and the overall view of modern Japan. The comparison will provide more perspective for our Japanese study, help us to look at this special period in Japanese history comprehensively and from many angles, and promote the advancement of Japanese research. The first chapter is divided into two parts. The first part introduces the dual educational background of Reischauer in Japan and the United States, and the experience of Reischauer's participation in American diplomatic activities after he returned to Harvard University to teach in the United States, and then introduces the works of Reischauer. The second part introduces Inoue Kiyoshi's academic career in Kyoto University and his friendship with China, and then introduces Inoue Kiyoshi's works. In the second chapter, using Chinese, English and Japanese materials, the author analyzes and compares the views of the two people on the imperial system, the Meiji Restoration, the War of invasion of China and the whole modern Japanese view, and expounds the differences between the two people's views. The third chapter analyzes the formation reasons of their different views on modern Japan, and makes an evaluation of their different views of modern Japan. The conclusion summarizes the two people's different views on modern Japan and points out the significance of this paper, that is, to provide different perspectives for us to analyze this special period in modern Japanese history. To help us analyze Japan's modern history in a comprehensive way.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：K313.4

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 井上清;;日本歷史學(xué)家井上清的信[J];新文學(xué)史料;1982年03期

2 黎報(bào);日本井上清教授來(lái)我院作學(xué)術(shù)報(bào)告[J];天津師院學(xué)報(bào);1980年03期

3 俞辛q;日本的進(jìn)步史學(xué)家——井上清教授[J];世界歷史;1979年02期

4 ;日本著名歷史學(xué)家井上清教授應(yīng)邀到我校講學(xué)[J];延邊大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1980年03期

5 管寧;光勝;;日本井上清教授來(lái)南開(kāi)大學(xué)講學(xué)[J];歷史教學(xué);1980年05期

6 曉鳴;日本著名歷史學(xué)家井上清在呼和浩特作學(xué)術(shù)報(bào)告[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會(huì)科學(xué);1984年03期

7 孫志民;日本著名歷史學(xué)家井上清先生來(lái)校講學(xué)[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1984年03期

8 本刊編輯部;日本著名學(xué)者井上清先生談釣魚(yú)島歷史及主權(quán)歸屬問(wèn)題[J];民國(guó)檔案;1997年03期

9 周崢嶸;;《井上清:釣魚(yú)列島屬于中國(guó)》一文廣受關(guān)注[J];世紀(jì);2012年06期

10 黃穎;;辨析原田禹雄對(duì)冊(cè)封使錄中釣魚(yú)島問(wèn)題的誤區(qū)[J];福建教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年06期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 傅波;;想到了井上清教授——他說(shuō):“釣魚(yú)島是中國(guó)的”[A];中國(guó)中日關(guān)系史研究·2012年第4期（總第109期）[C];2012年

2 陳平平;;論井上清對(duì)琉球問(wèn)題的研究與琉球問(wèn)題再議——紀(jì)念井上清誕辰100周年之二[A];鄭和研究2013年第3期[C];2013年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前4條

1 記者 杲文川;“井上清文庫(kù)”在近代史所建成[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院院報(bào);2004年

2 熊志強(qiáng);來(lái)自日本國(guó)內(nèi)的正義之聲[N];中國(guó)國(guó)土資源報(bào);2012年

3 記者 王大軍;日著名史學(xué)家井上清逝世[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2001年

4 上海社科院國(guó)際關(guān)系研究所世界史專(zhuān)業(yè)研究生 劉夏妮;井上清：日本史學(xué)界的正義之聲[N];解放日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 馮春雨;賴(lài)肖爾與井上清的近代日本觀(guān)之比較[D];吉林大學(xué);2017年

，

本文編號(hào)：2189192