本文關(guān)鍵詞： 印度尼西亞 馬來(lái)西亞 英國(guó) 美國(guó) 對(duì)抗　出處：《華中師范大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：第二次世界大戰(zhàn)結(jié)束后,馬來(lái)亞和印度尼西亞都通過(guò)與殖民宗主國(guó)進(jìn)行斗爭(zhēng),獲得了民族獨(dú)立,但西方國(guó)家在這一地區(qū)的殖民統(tǒng)治并沒(méi)有完全結(jié)束。英國(guó)在戰(zhàn)后的經(jīng)濟(jì)每況愈下,不得不結(jié)束其在東南亞的殖民統(tǒng)治,但是為了保留英國(guó)在這一地區(qū)的勢(shì)力,他緊緊抓住馬來(lái)亞這根救命稻草,出臺(tái)了“馬來(lái)西亞計(jì)劃”,被印尼視為是包圍印尼的新殖民主義計(jì)劃,所以印尼出臺(tái)了“粉碎馬來(lái)西亞”的政策,成為20世紀(jì)60年代重要的國(guó)際事件。 本文研究了有著血緣關(guān)系的印度尼西亞與馬來(lái)西亞走向?qū)沟谋尘?從各個(gè)角度分析了印度尼西亞與馬來(lái)西亞對(duì)抗的過(guò)程,并探討了對(duì)抗及對(duì)抗的結(jié)束對(duì)印度尼西亞與馬來(lái)西亞雙方、東南亞地區(qū)、甚至世界所產(chǎn)生的影響。 第一部分從東南亞地區(qū)的冷戰(zhàn)格局,馬來(lái)亞與英國(guó)的關(guān)系及印尼當(dāng)時(shí)的國(guó)內(nèi)國(guó)外狀況三個(gè)方面研究了印度尼西亞與馬來(lái)西亞對(duì)抗的背景。馬來(lái)亞等東南亞國(guó)家和地區(qū)渴望獲得民族獨(dú)立,英國(guó)在二戰(zhàn)后也沒(méi)有足夠的經(jīng)費(fèi)來(lái)經(jīng)營(yíng)其殖民統(tǒng)治,在冒險(xiǎn)主義蘇加諾的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)下印尼經(jīng)濟(jì)落后,這一切在冷戰(zhàn)的氛圍中,很容易引起摩擦。 第二部分從輿論方面、外交方面、經(jīng)濟(jì)方面、軍事方面分析了印馬對(duì)抗的全過(guò)程。印尼與馬來(lái)西亞的對(duì)抗最初集中在輿論方面和小規(guī)模的軍事入侵。馬來(lái)西亞聯(lián)邦成立之后,印尼果斷地與馬來(lái)西亞斷絕了經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易和外交。英國(guó)、美國(guó)為督促印度尼西亞停止對(duì)抗而對(duì)印尼施加了各種壓力。 第三部分是關(guān)于對(duì)抗及對(duì)抗的結(jié)束對(duì)各方的影響。對(duì)抗結(jié)束之后,印尼國(guó)內(nèi)局勢(shì)嚴(yán)重惡化,原來(lái)與中國(guó)關(guān)系友好的印尼,因?yàn)橐恍┱`會(huì)而與中國(guó)關(guān)系破裂,蘇哈托掌權(quán)之后,印尼轉(zhuǎn)而與英美的關(guān)系有了改善,接受美援。對(duì)抗的結(jié)束為東南亞地區(qū)的和平、穩(wěn)定和發(fā)展奠定了基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:After the end of the second World War, Malaya and Indonesia gained their national independence through the struggle against the colonial power. But the colonial rule of the Western countries in this region has not completely ended. Britain's post-war economic deterioration, had to end its colonial rule in Southeast Asia, but in order to retain British power in the region. He clung to Malaya as a life-saving straw and launched the "Malaysia Plan", which was regarded by Indonesia as a neo-colonial plan to encircle Indonesia, so Indonesia introduced the policy of "smashing Malaysia." Became an important international event in 1960s. This paper studies the background of Indonesia and Malaysia to confrontation, and analyzes the process of Indonesia and Malaysia confrontation from various angles. It also discusses the impact of confrontation and the end of confrontation on both sides of Indonesia and Malaysia, Southeast Asia and even the world. The first part is from the Cold War pattern in Southeast Asia. The relationship between Malaya and Britain and the domestic and foreign situation of Indonesia at that time have studied the background of the confrontation between Indonesia and Malaysia. Malaya and other Southeast Asian countries and regions yearn for national independence. Britain did not have enough money to run its colonial rule after World War II, and Indonesia's economic backwardness under the adventurism of Sukarno was likely to cause friction in the cold war atmosphere. The second part is from the public opinion aspect, the diplomacy aspect, the economic aspect. The military aspect analyzed the whole process of the India-Malaysia confrontation. The confrontation between Indonesia and Malaysia was initially focused on public opinion and small-scale military invasion. After the establishment of the Malaysian Federation. Indonesia has decisively cut off economic trade and diplomacy with Malaysia. Britain and the United States have put all sorts of pressure on Indonesia to stop fighting. The third part deals with the impact of confrontation and the end of confrontation on all parties. After the confrontation ended, the domestic situation in Indonesia deteriorated seriously. Indonesia, which originally had friendly relations with China, broke up with China because of some misunderstanding. After Suharto came to power, Indonesia's relations with Britain and the United States improved. The end of confrontation laid the foundation for peace, stability and development in Southeast Asia.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：K3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 沈燕清;英國(guó)在馬來(lái)西亞聯(lián)邦建立及分裂中的角色分析[J];東南亞;2005年02期

2 何躍;;論戰(zhàn)后英國(guó)放棄馬來(lái)亞的動(dòng)機(jī)與策略[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年01期

3 王艷芬;馬來(lái)亞的獨(dú)立與英國(guó)殖民撤退的策略[J];史學(xué)月刊;2001年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1452839