本文選題：清末民初 + 桐城派　； 參考：《安徽史學(xué)》2017年04期

【摘要】：清末民初桐城派學(xué)人在史學(xué)領(lǐng)域頗有作為和影響,尤其是中國史編撰方面。他們或編纂貫通古今的中國通史,或以史學(xué)家敏銳的意識(shí)記載親身經(jīng)歷的民國史,或參修政府組織的官方正史。他們的中國史編撰具有幾個(gè)方面的特點(diǎn):宣揚(yáng)進(jìn)化之史觀,撰寫歷代興衰之內(nèi)容,注重史料之搜集和征引,追求真實(shí)之歷史,書寫雅潔之語言。清末民初桐城派的中國史編撰新舊雜糅,既能因時(shí)而變,又能堅(jiān)守著傳統(tǒng)史學(xué)的一些特點(diǎn),真實(shí)地存在于那個(gè)時(shí)代的學(xué)術(shù)譜系之中,不應(yīng)被忽視和遺漏。
[Abstract]:Tongcheng School scholars in the late Qing Dynasty and early Republic of China had great influence in the field of historiography, especially in the compilation of Chinese history. They either compiled the general history of ancient and modern China, or recorded the history of the Republic of China with the keen consciousness of historians, or they participated in the official history of government organizations. Their compilation of Chinese history has several characteristics: to preach the historical view of evolution, to write the contents of the rise and fall of the past dynasties, to pay attention to the collection and quotation of historical data, to pursue the true history and to write the elegant and clean language. Tongcheng School's compilation of Chinese history in the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China is a mixture of the new and the old, which can not only change from time to time, but also adhere to some characteristics of traditional historiography, and truly exist in the academic genealogy of that era, and should not be ignored and omitted.
【作者單位】： 安徽大學(xué)歷史系;
【分類號(hào)】：K092

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 賀晨;;歷史敘述的深層話語空間——基于對《史記》和《劍橋中國史》中“商鞅變法”話語構(gòu)建的對比分析[J];寧波廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2100451