本文選題：社會(huì)階層　切入點(diǎn)：系統(tǒng)公正感　出處：《華中師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：對(duì)社會(huì)心態(tài)的關(guān)注是如今學(xué)界的一個(gè)熱點(diǎn)研究問題,這其中社會(huì)階層地位較低的個(gè)體引起了無論是執(zhí)政者還是研究者更多的關(guān)注。這些低階層者是否感受到了社會(huì)的公平正義,這關(guān)系到社會(huì)的和諧與穩(wěn)定。對(duì)于這個(gè)問題,系統(tǒng)公正理論曾指出,社會(huì)階層較低的個(gè)體更傾向于認(rèn)為其所在的社會(huì)系統(tǒng)的公正的,合理的,這一觀點(diǎn)被后來研究者稱為地位公正化假設(shè)。在實(shí)證研究中,地位公正化假設(shè)得到了不少研究結(jié)論的支持。但也有相當(dāng)數(shù)量的研究,得出階層越高的人越認(rèn)為社會(huì)公正的結(jié)論�；谶@一理論爭(zhēng)議及其在實(shí)踐應(yīng)用中的價(jià)值,本研究旨在針對(duì)個(gè)體所在社會(huì)階層影響其系統(tǒng)公正感的效應(yīng)是否存在,是否通過其他心理過程起作用,以及是否受到其他變量的調(diào)節(jié)等幾方面展開研究。 研究一采用問卷法,采用非在校大學(xué)生的成年人作為研究被試,通過在中國(guó)不同省份發(fā)放問卷,共得到有效樣本707名。分層回歸結(jié)果表明,在控制了無關(guān)變量后,個(gè)體的主觀社會(huì)階層水平對(duì)其系統(tǒng)公正感的預(yù)測(cè)作用顯著,主觀階層高的被試更傾向于認(rèn)為系統(tǒng)是公正的。 在研究二中,引入個(gè)體對(duì)社會(huì)貧富差距的歸因傾向這一變量,考察其是否在主觀社會(huì)階層影響系統(tǒng)公正感的過程中起到的中介作用。研究以142名在校大學(xué)生作為被試,在控制了無關(guān)變量之后,結(jié)果顯示,貧富差距內(nèi)歸因傾向在社會(huì)階層和系統(tǒng)公正感之間的部分中介效應(yīng)顯著。個(gè)體的主觀社會(huì)階層水平越高,其貧富差距內(nèi)歸因傾向也越高,因而其系統(tǒng)公正感也就越強(qiáng)。 在研究三中,引入控制感作為調(diào)節(jié)變量,看其能否調(diào)節(jié)研究二中所得的中介模型。研究以208名在校大學(xué)生作為被試,將其隨機(jī)分為兩個(gè)組,通過啟動(dòng)任務(wù)讓一部分被試暫時(shí)體驗(yàn)到較高控制感,而讓另一部分暫時(shí)體驗(yàn)較低控制感。結(jié)果顯示,有調(diào)節(jié)的中介模型成立,貧富差距內(nèi)歸因傾向?qū)τ谥饔^社會(huì)階層影響系統(tǒng)公正感的中介作用,受到了控制感水平的調(diào)節(jié)：在無控制感的情況下,該中介模型成立；而在有控制感的情況下,社會(huì)階層的貧富歸因傾向差異不顯著,社會(huì)階層與系統(tǒng)公正感的預(yù)測(cè)作用也不顯著,中介模型不成立。這一結(jié)果既是對(duì)于地位公正化假設(shè)為何存在爭(zhēng)議進(jìn)行的有益探索,也可為社會(huì)管理提供一定的借鑒。
[Abstract]:Attention to social psychology is a hot research issue in academic circles nowadays, in which the individuals with lower social class status have aroused more attention both in power and researcher. Do these lower class people feel the fairness and justice of society? This is related to social harmony and stability. On this issue, the theory of systemic justice has pointed out that individuals with lower social strata tend to think that the social system in which they belong is just and reasonable. This view was later referred to by researchers as the hypothesis of status justice. In the empirical study, the hypothesis of status justice has been supported by many conclusions, but there is also a considerable number of studies. The conclusion is that the higher the social stratum is, the more the social justice is. Based on this theoretical controversy and its value in practical application, this study aims at the existence of the effect that the individual social stratum affects its sense of systemic justice. Whether it works through other psychological processes, and whether it is regulated by other variables. In the first study, 707 valid samples were obtained by using non-college students as subjects, and 707 valid samples were obtained by issuing questionnaires in different provinces of China. The results of stratified regression showed that, after controlling for unrelated variables, a total of 707 effective samples were obtained. The subjective social stratum level of the individual plays a significant role in predicting the sense of system justice, and the subjects with high subjective stratum tend to think that the system is fair. In the second study, we introduced the individual attribution tendency to the gap between the rich and the poor, and examined whether it played an intermediary role in the process of subjective social stratum influencing the sense of system justice. 142 college students were selected as subjects. After controlling the independent variables, the results show that the partial intermediary effect between the social stratum and the sense of systemic justice is significant, and the higher the subjective social stratum level, the higher the intra-attribution tendency of the gap between the rich and the poor. As a result, its sense of system justice is stronger. In the third study, we introduced the sense of control as a regulating variable to see if it could adjust the intermediary model of the second middle school. 208 college students were randomly divided into two groups. By initiating tasks, some subjects experienced a higher sense of control temporarily, while others experienced a lower sense of control. The results showed that the moderated intermediary model was established. The mediating effect of the attribution tendency within the gap between the rich and the poor on the subjective social stratum's influence on the sense of justice is regulated by the level of sense of control: in the case of no sense of control, the intermediary model is established, while in the case of the sense of control, the intermediary model is established. There is no significant difference in the attribution tendency between the rich and the poor in the social stratum, the predictive function of the social stratum and the sense of systematic justice is not significant, and the intermediary model is not established. This result is a useful exploration of why the hypothesis of status justice exists. Also can provide certain reference for social management.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：C912.61

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄭潔;家庭社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)地位與大學(xué)生就業(yè)——一個(gè)社會(huì)資本的視角[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年03期

2 王甫勤;;新的社會(huì)階層的階層地位與社會(huì)態(tài)度[J];重慶社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年04期

3 馬廣海;;貧富差距背景下的社會(huì)心態(tài)簡(jiǎn)析[J];東岳論叢;2008年05期

4 張書維;王二平;周潔;;相對(duì)剝奪與相對(duì)滿意:群體性事件的動(dòng)因分析[J];公共管理學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

5 李靜;郭永玉;;如何破解中國(guó)的“幸福悖論”[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年06期

6 王春光,李煒;當(dāng)代中國(guó)社會(huì)階層的主觀性建構(gòu)和客觀實(shí)在[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);2002年04期

7 李婷娜;顧昭明;;大學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)適應(yīng)現(xiàn)狀與個(gè)體控制感的關(guān)系研究[J];中國(guó)健康心理學(xué)雜志;2011年03期

8 王俊秀;楊宜音;陳午晴;;中國(guó)社會(huì)心態(tài)調(diào)查報(bào)告[J];民主與科學(xué);2007年02期

9 郭永玉;李靜;胡小勇;;人格心理學(xué):人性及其差異的研究[J];中國(guó)科學(xué)院院刊;2012年S1期

10 王芳;劉力;許燕;蔣獎(jiǎng);孫曉敏;;聚焦重大社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí)問題的社會(huì)心理學(xué)研究[J];中國(guó)科學(xué)院院刊;2012年S1期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王甫勤;社會(huì)流動(dòng)與分配公平感研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1610522