本文關鍵詞： 黑格爾法哲學批判 市民社會 政治國家 唯物主義　出處：《遼寧大學》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：馬克思在克羅茨納赫期間閱讀了大量的關于歷史、政治和法的著作，認真研究和分析了黑格爾與費爾巴哈的著作，并結(jié)合在《萊茵報》工作期間遇到的現(xiàn)實問題，在此基礎上馬克思寫成了《黑格爾法哲學批判》，這是一部馬克思早期未完成的法哲學著作。在《黑格爾法哲學批判》中，馬克思在世界觀上同黑格爾分道揚鑣，他對黑格爾的國家理論開始從懷疑走向了批判，，這部著作是法哲學變革的真正發(fā)源地，也是馬克思法哲學觀的邏輯起點，在馬克思法哲學思想史上占有極其重要的地位。因此我們就要深入探尋對黑格爾法哲學批判的誘因以及其法哲學思想理論的邏輯起點。本文力求通過對《黑格爾法哲學批判》的探析，試圖揭示馬克思法哲學的理論意義與實際意義。全文共分為四部分： 第一部分主要探析馬克思對黑格爾法哲學批判的誘因及理論基礎。馬克思在《萊茵報》擔任主編時期遇到的許多關于經(jīng)濟的、社會的和政治的事件，這使得他對理性主義的社會觀和國家觀發(fā)生了動搖，這是他向唯物史觀發(fā)展的前兆。 第二部分主要是梳理《黑格爾法哲學批判》的主要內(nèi)容。主要從三個方面闡述馬克思對黑格爾法哲學觀的批判：首先是馬克思對黑格爾“市民社會與國家關系”的批判；再次是馬克思對國家與私有財產(chǎn)關系的批判；最后是馬克思對立憲君主制的批判。 第三部分探析了《黑格爾法哲學批判導言》是如何將《黑格爾法哲學批判》引向深入。在《〈黑格爾法哲學批判〉導言》中，馬克思科學地闡釋了人類解放和政治解放的區(qū)別。 第四部分論述了《黑格爾法哲學批判》的理論和現(xiàn)實意義。通過對馬克思法哲學觀的深入探析，尋找馬克思法哲學思想中觀察和解決實際問題的方法，并以此來指導中國的現(xiàn)實社會。
[Abstract]:Marx read a lot of works on history, politics and law during the period of Kroznach, and studied and analyzed the works of Hegel and Feuerbach. On the basis of the practical problems encountered during his work, Marx wrote "criticism of Hegel's philosophy of Law". In the critique of Hegel's philosophy of Law, Marx parted ways with Hegel in his worldview, and his theory of state began to change from doubt to criticism. This work is the real birthplace of the reform of philosophy of law and the logical starting point of Marxist philosophy of law. Therefore, we should explore the cause of criticism of Hegel's philosophy of law and the logical starting point of his theory of legal philosophy. The criticism of philosophy of Law. This paper attempts to reveal the theoretical and practical significance of Marxist philosophy of law. The first part mainly analyzes the inducement and theoretical basis of Marx's criticism of Hegel's philosophy of law. This makes him waver in his view of society and state of rationalism, which is the precursor of his development to historical materialism. The second part is to sort out the main content of the criticism of Hegel's philosophy of law. It mainly expounds Marx's criticism of Hegel's philosophy of law from three aspects: first, Marx's criticism of Hegel. Criticism of the relationship between the Civil Society and the State; Thirdly, Marx criticizes the relationship between state and private property. Finally, Marx's critique of constitutional monarchy. The third part analyzes how the introduction to Hegel's criticism of legal philosophy leads Hegel's criticism of philosophy of law to the depth, in the introduction of "criticism of Hegel's philosophy of Law". Marx scientifically explained the difference between human liberation and political liberation. Part 4th discusses the theoretical and practical significance of the criticism of Hegel's philosophy of law. And to guide China's real society.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：A811

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前3條

1 夏林;;馬克思究竟如何超越黑格爾?——深入理解馬克思主義的“原點問題”[J];現(xiàn)代哲學;2009年01期

2 王東;林鋒;;馬克思哲學創(chuàng)新的重要鋪墊——重新評價《黑格爾法哲學批判》的歷史地位[J];新視野;2006年01期

3 李淑梅;體系化哲學的突破與政治哲學研究方法的轉(zhuǎn)變——馬克思的《黑格爾法哲學批判》再解讀[J];哲學研究;2005年09期

本文編號：1444132