本文選題：社區(qū)服務(wù)中心 + 社區(qū)治理　； 參考：《深圳大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著城市化進(jìn)程的逐步加快,城市的社區(qū)問題和矛盾也越來越多元化,傳統(tǒng)的社區(qū)治理已經(jīng)不能滿足社區(qū)的多元化需求,創(chuàng)新社區(qū)治理體制成為各地社區(qū)建設(shè)的新課題。深圳市在探索社區(qū)治理體制改革方面走在了全國(guó)的前列,結(jié)合黨的十六屆六中全會(huì)提出要建設(shè)宏大的社會(huì)工作人才隊(duì)伍的要求,深圳頒發(fā)了社會(huì)工作“1+7”文件,大力發(fā)展社會(huì)工作,2011年在“政府主導(dǎo),民間推動(dòng)”模式下,建立社區(qū)服務(wù)中心,引入社會(huì)工作參與到社區(qū)治理當(dāng)中來。截止到2016年6月在深圳市建立了668家社區(qū)服務(wù)中心,實(shí)現(xiàn)了全覆蓋的目標(biāo)。并同時(shí)將社區(qū)服務(wù)中心更名為社區(qū)黨群服務(wù)中心,將其納入到社區(qū)黨委領(lǐng)導(dǎo)下,并強(qiáng)調(diào)在參與社區(qū)中突出黨組織的作用,樹立黨的形象。筆者作為一名長(zhǎng)期工作在社區(qū)的一線社工,經(jīng)過這個(gè)轉(zhuǎn)折點(diǎn),引起了筆者對(duì)社區(qū)服務(wù)中心嵌入到社區(qū)治理體系后,對(duì)其角色功能定位及未來發(fā)展的反思。本文通過文獻(xiàn)分析方法對(duì)目前國(guó)內(nèi)研究社會(huì)工作及其機(jī)構(gòu)(NGO)在介入社區(qū)的角色、功能、困境以及現(xiàn)實(shí)路徑進(jìn)行梳理,了解社區(qū)服務(wù)中心在參與社區(qū)治理體系的重要角色。同時(shí)以社區(qū)主義與新自由主義結(jié)合的第三條道路以及“服務(wù)型治理”理論為基礎(chǔ),運(yùn)用實(shí)地觀察法,選取深圳B社區(qū)服務(wù)中心作為個(gè)案進(jìn)行深入研究,分析社區(qū)服務(wù)中心在參與社區(qū)治理的主要內(nèi)容、承擔(dān)的角色和采取的方式、取得的成效、以及其在參與社區(qū)治理過程中面臨的困境和挑戰(zhàn),并對(duì)其現(xiàn)實(shí)出路進(jìn)行了討論。文章指出,要保證社區(qū)服務(wù)中心未來在社區(qū)治理中保持長(zhǎng)效發(fā)展,社區(qū)服務(wù)中心自身和政府雙向都需要作出改變,社區(qū)服務(wù)中心自身要在介入理念、介入策略、介入角度方面保證其專業(yè)性、有效性和不可替代性�；鶎诱鞔_各治理主體間角色,擺正對(duì)服務(wù)中心的認(rèn)知,上級(jí)政府要完善社區(qū)服務(wù)中心招投標(biāo)政策,為社區(qū)服務(wù)中心發(fā)展創(chuàng)造更多的空間。如此,社區(qū)服務(wù)中心才能更好的為創(chuàng)新社區(qū)治理體系做出貢獻(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:With the gradual acceleration of the urbanization process, the problems and contradictions of the urban community are becoming more and more diversified. Traditional community governance can no longer meet the diverse needs of the community. Innovating the community governance system has become a new topic of community construction. Shenzhen has been at the forefront of the whole country in exploring the reform of the community governance system. In line with the request of the sixth Plenary session of the 16th Central Committee of the Party to build a large contingent of social workers, Shenzhen has issued the "17" document on social work. In 2011, under the mode of "government leading, folk pushing", the community service center was established, and social work was introduced into the community governance. By June 2016, 668 community service centers had been set up in Shenzhen, achieving the goal of full coverage. At the same time, the community service center was renamed as the community party group service center, which was brought into the leadership of the community party committee, and emphasized the role of the party organization in the community participation and set up the image of the party. As a first-line social worker working in the community for a long time, after this turning point, the author reflects on the role function orientation and future development of the community service center embedded in the community governance system. In this paper, the role, function, predicament and realistic path of the social work and its organization NGO in the intervention of the community are analyzed by literature analysis, and the important role of the community service center in participating in the community governance system is understood. At the same time, on the basis of the third way of combining communitarianism and neoliberalism and the theory of "service-oriented governance", the author chooses Shenzhen B Community Service Center as a case study. This paper analyzes on the main contents, the roles and the methods taken by the community service center in participating in the community governance, as well as the results achieved, as well as the difficulties and challenges it faces in the process of participating in the community governance, and discusses its practical outlet. The paper points out that in order to ensure the long-term development of community service center in the future, both the community service center itself and the government need to change, and the community service center itself should be involved in the concept and strategy of intervention. The angle of intervention ensures its professionalism, effectiveness and irreplaceable. Grass-roots government should make clear the role of each main body of governance, correct the cognition of service center, and the higher government should perfect the bidding policy of community service center, and create more space for the development of community service center. In this way, the community service center can better contribute to the innovation of community governance system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：深圳大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D669.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 單菲菲;;基于公共價(jià)值視角的城市社區(qū)治理績(jī)效反思[J];蘭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年06期

2 徐宇珊;;服務(wù)型治理:社區(qū)服務(wù)中心參與社區(qū)治理的角色與路徑[J];社會(huì)科學(xué);2016年10期

3 盧瑋靜;趙小平;張叢叢;;中國(guó)城市社區(qū)治理政策的困境、原因與對(duì)策——基于政策分析的視角[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2016年08期

4 顧江霞;;以社區(qū)為本:城市治理的出發(fā)點(diǎn)與落腳點(diǎn)——從H市幸福社區(qū)創(chuàng)建與家庭綜合服務(wù)中心發(fā)展的“社區(qū)性”談起[J];社會(huì)工作與管理;2016年01期

5 馬占亞;;政府主導(dǎo) 多元參與——新加坡社區(qū)治理的經(jīng)驗(yàn)與啟示[J];廣東經(jīng)濟(jì);2015年12期

6 王思斌;;社會(huì)工作機(jī)構(gòu)在社會(huì)治理創(chuàng)新中的網(wǎng)絡(luò)型服務(wù)治理[J];學(xué)海;2015年03期

7 吳曉林;郝麗娜;;“社區(qū)復(fù)興運(yùn)動(dòng)”以來國(guó)外社區(qū)治理研究的理論考察[J];政治學(xué)研究;2015年01期

8 祁志新;牛景隆;劉佳興;孫建華;;社會(huì)治理能力建設(shè)——社區(qū)公共服務(wù)績(jī)效評(píng)估研究綜述[J];價(jià)值工程;2015年02期

9 王思斌;;社會(huì)治理結(jié)構(gòu)的進(jìn)化與社會(huì)工作的服務(wù)型治理[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年06期

10 王思斌;;社會(huì)工作參與社會(huì)治理創(chuàng)新研究[J];社會(huì)建設(shè);2014年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1974360