本文選題：非能動(dòng)系統(tǒng)可靠性 + 設(shè)備可靠性��； 參考：《核科學(xué)與工程》2017年05期

【摘要】：本文首先詳細(xì)解釋了非能動(dòng)系統(tǒng)可靠性概念,分析各種非能動(dòng)系統(tǒng)可靠性評(píng)價(jià)方法的特點(diǎn),對(duì)比各種方法之間的區(qū)別,并指出這些可靠性評(píng)價(jià)方法共同存在的不足:沒(méi)有一種方法可同時(shí)兼顧非能動(dòng)系統(tǒng)設(shè)備可靠性與功能可靠性,不能科學(xué)地整合兩者的可靠性,并且未將非能動(dòng)系統(tǒng)整體可靠性融合進(jìn)概率安全評(píng)價(jià)(PSA)模型;針對(duì)各種方法存在的不足,本文在國(guó)內(nèi)外研究基礎(chǔ)上提出研究問(wèn)題與思路,而且展望了非能動(dòng)系統(tǒng)可靠性評(píng)價(jià)方法未來(lái)的發(fā)展方向。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the concept of the reliability of the passive system is explained in detail, and the characteristics of various methods for evaluating the reliability of the passive system are analyzed, and the differences between the methods are compared. The shortcomings of these reliability evaluation methods are pointed out: none of them can give consideration to both the reliability and the functional reliability of the inactive system equipment, and can not scientifically integrate the reliability of the two methods. The whole reliability of inactive system has not been integrated into the probabilistic safety evaluation model. In view of the shortcomings of various methods, this paper puts forward the research problems and ideas on the basis of domestic and foreign research. The future development direction of reliability evaluation method for inactive system is also prospected.
【作者單位】： 海軍工程大學(xué)核能科學(xué)與工程系;南昌航空大學(xué)材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)院;
【基金】：核反應(yīng)堆系統(tǒng)設(shè)計(jì)技術(shù)國(guó)家重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室基金資助項(xiàng)目(HT-JXYY-02-2014002)
【分類號(hào)】：TM623.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 陳娟;周濤;劉亮;王澤雷;;非能動(dòng)系統(tǒng)可靠性分析方法比較[J];華電技術(shù);2013年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1861305