本文關(guān)鍵詞：火電廠WESP細(xì)微顆粒物脫除特性分析與效率的數(shù)值模擬　出處：《上海電力學(xué)院》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 火電廠 濕式靜電除塵器 除塵效率 數(shù)值模擬

【摘要】：隨著社會(huì)的快速發(fā)展,經(jīng)濟(jì)水平的不斷提升,我國用電負(fù)荷不斷上升,火電廠燃煤所導(dǎo)致的大氣污染隨之加重,特別是近年來頻繁出現(xiàn)的霧霾不斷引起社會(huì)公眾的廣泛關(guān)注。雖然干式靜電除塵器在火電廠的廣泛應(yīng)用大大降低了顆粒物的總排放量,但是其對(duì)PM2.5、PM10等細(xì)微顆粒物的脫除效果并不理想。為滿足國家對(duì)顆粒物排放的新要求,濕式靜電除塵器(WESP)作為新型高效的除塵技術(shù)備受關(guān)注。本文對(duì)裝備有濕式靜電除塵器的典型660MW火電機(jī)組的顆粒物排放進(jìn)行試驗(yàn),對(duì)比了有無配置WESP時(shí)火電廠細(xì)微顆粒物脫除效果,并針對(duì)其實(shí)際運(yùn)行過程中不同煤種、不同負(fù)荷情況時(shí)進(jìn)行顆粒物的特性分析,WESP對(duì)火電廠細(xì)微顆粒物脫除效果顯著,顆粒物排放濃度能夠維持在3mg/m3以下,滿足國家有關(guān)污染物排放標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的要求;WESP的顆粒物脫除效率與機(jī)組負(fù)荷和煤種都有一定的聯(lián)系,WESP除塵效率隨著負(fù)荷與煤種灰分含量的增加而降低;根據(jù)顆粒物排放特性的分析,WESP對(duì)30μm以下的細(xì)微顆粒物有著顯著的脫除效果。通過采用數(shù)值模擬的方法對(duì)濕式靜電除塵器細(xì)微顆粒脫除效率及其影響因素進(jìn)行了研究。針對(duì)660MW機(jī)組WESP采用數(shù)值模擬計(jì)算的方法,構(gòu)建濕式靜電除塵器數(shù)學(xué)模型,探究噴淋水霧、氣流速度、入口濃度、電勢電壓、噴淋水量等因素對(duì)細(xì)微顆粒物脫除效率的影響,得出:噴淋水對(duì)除塵效果的提升比較明顯;WESP除塵效率隨著氣流速度(0.5m/s-3.5m/s)的增大而不斷降低;當(dāng)顆粒濃度(2mg/m3-300mg/m3)不斷增加,除塵效率先隨之增加,當(dāng)大于30mg/m3然后基本保持平穩(wěn);除塵效率隨著電勢電壓(10k V-50kV)的增加而不斷提高;噴淋水量在0.05kg/s的條件下,WESP除塵效率可達(dá)到最高。同時(shí)對(duì)不同負(fù)荷條件下的WESP脫除情況進(jìn)行模擬,結(jié)果與實(shí)際脫除情況對(duì)比,兩者變化規(guī)律基本一致。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of society and the continuous improvement of economic level, the power load of our country is rising, and the air pollution caused by coal-fired power plants has become more and more serious. Especially the frequent appearance of haze in recent years has attracted the attention of the public. Although the wide use of dry electrostatic precipitators in thermal power plants has greatly reduced the total emissions of particulate matter, but its PM2.5. The removal effect of fine particles such as PM10 is not ideal. Wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP), as a new and efficient dust removal technology, has attracted much attention. In this paper, the emission of particulate matter from a typical 660MW thermal power unit equipped with a wet electrostatic precipitator is tested. The removal effect of fine particles in thermal power plant with or without WESP is compared, and the characteristics of particulate matter are analyzed according to different coal types and different loads in the actual operation process. The effect of WESP on the removal of fine particulate matter in thermal power plant is remarkable, and the emission concentration of particulate matter can be maintained below 3 mg / m3, which meets the requirements of the national emission standards for pollutants. The removal efficiency of particulate matter of WESP is related to the unit load and coal type. The dust removal efficiency of WESP decreases with the increase of load and ash content of coal. According to the analysis of particulates emission characteristics. WESP has remarkable effect on removing fine particles below 30 渭 m. The removal efficiency of fine particles of wet electrostatic precipitator (ESP) and its influencing factors are studied by means of numerical simulation. The WESP of 0MW unit is calculated by numerical simulation. The mathematical model of wet electrostatic precipitator was constructed to explore the effects of spray water mist, airflow velocity, inlet concentration, potential voltage, spray water and other factors on the removal efficiency of fine particles. It is concluded that the effect of spray water on dust removal is obvious. The dust removal efficiency of WESP decreases with the increase of gas velocity (0.5 m / s -3.5 m / s). When the particle concentration increased from 2 mg / m 3 to 300 mg / m 3), the dust removal efficiency increased first, and then remained stable when the particle concentration was greater than 30 mg / m 3. The dust removal efficiency increases with the increase of potential voltage (10k V-50kV). The dust removal efficiency can reach the highest under the condition of spraying water at 0.05 kg / s. At the same time, the WESP removal under different load conditions is simulated, and the results are compared with the actual removal situation. The law of change between the two is basically the same.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海電力學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：TM621.73

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 趙鵬;陳勇;蹇浪;;濕式靜電除塵器在火電廠中的應(yīng)用探討[J];能源與環(huán)境;2013年06期

2 時(shí)超林;潘衛(wèi)國;郭瑞堂;金強(qiáng);丁承剛;郭士義;;火電廠濕式靜電除塵器的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀綜述[J];電力與能源;2013年05期

3 翟松森,段軍,鄧成普,雷繼堯,于保生;帶有濕式靜電除塵器的除塵脫硫裝置工業(yè)實(shí)驗(yàn)[J];河北電力技術(shù);2001年03期

4 劉鶴忠;陶秋根;;濕式電除塵器在工程中的應(yīng)用[J];電力勘測設(shè)計(jì);2012年03期

5 呂馨;郭金光;;晶閘管整流變壓裝置在濕式靜電除塵器中的應(yīng)用[J];自動(dòng)化儀表;2013年09期

6 夏云山;吳曉利;;燃?xì)庹羝?lián)合發(fā)電EP附著物的分析及建議[J];科技與企業(yè);2013年20期

7 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 ;浙江南源環(huán)境工程技術(shù)有限公司[A];《電站信息》2013年第06期[C];2013年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 江蓬新　劉爽;浙江德創(chuàng)環(huán)保：濕式靜電除塵器助電企近零排放[N];中國電力報(bào);2014年

2 ;燒結(jié)與球團(tuán)廠的氣體凈化新技術(shù)[N];世界金屬導(dǎo)報(bào);2002年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 盧越琴;濕式靜電除塵器高分子極板特性研究[D];華北電力大學(xué);2015年

2 王沛迪;火電廠WESP細(xì)微顆粒物脫除特性分析與效率的數(shù)值模擬[D];上海電力學(xué)院;2016年

3 孫尊強(qiáng);柔性電極濕式靜電除塵關(guān)鍵技術(shù)工程應(yīng)用研究[D];東南大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1371209