本文選題：批評話語分析 + 意識形態(tài)　； 參考：《福建師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：恐怖主義為實(shí)現(xiàn)其政治目標(biāo)或某項(xiàng)具體要求的主張和行動,對非武裝人員有組織地使用暴力或以暴力相威脅。各國政府和人民強(qiáng)烈譴責(zé)暴力恐怖主義。然而,暴力恐怖事件仍然不斷發(fā)生。2013年5月22日英國倫敦伍爾維奇區(qū)發(fā)生街頭砍殺事件,兩名英國籍男子將一名現(xiàn)役軍人用刀當(dāng)場殺害；2014年3月1日一群暴徒在云南昆明火車站砍殺大量無辜群眾。這兩起事件都引起了世界各國政府和人民的強(qiáng)烈譴責(zé)和關(guān)注,《紐約時報(bào)》也對這兩次事件進(jìn)行了報(bào)道。而《紐約時報(bào)》對這兩起分別發(fā)生在中國和英國的暴力恐怖事件的新聞報(bào)道隱藏著怎樣的意識形態(tài)值得我們的關(guān)注和研究。本研究主要采用批評話語分析的方法,以Fairclough的三維模式作為分析方法,以Halliday的系統(tǒng)功能語法作為分析工具,以《紐約時報(bào)》上關(guān)于昆明事件和伍而維奇事件的新聞報(bào)道為語料。所選語料為《紐約時報(bào)》2013年5月22日至2013年6月22日關(guān)于伍爾維奇事件的新聞報(bào)道和2014年3月1日至2014年4月1日關(guān)于昆明事件的新聞報(bào)道。旨在對比研究《紐約時報(bào)》在關(guān)于這兩起事件的新聞報(bào)道中分別隱藏著怎樣的意識形態(tài),意識形態(tài)是如何在新聞報(bào)道語篇中體現(xiàn)的,以及為什么會有不同的意識形態(tài)。本研究發(fā)現(xiàn)：1)通過對語篇的及物性系統(tǒng)和分類系統(tǒng)的對比分析發(fā)現(xiàn),在《紐約時報(bào)》關(guān)于昆明事件的新聞報(bào)道中,描述了一個專制的、人民沒有言論自由的中國政府形象,并突出強(qiáng)調(diào)維吾爾族所遭遇的不平等以及與漢族和中國政府之間的激烈矛盾。而在《紐約時報(bào)》關(guān)于伍爾維奇事件的新聞報(bào)道中,描述了一個積極處理事件、開放透明的英國政府形象,并突出強(qiáng)調(diào)襲擊者的殘忍,且多與“恐怖主義”、“極端穆斯林”、“伊斯蘭教”等字眼聯(lián)系在一起。2)通過對語篇中消息來源和報(bào)道方式的對比分析發(fā)現(xiàn),在《紐約時報(bào)》關(guān)于昆明事件的新聞報(bào)道中,報(bào)道者多把維吾爾族人民和漢族人民作為消息來源,而在《紐約時報(bào)》關(guān)于伍爾維奇事件的新聞報(bào)道中,報(bào)道者將英國政府作為最主要的消息來源,更多的是站在英國政府的角度,而忽略英國市民對于伍而維奇事件的觀點(diǎn)和看法。3)《紐約時報(bào)》關(guān)于昆明事件和伍爾維奇事件的新聞報(bào)道中的不同意識形態(tài)是由機(jī)構(gòu)和社會、政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)等因素決定的。本研究的理論意義在于為批評話語分析在新聞報(bào)道語篇的應(yīng)用做了有益的嘗試,實(shí)踐意義在于它在一定程度上有助于培養(yǎng)和提高英語學(xué)習(xí)者和英語教學(xué)者的批評閱讀能力和批評語言意識,并對英語學(xué)習(xí)者在閱讀英美報(bào)刊以及英語教學(xué)者在教授英美報(bào)刊課程時具有一定的啟示作用。
[Abstract]:Terrorism, in order to achieve its political objectives or the claims and actions of a specific requirement, systematically uses or threatens to use violence against unarmed persons. Governments and people strongly condemn violent terrorism. However, violent and terrorist incidents continue to occur. On 22 May 2013, street killings occurred in the Woolwich district of London, England, Two British men killed an active soldier with a knife on the spot; on March 1, 2014, a mob slashed and killed a large number of innocent people at the Kunming Railway Station in Yunnan Province. Both incidents have aroused strong condemnation and concern from governments and people around the world, and the New York Times has also reported on them. What ideology the New York Times has hidden in these two violent terrorist incidents in China and Britain is worthy of our attention and study. This study mainly adopts the critical discourse analysis method, taking the three-dimensional pattern of Fairclough as the analytical method, the systematic functional grammar of Halliday as the analytical tool, and the news reports on Kunming and Woolevich events in the New York Times as the corpus. The selected language materials are the New York Times News report on the Woolwich incident from May 22, 2013 to June 22, 2013, and the Kunming incident from March 1, 2014 to April 1, 2014. The purpose of this study is to compare what ideology is hidden in the New York Times' news reports on these two events, how ideology is embodied in news reports, and why there are different ideologies. This study found that: 1) through the comparative analysis of the text and the material and classification systems, it is found that in the New York Times's news report on the Kunming incident, the image of an autocratic Chinese government with no people's freedom of speech is described. The inequality encountered by Uighurs and the fierce contradiction with Han and Chinese government are highlighted. And in the New York Times news report on the Woolwich incident, it describes an active handling of the incident, an open and transparent image of the British government, and highlights the cruelty of the assailants, as well as "terrorism" and "extreme Muslims". "Islam" and other words are linked together. 2) through a comparative analysis of the sources and reporting methods in the text, it is found that in the New York Times news report on the Kunming incident, The Uyghur and Han Chinese are mostly used as sources of information by the reporters, while in the New York Times news report on the Woolwich incident, the British Government is regarded as the main source of information by the reporters. More from the perspective of the British government, ignoring the views and views of the British people on the Woolwich incident.) the different ideologies in the New York Times news reports on the events in Kunming and Woolwich are by the institutions and the society. Political, economic, etc. The theoretical significance of this study is to make a useful attempt for the application of critical discourse analysis in news discourse. The practical significance lies in its contribution to developing and improving the critical reading ability and critical language awareness of English learners and English teachers to a certain extent. It also can enlighten English learners in reading English newspapers and in teaching English newspapers and periodicals.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福建師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：H315

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 陳中竺;批評語言學(xué)述評[J];外語教學(xué)與研究;1995年01期

，

本文編號：1829536