【摘要】：計(jì)算機(jī)和信息服務(wù)屬于技術(shù)密集型產(chǎn)業(yè),能帶動(dòng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的健康發(fā)展。美國(guó)是世界上最發(fā)達(dá)的國(guó)家,對(duì)于計(jì)算機(jī)和信息服務(wù)的發(fā)展有成功的經(jīng)驗(yàn),印度在計(jì)算機(jī)和信息服務(wù)領(lǐng)域也取得了巨大成就。對(duì)比中美、中印計(jì)算機(jī)和信息服務(wù)貿(mào)易的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀和競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力,總結(jié)美印發(fā)展的經(jīng)驗(yàn),可以為我國(guó)計(jì)算機(jī)和信息服務(wù)貿(mào)易的快速發(fā)展提供借鑒。本文分析了三國(guó)計(jì)算機(jī)和信息服務(wù)貿(mào)易發(fā)展的現(xiàn)狀,發(fā)現(xiàn)近年來(lái)我國(guó)計(jì)算機(jī)和信息服務(wù)貿(mào)易有了迅速的發(fā)展,發(fā)展速度甚至超過印度。但就總量來(lái)說,我國(guó)與美印還有很大差距。運(yùn)用灰色關(guān)聯(lián)模型,采用顯示性和分析性指標(biāo)分析了三國(guó)計(jì)算機(jī)和信息服務(wù)貿(mào)易的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力,發(fā)現(xiàn)美國(guó)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力從2005年開始呈現(xiàn)下降的趨勢(shì)。我國(guó)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力排名從2009年開始在波動(dòng)中上升,顯示出強(qiáng)大的發(fā)展?jié)摿?但仍落后于印度。在“鉆石模型”的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合國(guó)際影響因素,采用因子分析法研究影響三國(guó)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的因素,發(fā)現(xiàn)中、美、印計(jì)算機(jī)和信息服務(wù)貿(mào)易競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的影響因素分別是關(guān)聯(lián)產(chǎn)業(yè)、資金支持度;基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施和關(guān)聯(lián)產(chǎn)業(yè)建設(shè)、資本積累、收入、政府教育投入;人才與外包規(guī)模、政府教育投入、開放度。最后,本文根據(jù)實(shí)證分析結(jié)果,同時(shí)借鑒美印發(fā)展的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn),從政府、企業(yè)和社會(huì)三個(gè)方面為我國(guó)計(jì)算機(jī)和信息服務(wù)貿(mào)易的發(fā)展提出了對(duì)策建議。
[Abstract]:Computer and information services belong to technology-intensive industries, which can promote the healthy development of the economy. As the most developed country in the world, the United States has successful experience in the development of computer and information services. India has also made great achievements in the field of computer and information services. Comparing the development status and competitiveness of Sino-US, Sino-Indian computer and information service trade, and summarizing the experience of US-India development, this paper provides a reference for the rapid development of China's computer and information service trade. This paper analyzes the current situation of the development of computer and information service trade in the three countries, and finds that China's computer and information service trade has made a rapid development in recent years, and the development speed is even higher than that of India. But as far as the total amount is concerned, there is still a big gap between China and the United States and India. This paper analyzes the competitiveness of the three countries' computer and information service trade by means of the grey relational model and the display and analytical indexes. It is found that the competitiveness of the United States has shown a downward trend since 2005. China's competitiveness rankings have risen in volatility since 2009, showing strong development potential but still lagging behind India. Based on the "diamond model" and combined with the international influencing factors, the factors affecting the competitiveness of the three countries are studied by means of factor analysis. It is found that the factors affecting the competitiveness of Chinese, American, Indian computer and information service trade are related industries, respectively. Degree of financial support; Infrastructure and related industry construction, capital accumulation, income, government education investment; talent and outsourcing scale, government education investment, openness. Finally, based on the results of empirical analysis and the successful experience of the development of the United States and India, this paper puts forward some suggestions for the development of China's computer and information service trade from three aspects: government, enterprise and society.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F752.68;F49

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張嚴(yán)冰;黃鶯;司文;;印度吸引海外印裔人才回流的措施和成效[J];國(guó)際研究參考;2014年11期

2 黃慧婧;;中國(guó)服務(wù)貿(mào)易影響因素的實(shí)證分析[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2014年20期

3 李曉峰;姚傳高;;中印服務(wù)貿(mào)易競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)比較及影響因素的實(shí)證研究[J];學(xué)術(shù)研究;2014年09期

4 劉宏;蘇杰芹;;中美服務(wù)貿(mào)易國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力對(duì)比研究[J];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2014年04期

5 馬迎晨;;印度高等教育的高投入[J];教育;2014年05期

6 宋加強(qiáng);王強(qiáng);;現(xiàn)代服務(wù)貿(mào)易國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力影響因素研究——基于跨國(guó)面板數(shù)據(jù)[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問題;2014年02期

7 周少芳;謝力健;;中印服務(wù)貿(mào)易發(fā)展的國(guó)際比較與啟示[J];廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年06期

8 王峰;周文帥;;中國(guó)與東盟國(guó)家計(jì)算機(jī)和信息服務(wù)貿(mào)易國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的比較研究[J];亞太經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年06期

9 謝蘭璋;;國(guó)家競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)論對(duì)服務(wù)貿(mào)易的適用性及啟示[J];湖南科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年10期

10 唐未兵;;我國(guó)不同高技術(shù)行業(yè)利用外資質(zhì)量的評(píng)估與比較[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2012年07期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 羅旭;;中國(guó)吸引海外人才政策詳解[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 楊紅;美國(guó)服務(wù)貿(mào)易競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的影響因素研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2015年

2 韓岳峰;美國(guó)服務(wù)貿(mào)易模式特征研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 盧翠;中印服務(wù)貿(mào)易國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力比較研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2015年

2 彭佳;中國(guó)計(jì)算機(jī)與信息服務(wù)貿(mào)易國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力及影響因素研究[D];青島大學(xué);2014年

3 李坤鵬;美國(guó)、印度與中國(guó)人才資源開發(fā)與管理政策比較研究[D];山西師范大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2434581