本文選題：制度創(chuàng)新 + 中俄　； 參考：《吉林大學》2014年博士論文

【摘要】：制度創(chuàng)新與國家的經濟發(fā)展存在著密切的聯(lián)系，有效率的制度可以激發(fā)人們的創(chuàng)造性和積極性，促進社會資源的合理配置和社會財富的持續(xù)增長，并最終推動整個社會的進步。 中國自1949年成立至今，對制度的探索與創(chuàng)新就從沒有停止過，尤其是改革開放的三十多年里，中國通過在制度上的創(chuàng)新所取得的經濟飛躍更是世界矚目。對于中國在經濟上取得的成就，諸多學者持有不同的看法，但毫無疑問的，體制改革中對于制度的不斷創(chuàng)新促進了中國的經濟增長�？墒侵袊洕脑鲩L速度正在逐年減緩，如何能突破經濟發(fā)展瓶頸，并保持經濟的穩(wěn)定快速增長，成為了現(xiàn)階段中國經濟改革的關鍵，而制度上的創(chuàng)新將成為突破這一瓶頸的重要動力。 俄羅斯與中國既是相鄰的大國，又幾乎是在同一時期進行了由計劃經濟制度向市場經濟制度的轉變，中國的經濟制度改革是“漸進式”的，而俄羅斯的經濟制度改革是“激進式”的，雖然中俄兩國的經濟改革模式不盡相同，但最終的制度創(chuàng)新目標均是要建立市場經濟體制。在向市場經濟制度的轉型過程中，兩國均實現(xiàn)了適應本國國情的、具有本國特色的經濟制度上的不斷創(chuàng)新，使得中俄的經濟制度轉型與西方國家不盡相同，中俄兩國之間也存在較多差異。許多經濟評論者認為，中國的經濟制度轉型相較俄羅斯而言是成功的，因為這一過程使中國的經濟飛速增長，但現(xiàn)在下結論還言之過早。俄羅斯在改革之初確實出現(xiàn)了經濟倒退的經濟現(xiàn)象，但這種置之死地而后生的作法最終也使得俄羅斯的經濟起死回生。俄羅斯在“激進式”的制度創(chuàng)新模式下，徹底的推翻了原有經濟制度，重新建立系統(tǒng)完整的經濟制度，為俄羅斯的經濟可持續(xù)發(fā)展奠定了堅實的基礎。對比俄羅斯在經濟制度創(chuàng)新中與中國存在的差異，分析該差異對經濟增長的影響，將成為中國下一步的經濟制度創(chuàng)新的重要借鑒。 本文運用動態(tài)定性和靜態(tài)定量以及實證檢驗的分析方法，通過對中俄兩國經濟績效的歸納總結和比較，全面深入系統(tǒng)的分析了中俄兩國自20世紀50年代以來的經濟制度創(chuàng)新歷程、存在的共性和差異，為中國經濟制度改革的進一步深化提供參考。 本文主要包括以下幾個部分: 第一章為導論。主要闡述全文的寫作背景及選題意義，梳理和總結國內外關于中國和俄羅斯的經濟制度創(chuàng)新的相關文獻和研究成果，提出寫作思路與框架，確定本文的研究方法。 第二章是全文進行比較研究的理論基礎。該部分在準確界定制度創(chuàng)新的含義的基礎上，主要概述了在創(chuàng)新經濟學、新制度經濟學、制度與經濟增長理論中與制度創(chuàng)新研究相關的理論。這些理論對研究中俄經濟制度創(chuàng)新是至關重要的。 第三章和第四章分別對中國和俄羅斯的經濟制度創(chuàng)新歷程和內容及績效進行了歸納和總結，并利用實證檢驗的方法對中俄的經濟制度創(chuàng)新進行分析。第三章是對俄羅斯的經濟制度創(chuàng)新歷程進行了梳理，并將此歷程分為了三個階段去闡述。其中包括對前蘇聯(lián)時期、“休克療法”時期、普京時期的經濟制度創(chuàng)新的總結和分析。并通過對這一時期的經濟績效的系統(tǒng)分析和實證分析，對普京時期的經濟制度創(chuàng)新給予了肯定的評價。第四章是對中國的經濟制度創(chuàng)新內容進行了歸納總結，將中國的經濟制度創(chuàng)新歷程分為了兩個階段，即1949年-1979年的計劃經濟時期和1979年至今的市場經濟時期。對計劃經濟時期的經濟制度創(chuàng)新進行了總體的歸納和總結并結合該時期的經濟績效對經濟制度創(chuàng)新進行評價。對市場經濟時期的分析是將該時期進行的不同領域的有代表性的創(chuàng)新經濟制度進行分類歸納總結的，對這段時期中國的經濟制度創(chuàng)新進行了系統(tǒng)的梳理，并運用實證檢驗的方式分析了中國經濟制度創(chuàng)新對經濟增長產生的影響，，為中俄經濟制度創(chuàng)新的比較研究提供了事實依據(jù)。 第五章為全文的核心內容，是對中國和俄羅斯的經濟制度創(chuàng)新的比較分析。該部分解析了中俄制度創(chuàng)新比較分析的價值，強調了對中俄兩國進行經濟制度創(chuàng)新比較的重要性。從多角度對中俄的經濟制度創(chuàng)新進行比較研究，其中包括對中俄經濟制度創(chuàng)新模式的比較、對中俄私有化制度創(chuàng)新和分稅制創(chuàng)新的比較、對中俄在經濟制度創(chuàng)新中取得的經濟績效的比較。 第六章在可持續(xù)發(fā)展視域下對中俄經濟制度創(chuàng)新存在的共性與差異及存在的問題進行分析總結。 第七章是對全文的總結和對未來的展望。
[Abstract]:There is a close relationship between institutional innovation and the economic development of the country. An efficient system can stimulate people's creativity and enthusiasm, promote the rational allocation of social resources and the sustained growth of social wealth, and ultimately promote the progress of the whole society.
Since the founding of China in 1949, the exploration and innovation of the system has never stopped, especially in the more than 30 years of reform and opening up, China has made more and more attention in the world through the innovation of the system. Many scholars hold different views on the achievements of China in the economy, but there is no doubt that the system reform is unquestionable. The continuous innovation of the system has promoted the economic growth of China. However, the growth rate of China's economy is slowing down year by year. How to break through the bottleneck of economic development and maintain the stable and rapid economic growth has become the key to the reform of China's economy at the present stage, and the innovation of the system will become an important driving force for breaking this bottleneck.
Russia and China are not only neighboring countries, but also the transformation from planned economy to market economy in the same period. The reform of China's economic system is "progressive", and the reform of Russia's economic system is "radical". Although the economic reform mode of the two countries of China and Russia is different, the final system is not the same. In the process of transforming to the market economy system, both countries have realized the continuous innovation in the economic system with its own national characteristics, making the economic system transformation between China and Russia different from that of the western countries, and there are many differences between China and Russia. Critics argue that the transformation of China's economic system is more successful than Russia's, because this process has made China's economy growing fast, but it is too early to conclude. Russia has indeed appeared economic recession at the beginning of the reform, but the dead and afterbirth practices eventually made the Russian economy. In the "radical" system innovation model, Russia thoroughly overthrew the original economic system and established a complete system of economic system, laid a solid foundation for the sustainable development of Russia's economy. The impact will become an important reference for China's next economic system innovation.
By using the dynamic qualitative and static quantitative and empirical analysis methods, this paper makes a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the economic system innovation process of China and Russia since 1950s, and makes a thorough and systematic analysis of the economic system innovation process of China and Russia, which has made a thorough and systematic analysis of the economic system innovation in China and Russia since 1950s. For reference.
This article mainly includes the following parts:
The first chapter is the introduction. It mainly expounds the writing background and the significance of the topic, combs and summarizes the relevant literature and research achievements on the economic system innovation of China and Russia, puts forward the thinking and framework of writing, and determines the research methods of this article.
The second chapter is the theoretical basis for the comparative study of the full text. On the basis of defining the meaning of the system innovation, this part mainly outlines the theories related to the research of institutional innovation in the innovation economics, the new institutional economics, the system and the economic growth theory. These theories are very important to the research of the economic system innovation in China and Russia.
The third chapter and the fourth chapter respectively summarize and summarize the economic system innovation process, content and performance of China and Russia, and analyze the economic system innovation of China and Russia by the method of empirical test. The third chapter is to sort out the process of Russian economic system innovation and divide the course into three stages. It includes the summary and analysis of the economic system innovation during the period of shock therapy in the former Soviet Union, the period of shock therapy and the Putin period. Through the systematic and empirical analysis of the economic performance in this period, the economic system innovation in the period of Putin was affirmed. The fourth chapter was the innovation of the economic system in China. The process of economic system innovation in China is divided into two stages, namely, the planned economic period of -1979 in 1949 and the period of market economy from 1979 to the present. The economic system innovation in the period of planned economy is summarized and summarized, and the economic system innovation is evaluated in combination with the economic performance in this period. The analysis of the period of the market economy is the classification and summary of the representative innovative economic system in different areas of the period. It systematically combs the innovation of China's economic system in this period, and analyzes the influence of China's economic system innovation on economic growth by the way of empirical test, which is China Russia. A comparative study of economic institutional innovation provides a factual basis.
The fifth chapter is the core content of the full text, which is the comparative analysis of the economic system innovation between China and Russia. This part analyses the value of the comparative analysis of China Russia system innovation and emphasizes the importance of the comparison of the economic system innovation between China and Russia. The comparison of the innovation mode of Russian economic system, the comparison of the innovation of the privatization system between China and Russia and the innovation of the tax sharing system, compares the economic performance of China and Russia in the innovation of the economic system.
The sixth chapter analyzes and summarizes the similarities and differences of the economic system innovation between China and Russia from the perspective of sustainable development.
The seventh chapter is the summary of the full text and the outlook for the future.

【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F120;F151.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 藍虹;產權制度創(chuàng)新、技術創(chuàng)新與可持續(xù)發(fā)展[J];北京師范大學學報(社會科學版);2004年01期

2 李波;新劍橋學派的經濟增長模型[J];北京理工大學學報(社會科學版);2001年01期

3 金玉國;宏觀制度變遷對轉型時期中國經濟增長的貢獻[J];財經科學;2001年02期

4 劉國光;促進消費需求提高消費率是擴大內需的必由之路[J];財貿經濟;2002年05期

5 袁芳;;錦標賽、內生性制度創(chuàng)新供給與地區(qū)博弈——以各地物流園區(qū)布局為例[J];財貿研究;2006年04期

6 傅志華;俄羅斯個人所得稅制改革考察[J];財政研究;2003年04期

7 唐朱昌;俄羅斯國有企業(yè)產權制度變遷的績效分析[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2003年05期

8 王佳慧;;俄羅斯稅權劃分法律制度評介——兼談對我國分稅制改革的啟示[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2009年04期

9 魏建國;;俄羅斯市場經濟轉型困境的法治視角解讀[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2011年06期

10 劉婷婷;張慧君;;轉型深化進程中的國家治理模式重構[J];俄羅斯研究;2008年03期

相關博士學位論文 前3條

1 謝琦;中國經濟增長模式轉型的結構分析[D];西北大學;2009年

2 林勇;轉型經濟可持續(xù)發(fā)展論[D];重慶大學;2009年

3 任常軍;金融危機背景下我國稅制改革研究[D];華中科技大學;2009年

本文編號：1780538