城市化包容性發(fā)展的綜合測(cè)度及驅(qū)動(dòng)因素研究
[Abstract]:In this paper, 30 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities above prefecture level in mainland China are selected as the object of study, and the inclusive development level of urbanization from 2004 to 2013 is comprehensively measured, and its driving factors are analyzed empirically. The results show that: (1) during the last 10 years, the level of inclusive development of urbanization in China is generally low, and the trend of "M" type development is present, and there is no significant change in the initial and final years. Among them, the eastern and northeast regions showed a downward trend, the central region remained basically flat, and the western region increased somewhat. However, the eastern region is obviously higher than the other three regions. (2) all the provinces and cities in the highly inclusive development type of urbanization are located in the eastern region, especially in Guangdong; The provinces, cities and regions in the low inclusive development type and non-inclusive development type basically belong to the central and western regions and northeast regions, and Guangxi has the most obvious performance. (3) for different regional types, the drivers of inclusive development of urbanization are different. The level of industrial structure, government public regulation, the level of urban spatial agglomeration, the level of marketization and the level of urban infrastructure are the driving factors of inclusive development of urbanization in China. For the four plates, the driving factors of the inclusive development of urbanization in the eastern region are the level of industrial structure, the level of marketization and the level of urban infrastructure, and the level of marketization and the level of urban infrastructure in the central region. The level of industrial structure, the intensity of government public regulation, the level of urban spatial agglomeration and the level of urban infrastructure in the western region, and the level of industrial structure, governmental public regulation and marketization in Northeast China are the levels of industrial structure, government public regulation, and urban infrastructure. On this basis, the corresponding policy inspiration is put forward.
【作者單位】: 東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)公共管理學(xué)院;
【基金】:國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“新型城鎮(zhèn)化的包容性發(fā)展及其空間效應(yīng)研究”(14BJY052) 國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“新型城鎮(zhèn)化的空間效應(yīng)與區(qū)域政策工具組合創(chuàng)新”(41571121) 遼寧省教育廳科學(xué)研究一般項(xiàng)目“遼寧省城市化的轉(zhuǎn)型發(fā)展及路徑優(yōu)化研究”(LN2016YB027)
【分類號(hào)】:F299.2
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條
1 金萬富;湯曉華;陳春橋;;中國(guó)東部沿海地區(qū)碳強(qiáng)度對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)水平響應(yīng)度省際差異[J];云南地理環(huán)境研究;2011年03期
2 嘉蓉梅;;產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)水平測(cè)度模型及對(duì)地區(qū)的實(shí)證考察[J];云南社會(huì)科學(xué);2012年04期
3 田秉濤;王曉文;李娟;;基于SSM的云南省產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)水平測(cè)評(píng)[J];亞熱帶資源與環(huán)境學(xué)報(bào);2013年01期
4 鄭元?jiǎng)P;;淺析我國(guó)知識(shí)型失業(yè)的成因與治理對(duì)策[J];華東經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2007年04期
5 張金艷;楊永聰;;瑞典碳稅對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)水平影響的實(shí)證分析[J];戰(zhàn)略決策研究;2011年02期
6 塔娜;王素娟;;增長(zhǎng)極發(fā)展 點(diǎn)軸布局和網(wǎng)絡(luò)布局理論及我國(guó)的選擇[J];赤峰教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期
7 方大春;;安徽地級(jí)市承接外商直接投資競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力實(shí)證分析[J];安慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年03期
8 ;[J];;年期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 劉彩蘭;服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)外開放度對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)水平的影響[D];暨南大學(xué);2011年
,本文編號(hào):2433284
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/hongguanjingjilunwen/2433284.html