本文選題：服務業(yè)　切入點：投資環(huán)境　出處：《山西師范大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：中國經(jīng)濟發(fā)展進入新常態(tài)，經(jīng)濟轉型升級正處在重要歷史拐點，在“三期”疊加、經(jīng)濟下行壓力較大的復雜形勢，推進服務業(yè)主導的轉型與改革尤為重要。在加快發(fā)展服務業(yè)方面，國家以及各個地區(qū)無不盡心竭力出臺政策措施引導服務業(yè)發(fā)展、吸引外來服務業(yè)資本的入駐，而服務業(yè)投資環(huán)境的優(yōu)劣決定引資數(shù)量與質量。 本文在回顧已有學者對于服務業(yè)投資環(huán)境的相關研究的基礎上，選出影響服務業(yè)投資環(huán)境評價的相關因素，運用計量模型對因素進行相關性分析，篩選出對服務業(yè)投資環(huán)境影響較大的因素，構建了服務業(yè)投資環(huán)境評價指標體系，指標體系由地區(qū)人均國民生產總值、第二產業(yè)GDP占比、服務行業(yè)勞動力成本、人力資本存量、城市化水平、市場化水平、法治化水平以及基礎設施構成。運用構建的服務業(yè)投資環(huán)境評價指標體系，分別從省級層面與地市級層面測算了各地服務業(yè)投資環(huán)境現(xiàn)狀及排名。從省級層面，通過主成分分析法實際測算了31省、自治區(qū)與直轄市指標體系內各因素對于服務業(yè)投資環(huán)境的貢獻度，各因素按照貢獻度由大到小依次為：市場化水平、城市化水平、人均國民生產總值、法治化水平、服務業(yè)勞動力成本、基礎設施狀況、第二產業(yè)的GDP占比；在此基礎上，對各省的服務業(yè)投資環(huán)境進行了量化打分、排名，得出各省服務業(yè)投資環(huán)境在國內的相對位置。利用相同的方法，從地級市層面測算了283個地級市和4個盟旗評價指標體系內各個影響因素對于服務投資環(huán)境的貢獻度，各因素貢獻度由大到小依次為：人均國民生產總值、城市化水平、法治化水平、基礎設施狀況、第二產業(yè)GDP占比、服務業(yè)勞動力成本、人力資本存量、市場化水平；通過各個因素的系數(shù)矩陣對于地市級的城市服務業(yè)投資環(huán)境進行了量化打分、排名，得出各個地級市服務業(yè)投資環(huán)境的相對位置。 通過對比后發(fā)現(xiàn)，基于同一指標體系，內部各個因素對于省級、地市級服務業(yè)投資環(huán)境的貢獻度顯著不同；一個省域自身服務業(yè)投資環(huán)境如何，省內的地級市服務業(yè)投資環(huán)境都具有較大的差異。由此也可知，省級層面出臺優(yōu)化服務業(yè)投資環(huán)境的相關政策對于地級市層面來說不具有較強的針對性；各個地市級在完善服務業(yè)投資環(huán)境時應因地制宜，清晰的認知地區(qū)服務業(yè)投資環(huán)境的現(xiàn)狀，，同時首先優(yōu)化對投資環(huán)境改善貢獻度較大的因素，繼而優(yōu)化貢獻度次之的因素，不應本末倒置，貢獻度較大的因素無法得到較好的優(yōu)化情況下，將不具備對服務業(yè)招商引資的條件，所出臺的相關政策的效果將不理想。
[Abstract]:China's economic development has entered the new normal and the economic transformation and upgrading is at an important historical inflection point. In the complicated situation of "three periods" superposition and economic downward pressure, it is particularly important to push forward the service industry-led transformation and reform.In the aspect of speeding up the development of service industry, the country and every region try their best to introduce policies and measures to guide the development of service industry and attract the capital of foreign service industry, and the quality and quantity of investment environment of service industry determine the quantity and quality of investment.On the basis of reviewing the relevant research on the investment environment of the service industry, this paper selects the relevant factors that affect the investment environment of the service industry, and uses the econometric model to analyze the correlation of the factors.The factors that influence the investment environment of service industry are screened out, and the evaluation index system of investment environment of service industry is constructed. The index system consists of the per capita gross national product of the region, the proportion of GDP in the secondary industry, the labor cost of the service industry and the stock of human capital.Urbanization level, marketization level, rule of law level and infrastructure constitution.By using the evaluation index system of investment environment of service industry, the present situation and ranking of investment environment of service industry are calculated from provincial level and prefectural level.At the provincial level, through principal component analysis, the contribution of all factors in the index system of 31 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government to the investment environment of the service industry is actually calculated.Urbanization level, per capita gross national product (GNP), rule of law level, labor cost of service industry, infrastructure condition, GDP ratio of secondary industry, on the basis of which, the investment environment of service industry in each province is quantified and ranked.The relative position of investment environment of service industry in each province is obtained.Using the same method, this paper calculates the contribution of every factor in the evaluation index system of 283 prefecture-level cities and four league flags to the service investment environment from the level of prefectural level to the city level. The contribution of each factor is from big to small as follows: per capita gross national product (GNP).The urbanization level, the rule of law level, the infrastructure condition, the second industry GDP proportion, the service industry labor cost, the human capital stock, the marketization level;Through the coefficient matrix of each factor, the investment environment of the city service industry is quantified and ranked, and the relative position of the investment environment of the city service industry is obtained.Through comparison, it is found that, based on the same index system, the contribution of internal factors to the investment environment of service industry at provincial and municipal levels is significantly different.The investment environment of service industry in prefectural cities has great difference.From this, we can see that the relevant policies to optimize the investment environment of the service industry at the provincial level do not have strong pertinence for the prefectural level and the city level should take measures according to the local conditions when perfecting the investment environment of the service industry.To clearly understand the current situation of the investment environment in the service industry in the region, at the same time, to optimize the factors that contribute to the improvement of the investment environment, and then to optimize the contribution to the next, should not put the cart before the horse.If the factors with larger contribution degree can not get better optimization, it will not have the conditions to attract investment to the service industry, and the effect of the relevant policies will not be ideal.
【學位授予單位】：山西師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：F719

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 范紅忠;市場規(guī)模、地區(qū)投資吸引力與地區(qū)經(jīng)濟差異的邏輯解釋及實證[J];財經(jīng)研究;2004年11期

2 張誠;趙奇?zhèn)?;中國服務業(yè)外商直接投資的區(qū)位選擇因素分析[J];財經(jīng)研究;2008年12期

3 倪鵬飛;中國城市服務業(yè)發(fā)展:假設與驗證[J];財貿經(jīng)濟;2004年07期

4 唐保慶;孫少勤;楊繼軍;;什么影響了生產者服務業(yè)FDI的區(qū)域分布——來自美國的經(jīng)驗證據(jù):1985-2006[J];財貿經(jīng)濟;2011年05期

5 陳銀娥;魏君英;;中國服務業(yè)發(fā)展影響因素的實證分析[J];中國地質大學學報(社會科學版);2007年05期

6 文余源;;FDI理論與區(qū)位決策研究述評[J];地理科學進展;2008年02期

7 賀燦飛;肖曉俊;;跨國公司功能區(qū)位實證研究[J];地理學報;2011年12期

8 程連生;中國城市投資環(huán)境分析[J];地理學報;1995年03期

9 劉洪明;中國各地區(qū)投資環(huán)境的對比分析[J];地域研究與開發(fā);1996年02期

10 郭文杰;;中國城市化與服務業(yè)發(fā)展的動態(tài)計量分析:1978～2004[J];河北經(jīng)貿大學學報;2007年03期

本文編號：1728189