發(fā)布時間：2018-01-09 06:35

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：我國應(yīng)對“雙反”調(diào)查的問題與對策研究　出處：《東北財經(jīng)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： “雙反”調(diào)查 反傾銷 反補貼 應(yīng)對措施

【摘要】：進入新世紀以來,我國的對外貿(mào)易取得了飛速的發(fā)展。然而,隨著全球經(jīng)濟一體化進程的加快和我國融入世界經(jīng)濟程度的不斷加深,我國的對外貿(mào)易也面臨著新的挑戰(zhàn)。2008年爆發(fā)的全球性金融危機使得各國市場需求下降,經(jīng)濟停滯不前,甚至出現(xiàn)倒退,給國際貿(mào)易的發(fā)展籠罩上了一層陰霾。在世界經(jīng)濟不穩(wěn)定性增加的背景下,貿(mào)易保護主義開始抬頭,各國政府為了保護國內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)免受損害,紛紛采用貿(mào)易救濟措施。在這一過程中,“雙反”措施因其影響大、應(yīng)訴難等特點而受到各國的青睞。作為全球性的經(jīng)濟和貿(mào)易大國,我國多年來對主要貿(mào)易國都保持著高額的貿(mào)易順差,自然成為了各國進行“雙反”措施的重點目標。截止目前己經(jīng)有美國、加拿大、澳大利亞、歐盟等多個國家和地區(qū)針對我國的鋼鐵制品、化工原料、建筑建材、機械機電等多種產(chǎn)品發(fā)起了七十多起“雙反”調(diào)查,其中絕大部分都實施了“雙反”措施。頻繁的“雙反”調(diào)查對我國造成了多方面的巨大影響。 因此,在當前不斷變化的國際經(jīng)濟新形勢下,對“雙反”問題的集中分析和研究顯得尤為重要�；谶@一特定的現(xiàn)實背景,本文通過定性分析法和經(jīng)驗分析法對我國當前遭受“雙反”調(diào)查的現(xiàn)狀、原因和影響進行系統(tǒng)、深入地分析,并嘗試為我國應(yīng)對“雙反”調(diào)查提出科學(xué)、合理的政策建議。 全文共分為七個部分： 第一部分介紹了本文的研究背景和研究意義,分析了國內(nèi)外對反傾銷、反補貼以及“雙反”問題的研究現(xiàn)狀,最后說明了本文的研究思路和論文結(jié)構(gòu)并指出了研究的創(chuàng)新點與不足之處。 第二部分詳細闡述了本文的研究對象——“雙反”調(diào)查,包括“雙反”調(diào)查的定義和特點、法律依據(jù)以及“雙反”調(diào)查在實踐中的一般程序,為論文后面的進一步研究奠定了理論基礎(chǔ)。 第三部分分析了我國遭受“雙反”調(diào)查的現(xiàn)狀。通過對近十年來我國所遭受“雙反”調(diào)查的現(xiàn)狀研究發(fā)現(xiàn),我國遭受的“雙反”調(diào)查幾乎全部來自美、加、澳、歐這四個發(fā)達經(jīng)濟體,而且呈現(xiàn)出起訴國家和涉案產(chǎn)品相對集中,“雙反”關(guān)稅的懲罰程度不同以及“雙反”調(diào)查的應(yīng)對難度更大的特點。 第四部分剖析了我國遭受“雙反”調(diào)查的原因。本文認為我國頻繁遭受“雙反”調(diào)查的內(nèi)部原因主要是我國存在企業(yè)傾銷行為和政府補貼政策,出口產(chǎn)品的目標輸出市場相對集中,放棄了發(fā)展中國家特殊和差別待遇以及大部分企業(yè)消極應(yīng)訴或者應(yīng)訴不力；外部原因主要是由巨額貿(mào)易順差,全球性金融危機,進口國修改國內(nèi)反補貼法以及“雙反”調(diào)查本身所具有的特點所致。 第五部分分析了“雙反”調(diào)查對我國造成的影響。本文研究認為“雙反”調(diào)查會加重我國政府和企業(yè)的負擔,削弱我國出口產(chǎn)品的競爭力,阻礙我國宏觀調(diào)控政策實施并可能引發(fā)產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈連鎖效應(yīng)和羊群效應(yīng)。 第六部分是在前文研究的基礎(chǔ)上,從政府、行業(yè)協(xié)會和企業(yè)三個層面提出了我國應(yīng)對“雙反”調(diào)查的政策建議：政府應(yīng)完善我國應(yīng)對貿(mào)易救濟調(diào)查的相關(guān)制度,規(guī)范我國的補貼政策和措施,充分運用WTO爭端解決機制；行業(yè)協(xié)會應(yīng)完善“四體聯(lián)動”的應(yīng)對機制,成立貿(mào)易救濟調(diào)查應(yīng)訴基金,培養(yǎng)“雙反”調(diào)查應(yīng)訴人才；企業(yè)應(yīng)提前準備并且積極應(yīng)訴,優(yōu)化出口產(chǎn)品競爭策略,充分運用司法審查制度。 第七部分對全文的內(nèi)容進行了總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:Since entering the new century, China's foreign trade has made rapid development. However, with the acceleration of global economic integration and China's integration of the world economy is deepening, China's foreign trade is facing new challenges.2008 years of the outbreak of the global financial crisis makes the decline in market demand, the economy is stagnant, even back to the development of international trade, was shrouded in a haze. The increase in world economic instability under the background of trade protectionism began to rise, governments in order to protect the domestic industry from damage, have adopted the trade remedy measures. In this process, the "double reverse" measures because of its great influence, the characteristics of the respondent difficult and popular in many countries. As a big country of global economy and trade, China over the years of the major trading countries have maintained high trade surplus countries in nature "The key target of anti-dumping and countervailing measures. Up to now has been the United States, Canada, Australia, the European Union and other countries and regions in China's iron and steel products, chemical raw materials, building materials, machinery and other mechanical and electrical products launched the more than 70 double reverse survey, most of which are in the implementation of the" double counter measures. "Frequent" double reverse survey in China has caused tremendous influence in many aspects.
Therefore, in the new international economic situation and the current changing, focus on analysis and research of the "double reverse" problem is particularly important. Based on the reality of this specific background, this paper through the qualitative analysis method and Empirical Analysis on China's current situation of "double reverse" by the investigation, the system of cause and effect, an in-depth analysis, and try to put forward science for our country to deal with the "double reverse survey, reasonable policy recommendations.
The full text is divided into seven parts:
The first part introduces the background and significance of the research, analyzes the research status quo of anti-dumping, countervailing and dual reverse at home and abroad, and finally illustrates the research ideas and structure of this paper, and points out the innovation and shortcomings of the research.
The second part elaborates the research object of this paper -- "double reverse" survey, including the definition and characteristics of "double reverse" survey, the legal basis and the general procedure of "double reverse" survey in practice, which laid a theoretical foundation for further research.
The third part analyzes the subject of investigations of the status quo. Based on the recent ten years in our country suffered the current research on "double reverse survey found that China suffered a" double reverse survey "almost all from the United States, Australia, Europe, the four developed economies, but also presents Sue countries and products involved are relatively concentrated, the" double reverse "tariff as well as the different degree of punishment" double reverse "survey response is more difficult.
The fourth part analyzes the reasons of China suffered a double reverse investigation. This paper argues that China suffers from frequent "internal causes double reverse survey of China's major enterprises exist dumping behavior and government subsidy policy, target output market exports is relatively concentrated in developing countries, to give up the special and differential treatment, the majority of enterprises negative the respondent or respondent ineffective; external reason is mainly caused by the huge trade surplus, the global financial crisis, the importing country to amend the domestic anti subsidy law and the" double reverse "survey by itself with the characteristics.
The fifth part analyzes the influence of "double reverse" caused by the investigation to China. This study suggests that the "double reverse" survey will increase the burden of our government and enterprises, weaken the competitiveness of our export products, hindering the implementation of macroeconomic policies and may lead to the industrial chain chain effect and herding effect.
The sixth part is on the basis of previous studies, from the government, industry association and enterprise three levels put forward China to deal with anti-dumping and countervailing policy recommendations: the government should improve the system of our country to deal with trade remedy investigations, and measures to regulate the subsidy policy of our country, make full use of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism; industry the association should improve the coping mechanism of four linkage ", the establishment of trade remedy investigation to fund training" double reverse survey respondent personnel; enterprises should prepare in advance and actively responding, optimize the export product competitive strategy, make full use of judicial review system.
The seventh part summarizes the content of the full text.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F752.02

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 欒信杰;;兩條腿走三步——美國對華反補貼態(tài)勢分析[J];理論參考;2009年03期

2 楊悅;何海燕;王憲良;;進口反傾銷行為對產(chǎn)業(yè)價格指數(shù)影響的實證研究——以鋼鐵行業(yè)為例[J];財貿(mào)研究;2007年06期

3 邢艷青;規(guī)避國際反補貼的會計途徑[J];對外經(jīng)貿(mào)財會;2005年12期

4 曹子瑛;孫艷;;國外對華反補貼之研究與對策[J];當代經(jīng)理人;2005年06期

5 朱雅妮;;美國反補貼法的新趨勢——以對“非市場經(jīng)濟國家”的逐步適用性為視角[J];湖南社會科學(xué);2008年05期

6 茍大凱;;美國對華實施“雙反”之違法性分析[J];法學(xué);2010年03期

7 姚慶超;辛樹雄;;WTO體制下反補貼與反傾銷比較及同時適用[J];法制與社會;2010年03期

8 劉林靜;;從銅版紙案看美國對非市場經(jīng)濟國家適用反補貼的新趨勢[J];法制與社會;2011年11期

9 姜世波;;中國對WTO爭端解決之態(tài)度演變及問題分析[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2011年08期

10 程大為;WTO反傾銷措施和中國反傾銷應(yīng)訴[J];國際經(jīng)濟合作;2000年11期

，

本文編號：1400382