本文選題：經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任審計 + 經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任�。� 參考：《吉林財經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：時代在進(jìn)步,經(jīng)濟(jì)在發(fā)展,各企業(yè)面臨的經(jīng)濟(jì)壞境也越來越復(fù)雜多樣,相應(yīng)的對于國企領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部的經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任審計也變得復(fù)雜起來。領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任審計可作為衡量領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部任職期間履職狀況的檢測標(biāo)準(zhǔn)之一,也可作為一種手段約束高管行為。并且,經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任審計對完善領(lǐng)導(dǎo)管理機(jī)制、規(guī)范領(lǐng)導(dǎo)行為,加強(qiáng)廉政建設(shè)、評價經(jīng)營業(yè)績、促進(jìn)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部遵守財經(jīng)法規(guī)法紀(jì)也有重大作用。雖然開展經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任審計有諸多好處,可是我國目前對于經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任審計理論的研究很不完善,缺乏一個可完善的理論體系。目前,現(xiàn)階段的經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任審計還是參照財務(wù)收支審計,主要以報表審計為基礎(chǔ)確定審計方案,忽略了審計業(yè)務(wù)的變化和經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境的復(fù)雜性。因此,就目前的狀況而言,經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任審計需要在理論方面不斷完善,在制度保障方面盡快法制化,并且在實(shí)踐過程中不斷規(guī)范。本文以HK物流公司原董事長汪某的經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任審計案例為切入點(diǎn),闡述經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任審計的相關(guān)問題。在其母公司W(wǎng)J物流集團(tuán)有限公司集團(tuán)開展審計活動中,對HK原董事長汪某經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任審計期間發(fā)現(xiàn)HK物流公司存在重大審計風(fēng)險,最終查明W在任職期濫用公司權(quán)利,向母公司報告虛假財務(wù),造成投資者重大損失。經(jīng)過對案例的剖析,從中發(fā)現(xiàn),經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任審計與他審計不同,特別是在審計客體,審計側(cè)重點(diǎn)方面。具體來講,經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任審計的客體是以“人”,而其他審計更多的關(guān)注報表數(shù)據(jù)的真實(shí)性、合法性以及準(zhǔn)確性。經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任審計在規(guī)范高層管理人員經(jīng)濟(jì)行為方面起到重大作用,但是,在經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任審計理論并不完善和執(zhí)行并不規(guī)范的情況下,不能很好的抑制腐敗,但我們可以在審計過程中適時應(yīng)變的改進(jìn)審查方法以提高審計質(zhì)量,為反腐提供證據(jù)。
[Abstract]:With the progress of the times and the development of the economy, the economic bad situation faced by the enterprises is becoming more and more complicated, and the corresponding audit of the economic responsibility of the leading cadres of the state-owned enterprises has become more and more complicated. The economic responsibility audit of leaders can be used as one of the test standards to measure the performance of leading cadres during their tenure, and it can also be used as a means to restrain executive behavior. Moreover, the audit of economic responsibility plays an important role in perfecting the leadership management mechanism, standardizing the leadership behavior, strengthening the construction of a clean government, evaluating the performance of the management, and promoting the leading cadres to abide by the laws and regulations of finance and economics. Although there are many advantages in carrying out economic responsibility audit, the current research on the theory of economic responsibility audit in our country is very imperfect and lacks a perfect theoretical system. At present, the audit of economic responsibility still refers to the audit of financial revenue and expenditure, mainly based on the audit of statements, ignoring the changes of audit business and the complexity of economic environment. Therefore, as far as the present situation is concerned, the audit of economic responsibility needs to be perfected in theory, legalized as soon as possible in the aspect of system guarantee, and regulated continuously in the process of practice. Based on the economic responsibility audit case of Wang Mou, the former chairman of HK Logistics Company, this paper expounds the related problems of economic responsibility audit. In the audit activities carried out by WJ Logistics Group Co., Ltd. of its parent company, during the audit of Wang Mou, the former chairman of HK, it was found that there was a major audit risk in the HK logistics company, and finally it was found that W abused the company's rights during his term of office. False financial reporting to the parent company, resulting in significant losses to investors. Through the analysis of the case, it is found that the audit of economic responsibility is different from that of his, especially in the object of audit and the emphasis of audit. Specifically, the object of economic responsibility audit is "person", while other audits pay more attention to the authenticity, legitimacy and accuracy of report data. The audit of economic responsibility plays an important role in standardizing the economic behavior of senior management. However, when the theory of economic responsibility audit is not perfect and the implementation is not standardized, it can not restrain corruption very well. But we can improve the audit method to improve audit quality and provide evidence for anti-corruption.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F239.47;F259.23

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張憶耕;李靜濤;黃瀅;王德民;;中紀(jì)委“打虎”八十年[J];決策與信息;2014年03期

2 同廣明;;領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任審計評價指標(biāo)探析[J];現(xiàn)代審計與經(jīng)濟(jì);2013年06期

3 廖麗明;;對領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部離任審計存在的問題與對策思考[J];經(jīng)營管理者;2013年24期

4 許霞;;淺談行政事業(yè)單位的經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任審計方法與內(nèi)容[J];中國投資;2013年S2期

5 周榮青;;黨政領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任同步審計模式研究[J];審計研究;2012年04期

6 于邁;談華;;經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任審計評價體系構(gòu)建研究[J];審計月刊;2012年07期

7 韋瑩瑩;;政府治理視角下的國家審計[J];中國城市經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年01期

8 田慶偉;;談領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部任期經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任審計[J];科技信息(科學(xué)教研);2007年25期

9 聶振林;;淺談領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部離任經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任審計的現(xiàn)狀及對策[J];內(nèi)蒙古科技與經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年11期

10 張麗杰;;淺談領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部任期經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任審計[J];科技資訊;2006年36期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 吳昱;地市級黨政領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任審計研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1780058