發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-05-12 12:25

【摘要】：教科書作為中小學(xué)課程發(fā)展的重要組成部分,在中小學(xué)教育教學(xué)中有著舉足輕重的作用�！镀胀ǜ咧袛�(shù)學(xué)課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)(實(shí)驗(yàn)稿)》實(shí)施以來,全國高中數(shù)學(xué)教科書共有6個(gè)版本,因此有必要對不同版本的教科書進(jìn)行詳盡的比較,這不僅對一線教師的教育教學(xué)有實(shí)際意義,對教科書的編寫及相關(guān)內(nèi)容的完善都有著重要的意義。本文采用文獻(xiàn)法、內(nèi)容分析法和比較法,對在重慶地區(qū)高中學(xué)校使用較廣泛的人教版和湘教版中的“三角學(xué)”部分的編寫差異作了較深入研究。本文在借鑒Yeping Li教科書比較研究模型基礎(chǔ)上,根據(jù)本研究的內(nèi)容和問題,確立了本研究的宏觀維度(教科書的整體特征、三角學(xué)主要內(nèi)容的選取、涵蓋內(nèi)容的編排順序)和微觀維度(解釋、范例、圖表、習(xí)題)。研究結(jié)論如下：1.兩版教科書在外觀特征方面相似點(diǎn)較多,但在版面設(shè)計(jì)和體例結(jié)構(gòu)方面卻形成鮮明對比。兩版教科書都是平裝設(shè)計(jì),外觀樸實(shí),色彩以黑白為主,部分彩色；就頁面排版來說,湘教版教科書中空白較多,提示和標(biāo)注也多,便于學(xué)生閱讀和總結(jié)；就體例結(jié)構(gòu)來說,湘教版教科書欄目設(shè)置豐富,人教版則比較單一。2.兩版教科書三角學(xué)主要內(nèi)容的選取基本相同,這主要是因?yàn)閮砂娼炭茣际且罁?jù)《普通高中數(shù)學(xué)課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)(實(shí)驗(yàn)稿)》而編寫的。3.兩版教科書中三角學(xué)主要內(nèi)容的編排順序基本一致,但“周期函數(shù)”的編排順序相差較大。4.在數(shù)學(xué)概念和原理的呈現(xiàn)方面,兩版教科書都傾向于用數(shù)學(xué)圖形直觀呈現(xiàn),整體上采用“知識點(diǎn)——例題——知識點(diǎn)——例題”的模式,但人教版較湘教版更注重問題情境的設(shè)置。5.在范例方面,兩版教科書都各具特色。人教版教科書中范例的背景更多樣化,范例的解題過程更注重解題說明,同時(shí)也很關(guān)注信息技術(shù)與教科書的整合；湘教版范例數(shù)量較人教版多,范例既用于鞏固和學(xué)生訓(xùn)練,也用于內(nèi)容教學(xué)。6.在圖表方面,兩版教科書都以與數(shù)學(xué)不相關(guān)圖表為主；人教版的圖表數(shù)量多于湘教版,并且人教版教科書三角學(xué)內(nèi)容中所含的與數(shù)學(xué)不相關(guān)圖表所占的比例也高于湘教版。這說明人教版更喜歡插入實(shí)物圖片來吸引學(xué)生的學(xué)習(xí)興趣。7.在習(xí)題方面,兩版教科書都偏重?zé)o背景習(xí)題,但湘教版教科書中有背景的習(xí)題類型多于人教版,這說明在對學(xué)生的期望和要求上,湘教版比較關(guān)注數(shù)學(xué)與現(xiàn)實(shí)世界的聯(lián)系,重視數(shù)學(xué)的實(shí)際應(yīng)用價(jià)值。最后,基于以上的研究結(jié)果,筆者對高中數(shù)學(xué)教科書的編寫提出幾點(diǎn)建議。
[Abstract]:As an important part of the curriculum development of primary and secondary schools, textbooks play an important role in primary and secondary school education and teaching. Since the implementation of the General Senior High School Mathematics Curriculum Standard (Experimental draft), there have been six versions of high school mathematics textbooks in China. Therefore, it is necessary to compare different versions of textbooks in detail, which is not only of practical significance to the education and teaching of front-line teachers, but also of great significance to the compilation of textbooks and the improvement of related contents. By using the methods of literature, content analysis and comparison, this paper makes a deep study on the differences in the compilation of "trigonometry" between the human teaching edition and the Hunan teaching edition, which are widely used in high school schools in Chongqing. Based on the comparative research model of Yeping Li textbooks and the contents and problems of this study, this paper establishes the macro dimensions of this study (the overall characteristics of textbooks and the selection of the main contents of trigonometry). Covers the order in which the content is arranged) and micro dimensions (interpretation, examples, charts, exercises). The conclusions of the study are as follows: 1. There are many similarities in appearance features between the two textbooks, but there is a sharp contrast in layout design and stylistic structure. The two editions of textbooks are paperback design, the appearance is simple, the color is mainly black and white, some colors; as far as page typesetting is concerned, there are more blanks, hints and tagging in Xiangjiao textbook, which is convenient for students to read and summarize. As far as the structure of style is concerned, the column of textbooks in Hunan Education Edition is rich, while the edition of people's Education is relatively single. 2. The main contents of trigonometry of the two editions of textbooks are basically the same, which is mainly due to the fact that the two editions of textbooks are based on the Curriculum Standards of Mathematics for Senior High School (Experimental draft). The arrangement order of the main contents of trigonometry in the two textbooks is basically the same, but the arrangement order of "periodic function" is quite different. 4. In the presentation of mathematical concepts and principles, the two editions of textbooks tend to be intuitively presented with mathematical graphics, and on the whole adopt the model of "knowledge points-examples-knowledge points-examples". However, the human education edition pays more attention to the setting of the problem situation than the Hunan teaching edition. 5. In terms of examples, both editions of textbooks have their own characteristics. The background of the examples in the textbook is more diversified, the process of problem solving pays more attention to the explanation of the problem, and also pays attention to the integration of information technology and textbooks. There are more examples in Hunan than in people. Examples are used not only for consolidation and student training, but also for content teaching. 6. In the aspect of charts, the two editions of textbooks are mainly related to mathematics; the number of charts in the people's education edition is more than that in the Hunan version, and the proportion of the math unrelated charts contained in the trigonometry content of the people's education version is also higher than that in the Hunan version. This shows that the people's Education Edition prefers to insert physical pictures to attract students' interest in learning. 7. In the aspect of exercises, both editions of textbooks pay more attention to exercises without background, but the types of exercises with background in the textbooks of Hunan education are more than those of the version of human education, which shows that the Hunan edition pays more attention to the relationship between mathematics and the real world in terms of expectations and requirements for students. Attach importance to the practical application value of mathematics. Finally, based on the above research results, the author puts forward some suggestions on the compilation of senior high school mathematics textbooks.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：G633.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 章健楠;葉立軍;;運(yùn)用縱橫二維框架比較中新教科書中“勾股定理”[J];長春教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年02期

2 鐘啟泉;;一綱多本:教育民主的訴求——我國教科書政策述評[J];教育發(fā)展研究;2009年04期

3 張維忠;李芳奇;;新加坡與中國數(shù)學(xué)教材的特色比較[J];外國中小學(xué)教育;2009年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 高令樂;中美高中數(shù)學(xué)教材中三角函數(shù)內(nèi)容的比較研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2007年

2 楊頌;現(xiàn)行兩套高中數(shù)學(xué)教材立體幾何內(nèi)容的文本比較研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2008年

3 趙玉晗;“北師版”與“華師版”初中數(shù)學(xué)新課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)實(shí)驗(yàn)教科書（七年級上冊）的比較研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2008年

4 沈春輝;中法高中數(shù)學(xué)教材中的數(shù)學(xué)文化比較研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：2475391