本文選題：熱電聯(lián)產(chǎn) + 項(xiàng)目管理�。� 參考：《華北電力大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：熱電聯(lián)產(chǎn)是高效利用煤炭的技術(shù)趨勢(shì),預(yù)計(jì)在未來(lái)將具有更加廣闊的應(yīng)用前景。它不僅能夠依靠對(duì)煤炭的高效利用給企業(yè)帶來(lái)經(jīng)濟(jì)效益,還能夠切實(shí)減輕化石能源對(duì)環(huán)境的影響,落實(shí)國(guó)家可持續(xù)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略。熱電聯(lián)產(chǎn)項(xiàng)目將在未來(lái)為國(guó)家節(jié)約大量能源,減少土地占用,提高電能熱能供給的安全性和可靠性。鑒于熱電聯(lián)產(chǎn)發(fā)展的良好趨勢(shì),總結(jié)和提煉熱電聯(lián)產(chǎn)項(xiàng)目從設(shè)計(jì)到建造和運(yùn)營(yíng)的相關(guān)經(jīng)驗(yàn)將有利于熱電聯(lián)產(chǎn)產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展,直接提高企業(yè)的技術(shù)水平、管理水平和經(jīng)濟(jì)效益,間接推動(dòng)了國(guó)家熱電聯(lián)產(chǎn)項(xiàng)目的發(fā)展。為此,本文就熱電聯(lián)產(chǎn)項(xiàng)目后評(píng)價(jià)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行研究和探討,以期得到合理的熱電聯(lián)產(chǎn)后評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系,選擇科學(xué)的綜合評(píng)價(jià)方法,有效的評(píng)價(jià)項(xiàng)目的全壽命周期的狀況,總結(jié)經(jīng)驗(yàn),指導(dǎo)后期項(xiàng)目的建設(shè)及運(yùn)營(yíng)。首先,本論文研究了現(xiàn)有的全壽命周期劃分思路和方法,結(jié)合了熱電聯(lián)產(chǎn)的基本特點(diǎn),提出了三階段的全壽命周期熱電聯(lián)產(chǎn)后評(píng)價(jià)階段劃分：決策與設(shè)計(jì)階段、建設(shè)階段和運(yùn)營(yíng)階段,為全壽命周期的指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建搭建了框架。在熱電聯(lián)產(chǎn)項(xiàng)目指標(biāo)體系框架內(nèi)逐步構(gòu)建并完善了相對(duì)清晰合理的后評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系,指標(biāo)體系由三個(gè)階段兩級(jí)指標(biāo)構(gòu)成。對(duì)構(gòu)建好的指標(biāo)體系,運(yùn)用AHP方法確定指標(biāo)權(quán)重。其次,為此本文在分析傳統(tǒng)后評(píng)價(jià)方法的基礎(chǔ)上,闡述了項(xiàng)目綜合評(píng)價(jià)方法選擇的基本原則。并結(jié)合電力行業(yè)普遍認(rèn)可的對(duì)標(biāo)管理模式,選擇了適合熱電聯(lián)產(chǎn)項(xiàng)目后評(píng)價(jià)的綜合評(píng)價(jià)方法：理想點(diǎn)法(TOPSIS)方法。該方法能夠較好的滿足熱電聯(lián)產(chǎn)項(xiàng)目的后評(píng)價(jià)需求,既能夠計(jì)算出項(xiàng)目綜合評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果,又能夠計(jì)算出項(xiàng)目各個(gè)階段的綜合評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果。既能夠反映項(xiàng)目的總體情況,又能夠分階段尋找差距,指導(dǎo)項(xiàng)目的改進(jìn)。最后,本文選用了H熱電聯(lián)產(chǎn)項(xiàng)目作為算例進(jìn)行計(jì)算和評(píng)價(jià)。計(jì)算過(guò)程中根據(jù)構(gòu)建好的指標(biāo)體系和經(jīng)由AHP方法計(jì)算得到的權(quán)重,運(yùn)用TOPSIS方法計(jì)算出了項(xiàng)目的綜合后評(píng)價(jià)和各階段的后評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果。根據(jù)結(jié)果進(jìn)行了分析和對(duì)比,指出了各階段的優(yōu)劣狀況,提出了改進(jìn)對(duì)策和建議,實(shí)現(xiàn)了本文最初提出的研究目標(biāo)。從國(guó)家的角度來(lái)說(shuō),該研究能夠掌握投產(chǎn)項(xiàng)目的投資和決策效果,并指導(dǎo)電廠的規(guī)劃和審批。從企業(yè)的角度來(lái)說(shuō),該研究能夠幫助決策層了解設(shè)計(jì)、建設(shè)、運(yùn)營(yíng)階段的狀況,豐富企業(yè)經(jīng)驗(yàn),有利于實(shí)現(xiàn)企業(yè)項(xiàng)目管理的精細(xì)化。
[Abstract]:Cogeneration of heat and electricity is a technical trend of high efficiency in coal utilization, and it is expected to have a wider application prospect in the future. It can not only rely on the efficient use of coal to bring economic benefits to enterprises, but also can effectively reduce the impact of fossil energy on the environment, and implement the national sustainable development strategy. The cogeneration project will save a lot of energy, reduce land occupation and improve the safety and reliability of thermal energy supply for the country in the future. In view of the good trend of cogeneration development, summing up and refining the relevant experiences of cogeneration projects from design to construction and operation will be conducive to the development of cogeneration industry and directly improve the technical level, management level and economic benefits of enterprises. Indirectly promoted the development of national heat and power cogeneration project. Therefore, this paper studies and discusses the post-evaluation of cogeneration project in order to obtain a reasonable evaluation index system of cogeneration project, select scientific comprehensive evaluation method, and effectively evaluate the condition of the whole life cycle of the project. Summarize the experience and guide the construction and operation of the project. First of all, this paper studies the existing idea and method of the whole life cycle division, combines the basic characteristics of the cogeneration, and puts forward three stages of the whole life cycle cogeneration post-evaluation stage: decision and design stage. The construction stage and the operation stage set up the frame for the index system of the whole life cycle. A relatively clear and reasonable post-evaluation index system is gradually constructed and perfected within the framework of the cogeneration project index system. The index system is composed of three stages and two levels of indicators. AHP method is used to determine the index weight. Secondly, based on the analysis of traditional post-evaluation methods, this paper expounds the basic principles of the selection of project comprehensive evaluation methods. Combined with the commonly accepted management mode of the power industry, the comprehensive evaluation method suitable for the post-evaluation of the cogeneration project is selected: the ideal point method and the Topsis method. This method can better meet the post-evaluation requirements of cogeneration projects. It can not only calculate the comprehensive evaluation results of the project, but also can calculate the comprehensive evaluation results of each stage of the project. It can not only reflect the overall situation of the project, but also look for the gap in stages to guide the improvement of the project. Finally, this paper selected H heat and power cogeneration project as an example to calculate and evaluate. According to the established index system and the weight calculated by AHP method, the comprehensive post-evaluation and post-evaluation results of each stage of the project are calculated by using the TOPSIS method. Based on the analysis and comparison of the results, the paper points out the advantages and disadvantages of each stage, puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions for improvement, and realizes the original research goal of this paper. From the national point of view, the research can master the investment and decision effect of the project, and guide the power plant planning and approval. From the point of view of the enterprise, the research can help the decision makers to understand the design, construction and operation stages, enrich the enterprise experience, and help to realize the refinement of enterprise project management.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華北電力大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F426.61

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 楊衛(wèi)紅;何永秀;李德智;李艷;李芙蓉;;模糊區(qū)間評(píng)價(jià)與層次分析相結(jié)合的電網(wǎng)改造項(xiàng)目綜合后評(píng)估方法[J];電網(wǎng)技術(shù);2009年05期

2 羅英極;陸海勤;;甘蔗糖廠熱電聯(lián)產(chǎn)效益分析[J];甘蔗糖業(yè);2011年02期

3 周二雄;李鳳婷;朱賀;;基于改進(jìn)層次分析法(AHP)的微網(wǎng)成本-效益評(píng)估[J];電力建設(shè);2013年03期

4 董力通;黃平;武敏霞;李鵬;;電網(wǎng)企業(yè)科技成果轉(zhuǎn)化后評(píng)價(jià)模型研究[J];電力建設(shè);2014年05期

5 曉斌,張阿玲,陳貴鋒;中國(guó)潔凈煤發(fā)電的生命周期清單分析[J];潔凈煤技術(shù);2005年02期

6 汪勁松,段廣洪,李方義,楊向東,張洪潮;基于產(chǎn)品生命周期的綠色制造技術(shù)研究現(xiàn)狀與展望[J];計(jì)算機(jī)集成制造系統(tǒng)-CIMS;1999年04期

7 黃希望;羅小勇;李軼;王大偉;;污水處理廠生命周期評(píng)價(jià)及不同工藝污水處理系統(tǒng)的環(huán)境影響比較分析[J];水資源保護(hù);2014年01期

8 周亮亮;劉朝;;潔凈燃煤發(fā)電技術(shù)全生命周期評(píng)價(jià)[J];中國(guó)電機(jī)工程學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1930052