本文選題：臨床醫(yī)學研究所 + PI負責制　； 參考：《北京中醫(yī)藥大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：背景與目的：Z臨床醫(yī)學研究所(簡稱臨研所)經過近30年的發(fā)展,在基礎醫(yī)學研究及基礎臨床相結合等方面為醫(yī)院的發(fā)展做出了巨大貢獻,但在長期發(fā)展中,也暴露出一些問題。近年來,在國內外醫(yī)學研究快速發(fā)展和醫(yī)學研究模式發(fā)生轉變的大環(huán)境下,臨研所的發(fā)展受到所存問題的制約,迫切需要一場全面的改革。本研究以臨研所現(xiàn)存的戰(zhàn)略定位不明確、管理制度落后、績效管理體系不健全三個主要問題為切入點,通過引入PI負責制和構建戰(zhàn)略性績效管理體系,為臨研所設計一套科學的解決方案。方法：(1)運用實地調查法,對北京市四家研究機構的科研管理制度進行調研,了解國內PI制的實施情況,同時,提煉四家研究機構實施PI制的共性做法,為本研究制定PI制管理辦法提供參考；(2)采用集體訪談法和問卷調查法對臨研所進行內部調研,全面了解臨研所存在的問題及職工對臨研所改革的建議,為臨研所制定戰(zhàn)略規(guī)劃提供信息支持；(3)采用專家座談會的形式制定臨研所未來十年的發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略,指導臨研所戰(zhàn)略性績效管理體系的制定；待戰(zhàn)略性績效管理體系初稿形成后,再次以專家座談會的形式對其進行修訂論證；結果：(1)本研究通過調研,整理形成了四份調研報告,從基本情況,實驗室管理、科研項目管理、科研人員管理及績效考核四個方面對研究所的科研管理制度進行全面介紹,從中總結出對臨研所改革的可借鑒之處;(2)通過內部調研、SWOT分析和專家討論,形成了臨研所未來十年的戰(zhàn)略發(fā)展規(guī)劃。(3)通過研究團隊討論和專家座談,設計了基于PI制的臨研所戰(zhàn)略性績效管理體系,包括PI制管理辦法,臨研所的戰(zhàn)略地圖,PI團隊的戰(zhàn)略地圖和平衡計分卡,PI、科研人員、科研秘書的個人平衡計分卡及績效管理辦法。結論：PI制是國內科研機構管理的趨勢,戰(zhàn)略性績效管理是績效管理理論發(fā)展的最新成果,可以幫助組織明確戰(zhàn)略,并將戰(zhàn)略與組織績效銜接,這兩種管理模式的引入可以有效解決臨研所現(xiàn)有問題,在實踐中也要注意與臨研所實際情況相結合。本研究是在理論層面進行了設計,是否有效還有待進一步實證研究的檢驗。
[Abstract]:Background and objective: after nearly 30 years of development, the Institute of Clinical Medicine of Z has made great contributions to the development of the hospital in the aspects of basic medical research and the combination of basic clinic and so on, but in the long-term development, Some problems have also been exposed. In recent years, with the rapid development of medical research at home and abroad and the change of medical research mode, the development of PARI is restricted by the existing problems, and a comprehensive reform is urgently needed. This research takes the three main problems, which are not clear strategic orientation, backward management system and imperfect performance management system, as the breakthrough point, through the introduction of Pi responsibility system and the construction of strategic performance management system. Design a set of scientific solutions for the Institute. Methods: using the field investigation method to investigate the scientific research management system of four research institutions in Beijing, to understand the implementation of Pi system in China, and at the same time, to refine the common practice of implementing Pi system in the four research institutions. To provide a reference for the establishment of Pi system management methods in this study. (2) to conduct internal investigation on the Institute by means of group interviews and questionnaires, and to understand the problems existing in the Institute and the suggestions made by the staff and workers on the reform of the Institute in an all-round way. To provide information support for the Institute in the formulation of its strategic plan. (3) to formulate the development strategy of the Institute for the next 10 years in the form of an expert forum to guide the development of the Institute's strategic performance management system; once the first draft of the strategic performance management system has been formed, Again, it was revised and demonstrated in the form of an expert forum; the results of this study were as follows: (1) through investigation, four research reports were formed, from the basic situation, laboratory management, and scientific research project management. This paper introduces the management system of scientific research in the institute from four aspects of scientific research personnel management and performance appraisal, and summarizes the reference points for the reform of the institute. (2) through internal investigation, SWOT analysis and expert discussion, The strategic development plan of the Institute for the next ten years is formed. Through research team discussions and expert discussions, the Institute's strategic performance management system based on Pi system is designed, including the Pi management method. Research Institute's strategic map Pi team's strategic map and balanced scorecard PI, research personnel, research secretary's personal balanced scorecard and performance management methods. Conclusion the system of "1: Pi" is the trend of the management of domestic scientific research institutions. Strategic performance management is the latest achievement of the development of performance management theory. It can help the organization to define the strategy and link up the strategy with the organizational performance. The introduction of these two management models can effectively solve the existing problems of the Institute, and should be combined with the actual situation of the Institute in practice. This study is designed at the theoretical level, and whether it is effective or not remains to be tested by further empirical research.
【學位授予單位】：北京中醫(yī)藥大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：R197.6;F272.92

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前8條

1 郝新保;蘇群豪;;從中美兩國實驗室管理模式探討我�？蒲衅脚_建設[J];海南醫(yī)學院學報;2008年01期

2 王盈;;美國聯(lián)邦政府對高校科研人員事務性工作的化解措施[J];世界教育信息;2007年03期

3 李強;韓伯棠;翟立新;;公共科研機構績效評價測度體系研究[J];科學學研究;2006年02期

4 劉紅玉;劉冬;葉彩鳳;周岱;趙加強;;英德國家科研實驗室機構的體制機制比較分析及借鑒[J];實驗室研究與探索;2007年11期

5 苗志敏;田立啟;楊士進;修海清;李江峰;賈卓霞;畢元廣;;醫(yī)院戰(zhàn)略性績效評價的研究概述[J];中國醫(yī)院管理;2012年03期

6 劉瑩;張大群;李曉軒;;美國聯(lián)邦科研機構的績效評估制度及其啟示[J];中國科技論壇;2007年09期

7 李克,黃宇烽,武建國;加強臨床實驗室管理 適應醫(yī)療體制改革[J];中國衛(wèi)生事業(yè)管理;2001年09期

8 邱霈恩;美國《1993政府績效與結果法案》譯文[J];中國行政管理;2004年05期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 周萌;平衡計分卡在政府績效評估中的應用[D];西南交通大學;2006年

，

本文編號：1794727